IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaul, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brubaker, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaul, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brubaker, R. F.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 27, 1331-1335, Copyright © 1986 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Measurement of aqueous flow in rabbits with corneal and vitreous depots of fluorescent dye

GR Gaul and RF Brubaker

Using pigmented rabbits, two fluorophotometric methods for measuring aqueous flow were compared. A corneal depot of dye was used to measure aqueous flow in one eye of each rabbit while the vitreous depot method of Johnson and Maurice was used to measure aqueous flow over the same period in the fellow eye. After intravenous administration of acetazolamide or mannitol, during the first hour after drug delivery a decrease in aqueous flow was observed in the eye with the corneal depot of dye that was undetected in the eye with the vitreous depot of dye. In rabbits which were water-loaded by orogastric tube, an increase in aqueous flow was observed by the corneal depot method, while the vitreous depot method indicated a decrease in aqueous flow. The vitreous depot method depends on the assumption that the rate of loss of dye from the vitreous remains stable. It is shown that movement of water into or out of the vitreous can cause large changes in the rate of movement of dye from the vitreous to the anterior chamber and can make interpretation of the vitreous method ambiguous. While the vitreous depot method is probably superior for measuring sustained changes of the rate of aqueous flow over tens of hours or days, it is concluded that it cannot be used for measuring changes over shorter periods.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology