|
|
||||||||
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 28, 1514-1520, Copyright © 1987 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
ARTICLES AND REPORTS |
JA Bonanno and KA Polse
The effects of tear-film hypoxia and contact lens wear on human in vivo stromal pH was tested using a non-invasive fluorometric technique. Hypoxia was produced by exposing the normal open eye to 100% nitrogen gas passed through tight-fitting goggles. Stromal pH dropped from 7.53 +/- 0.02 to 7.34 +/- 0.03 (n = 12, +/- SD) within 90 min of nitrogen gas exposure, t1/2 = 20 min. After removing the goggles, stromal pH returned to baseline in 35 min, t1/2 = 10 min. Wearing a thick hydrogel contact lens which caused a tear PO2 less than or equal to 2 mm Hg with the eyes open, reduced stromal pH from 7.55 +/- 0.02 to 7.15 +/- 0.04 (n = 12, +/- SD) in 80 min, t1/2 = 9.5 min. After removing the lens, baseline pH was reached in 40 min, t1/2 = 4.5 min. The stromal pH differences between hypoxia (N2 only) and contact lens wear were not due to differences in tear temperature between the two procedures (contact lens wear 32 +/- 1.5 degrees C, goggles 33 +/- 1.0 degrees C). However exposing the eye to 95% nitrogen-5% carbon dioxide reduced stromal pH to 7.16 +/- 0.05 (n = 7, +/- SD) in 80 min, t1/2 = 8 min, which was similar to that produced during contact lens wear. These experiments show that contact lens wear causes corneal acidosis by: (1) the production of protons from hypoxic metabolism, and (2) the accumulation of carbon dioxide behind the lens due to low lens CO2 transmissibility.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Esco, L. D. Hazlett, and M. Kurpakus-Wheater Pseudomonas aeruginosa Binds to Extracellular Matrix Deposited by Human Corneal Epithelial Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 3654 - 3659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Graham, R. E. Fusaro, K. A. Polse, M. C. Lin, and C. J. Giasson Predicting Extended Wear Complications from Overnight Corneal Swelling Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2001; 42(13): 3150 - 3157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |