IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1971;10:664-671.)
© 1971 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by UENOYAMA, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by UENOYAMA, K.

Visual-Evoked Response Produced by Patterned Light Stimulus

KENSHIRO UENOYAMA 1

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C., Canada; Department of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Rosai Hospital, Koya 435, Wakayama, Japan

The photopic visual-evoked response (VER) produced by patterned stimuli was examined by changing: (1) the stimulus magnitude, (2) the contour density of the test pattern, and (3) the contour contrast. In the majority of normal subjects the VERs obtained by a grating pattern showed their maximum response at a relatively low level of stimulus magnitude. With a logarithmic increase in contour density of the test pattern, the response amplitude increased in almost linear fashion. The VERs to the multiple-hole pattern of different contrast showed an S-shaped increase of the amplitude with an increase of log contrast. The latency of these VERs showed very small change when contour density or contrast was changed. The results suggested that there were two different components in the VER. The one was due to the light sensitivity and the other was due to the contrast sensitivity in the visual system. The latter seemed to be dominant in the photopic VER.

Key Words: visual-evoked response • patterned luminous stimulus • contour density • contrast

Submitted on May 18, 1971
Accepted on July 6, 1971







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology