IOVS Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1972;11:789-799.)
© 1972 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAWSON, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by CHILDERS, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DAWSON, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by CHILDERS, D. G.

Variations in Human Cortical Response to Patterns and Image Quality

WILLIAM W. DAWSON 1, NATHAN W. PERRY Jr. 1, and DONALD G. CHILDERS 1

1 Departments of Ophthalmology, Psychology, and Electrical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville

Selective excitation of the human visual cortex by patterned stimuli was examined in a randomly selected sample of normal adults and adults with severe monocular visual loss residting from childhood strabismic amblyopia. Six of the eight normal eyes showed selective but variable configuration cortical evoked responses (VER, passband 0.2 to 50 Hz.) to patterned stimulation when lenses were used to vary the retinal focus. The remainder of the normal sample also showed response peaks where resolution was maximum, but these were in the signal passband 50 to 500 Hz., previously called the fast occipital potential (FOP). We applied normalizing signals to correct for individual response variations. Statistical proofs indicated that this procedure reduced variability about mean results. Two of the three amblyopic eyes produced no response peak, VER or FOP, at the refractive value for best resolution. A small VER peak was found in one amblyopic subject who had eccentric fixation. Subtraction of mean nonpattern from pattern-evoked signals at optimal refraction disclosed a cortical signal which may be a relatively "pure pattern" response. As a clinical aid, the VER and its high frequency correlate, the FOP, appear to provide an objective test of the resolving power of the visual system with accuracy equal to or exceeding 0.5 D. sphere.

Key Words: pattern sensitivity • visual cortex • refraction • human variability • amblyopia

Submitted on February 14, 1972
Accepted on May 25, 1972







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology