IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dell'Osso, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dell'Osso, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, J. T.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 24, 1580-1587, Copyright © 1983 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

The nystagmus blockage syndrome. Congenital nystagmus, manifest latent nystagmus, or both?

LF Dell'Osso, C Ellenberger Jr, LA Abel and JT Flynn

We have carefully studied, by quantitative oculography, a patient with the nystagmus blockage syndrome (NBS), and two patients with a similar disorder of eye movements that might be mistaken clinically for NBS. Our recordings revealed two distinctly different abnormalities present in a single patient with NBS. Our NBS patient exhibited congenital nystagmus (CN) waveforms when viewing at distance; the CN did not damp with convergence on a near target. When the patient allowed one eye to become esotropic, however, the nystagmus damped considerably and abruptly changed from CN to manifest latent nystagmus (MLN). This peculiar transition from CN to MLN has not been described previously. The appearance of MLN in a case with ongoing CN suggests that two different mechanisms may underlie NBS, since the only other case documented with eye movement recordings showed no transition to MLN. Because the diagnosis of NBS usually is made on evidence of clinical signs alone, it is probable that these two types have been combined indiscriminately and presented as one syndrome. In addition, our discovery of two mechanisms discernable only by quantitative recording suggests that NBS has been diagnosed inappropriately in patients with clinically similar but oculographically different eye signs. Further quantitative studies are required to fully define NBS and to determine if these are the only two mechanisms found in this syndrome.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology