IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1962;1:565-578.)
© 1962 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JAMPEL, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JAMPEL, R. S.

Extraocular Muscle Action from Brain Stimulation in the Macaque

ROBERT S. JAMPEL 1

1 Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, N. Y.

A study was made of the eye muscles activated by faradic stimulation of the frontal cortex, midbrain tegmentum, and oculomotor nerve of the macaque. The traditional view concerning the actions of the individual muscles was not confirmed. The vertical recti were found to be effective elevators and depressors of the eyesregardless of the position of the eye in the horizontal plane. At the brain levels stimulated, the vertical recti neither acted as adductors when the eye was partially adducted nor acted as torters. The superior oblique was an intorter regardless of the position of the eye in the orbit and did not behave as an effective depressor when the eye was adducted or as an abductor when the eye was partially abducted. In these experiments the superior oblique was activated only from midbrain stimulation. The inferior oblique acted as an elevator in the primary and adducted positions and as an extorter when the eye was abducted from both cortical and midbrain sites. The horizontal recti produced precise, balanced eye movements from cortical stimulation without the collaboration of the vertical muscles. Cocontraction of the vertical muscles was not demonstrated. In oblique conjugate movements from cortical stimulation the participation of two muscles was demonstrated. Torsion of the globe was not produced by cortical stimulation. An individual muscle is capable, when acting independently, of bringing the eye to different end positions (goals). Two individual or groups of muscles are capable, under certain circumstances, of bringing the eye to the same end position. It is suggested that these observations can be explained if it is assumed that an extraocular muscle is composed of motor units that subserve different functions (in terms of goal and speed of eye movement) and exert unequal forces along the muscle insertion.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology