IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by O'Day, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by O'Day, D. M.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 26, 1186-1188, Copyright © 1985 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic research

WA Ray and DM O'Day

An apparently common error in statistical analysis of ophthalmic data is to perform statistical tests that do not account for the correlation generally present between observations made for the right and left eyes of a subject. This error has as a consequence an overstatement of the precision of the study, resulting in incorrect P values which indicate a greater measure of statistical significance than the data warrant. As measures to reduce the occurrence of this serious error in statistical analyses, the authors recommend increased emphasis on educational programs for investigators, stimulation of nontechnical articles reviewing statistical methods, and a sharper focus upon statistical analysis in the peer review process.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
K Hayashi and H Hayashi
Visual function in patients with yellow tinted intraocular lenses compared with vision in patients with non-tinted intraocular lenses
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2006; 90(8): 1019 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. A. Rosser, I. E. Murdoch, and S. N. Cousens
The Effect of Optical Defocus on the Test-Retest Variability of Visual Acuity Measurements
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1076 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
H. P. N. Scholl, D. Besch, R. Vonthein, B. H. F. Weber, and E. Apfelstedt-Sylla
Alterations of Slow and Fast Rod ERG Signals in Patients with Molecularly Confirmed Stargardt Disease Type 1
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2002; 43(4): 1248 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
H. P. N. Scholl, H. Langrova, C. M. Pusch, B. Wissinger, E. Zrenner, and E. Apfelstedt-Sylla
Slow and Fast Rod ERG Pathways in Patients with X-Linked Complete Stationary Night Blindness Carrying Mutations in the NYX Gene
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2001; 42(11): 2728 - 2736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology