Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 34, 3534-3540, Copyright © 1993 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma

BC Chauhan, JD Tompkins, RP LeBlanc and TA McCormick
Department of Ophthalmology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

PURPOSE. The authors performed this study to determine factors that affect the characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma. METHODS. The sample consisted of 70 subjects (22 normal subjects, 12 patients with suspected glaucoma, and 36 patients with glaucoma). A program was written to interface with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, CA) to measure frequency-of-seeing curves. The authors presented stimuli 8 dB either side of the estimated threshold in 1-dB intervals with five repetitions at each stimulus intensity. The authors tested four to six locations in each subject, with randomization of the stimulus intensity and location. Fixation was monitored with the Heijl-Krakau method. Using a probit program, the authors calculated the threshold and slope (estimated by the interquartile range) of each curve. RESULTS. The authors obtained 124 curves from the normal subjects, 71 from the patients with suspected glaucoma, and 183 from the patients with glaucoma. In all three groups, the slope of the frequency-of-seeing curve was correlated highly with the threshold or threshold deviation, although the correlation was significantly higher in the normal subjects compared with the patients with suspected glaucoma and patients with glaucoma, even after controlling for the range of the threshold and threshold deviation. For this reason, the authors found considerably different frequency-of- seeing curves, between subject groups and also within the group of patients with glaucoma, in locations with the same threshold. CONCLUSIONS. There may be fundamental differences in areas of normal subjects and patients with glaucoma with similar thresholds or threshold deviations. These differences also may exist within patients with glaucoma.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. G. Strouthidis, A. Scott, A. C. Viswanathan, D. P. Crabb, and D. F. Garway-Heath Monitoring Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression: The Effect of a Novel Spatial Filter Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 251 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. G. Strouthidis, V. Vinciotti, A. J. Tucker, S. K. Gardiner, D. P. Crabb, and D. F. Garway-Heath Structure and Function in Glaucoma: The Relationship between a Functional Visual Field Map and an Anatomic Retinal Map Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5356 - 5362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Verdon-Roe, M. C. Westcott, A. C. Viswanathan, F. W. Fitzke, and D. F. Garway-Heath Exploration of the Psychophysics of a Motion Displacement Hyperacuity Stimulus Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4847 - 4855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. G. Strouthidis, A. Scott, N. M. Peter, and D. F. Garway-Heath Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 2904 - 2910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C A Westall Detecting ocular-visual function changes in diabetes Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2005; 89(11): 1392 - 1393. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E D Gilmore, C Hudson, R K Nrusimhadevara, and P T Harvey Frequency of seeing characteristics of the short wavelength sensitive visual pathway in clinically normal subjects and diabetic patients with focal sensitivity loss Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2005; 89(11): 1462 - 1467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Keltner, C. A. Johnson, R. A. Levine, J. Fan, K. E. Cello, M. A. Kass, M. O. Gordon, and for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group Normal Visual Field Test Results Following Glaucomatous Visual Field End Points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2005; 123(9): 1201 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Turpin, A. M. McKendrick, C. A. Johnson, and A. J. Vingrys Properties of Perimetric Threshold Estimates from Full Threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like Strategies, as Determined by Computer Simulation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 4787 - 4795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Anderson Spatial Resolution of the Tendency-Oriented Perimetry Algorithm Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 1962 - 1968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P G D Spry, C A Johnson, A M McKendrick, and A Turpin Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2003; 87(1): 107 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. G. D. Spry, C. A. Johnson, A. B. Bates, A. Turpin, and B. C. Chauhan Spatial and Temporal Processing of Threshold Data for Detection of Progressive Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2002; 120(2): 173 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. G. D. Spry, C. A. Johnson, A. M. McKendrick, and A. Turpin Variability Components of Standard Automated Perimetry and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2001; 42(6): 1404 - 1410. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. L. Keltner, C. A. Johnson, J. M. Quigg, K. E. Cello, M. A. Kass, M. O. Gordon, and for the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group Confirmation of Visual Field Abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2000; 118(9): 1187 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Henson, S. Chaudry, P. H. Artes, E. B. Faragher, and A. Ansons Response Variability in the Visual Field: Comparison of Optic Neuritis, Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension, and Normal Eyes Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2000; 41(2): 417 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text]