IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidowitz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Breinin, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davidowitz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Breinin, G. M.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 23, 533-538, Copyright © 1982 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Cytoplasmic inclusions in rabbit extraocular muscle

J Davidowitz, G Philips and GM Breinin

Cytoplasmic inclusion bodies, similar to those previously described in abnormal and normal human extraocular muscle, were observed in the orbital surface layer of the superior rectus muscle in rabbit. These inclusion bodies are composed of a flocculent material of low density studded with granular foci of increased density. In sequential samples of serially reconstructed muscle fibers visualized by electron microscopy, cytoplasmic inclusion bodies were seen in 4.5% of 1187 samples through multiply innervated fibers that vary systematically in diameter along their length; inclusion bodies were also seen in 0.8% of 354 samples through multiple innervated fibers of constant diameter. Cytoplasmic inclusion bodies were not seen in 1838 samples through singly innervated fibers. These data suggest that such inclusion bodies may occur preferentially in multiply innervated fibers. The present findings are not compatible with previous suggestions that such cytoplasmic inclusion bodies may be indicative of a pathologic or aging process. These findings are consistent with previous suggestions that such inclusion bodies are to be considered as normal structures in extraocular muscle.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology