IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demer, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Amjadi, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demer, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Amjadi, F.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 34, 1894-1906, Copyright © 1993 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Dynamic visual acuity of normal subjects during vertical optotype and head motion

JL Demer and F Amjadi
Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Medical School 90024-7002.

PURPOSE. To characterize the effect of passive vertical head motion on dynamic visual acuity of young, normally sighted subjects wearing telescopic spectacles, and to relate this to the velocity of images on the retina. METHODS. Static visual acuity was measured without motion. Dynamic visual acuity was measured during vertical, sinusoidal motion of either optotypes or of a servo-driven rotating chair in which subjects were seated. Dynamic visual acuity for head motion was measured unaided, as well as with 1.9X, 4X, and 6X telescopic spectacles. Vertical eye movements were recorded using magnetic search coils. RESULTS. During optotype motion, acuity declined with increasing velocity to a minimum of approximately 20/200 at 100 degrees/sec. Pursuit gain (eye velocity/optotype velocity) for moving optotypes was low except for optotype velocities of 20 degrees/sec of less. Dynamic visual acuity without telescopic spectacles was not sensitive to head motion. Static visual acuity improved with increasing telescopic spectacle power, but dynamic visual acuity became progressively impaired by head motion as telescopic spectacle power was increased. Compared with static visual acuity, head motion with peak velocity of 40 degrees/sec reduced acuity two-fold for 1.9X telescopic spectacles, fourfold for 4X telescopic spectacles, and eightfold for 6X telescopic spectacles. Visual vestibulo-ocular reflex gain with telescopic spectacles increased to values markedly above 1.0, but was always less than telescopic spectacle magnification. There was visual tolerance of slip velocities of 2 degrees/sec or less, above which acuity declined in proportion to the 0.6 power of retinal slip velocity. Above 2 degrees/sec, retinal slip velocity accounted for 95% of the variance in dynamic visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS. These results confirm that acuity is sensitive to retinal image motion in the vertical direction, and extend this finding to indicate that sensitivity of acuity to vertical head motion during wearing of telescopic spectacles is attributable to retinal image slip velocity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. H. Weiss and J. P. Kelly
Acuity Development in Infantile Nystagmus
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4093 - 4099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. T. Crane, J. Tian, and J. L. Demer
Temporal Dynamics of Ocular Position Dependence of the Initial Human Vestibulo-ocular Reflex.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 1426 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R. HARPER, L. CULHAM, and C. DICKINSON
Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation: a comparison with existing technology
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 1999; 83(4): 495 - 500.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. T. Crane and J. L. Demer
Human Gaze Stabilization During Natural Activities: Translation, Rotation, Magnification, and Target Distance Effects
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1997; 78(4): 2129 - 2144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology