IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wild, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wild, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, E. C.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 36, 1398-1410, Copyright © 1995 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss

JM Wild, ID Moss, D Whitaker and EC O'Neill
Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To evaluate short-wavelength-sensitive perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. METHODS. The sample consisted of 27 normal subjects, 24 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), and 27 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT). Blue-on-yellow (B-Y) and standard (W-W) perimetry was undertaken with a modified Humphrey Field Analyzer 640 on one eye of each subject and patient. The B-Y data were corrected for individual ocular media absorption. Results were compared to an age-matched normal database of 50 subjects (age range, 60 to 82 years; mean age, 70.0 years; SD, 6.4 years). Visual field indices and total and pattern deviation probability maps were calculated for both W-W and B-Y fields. RESULTS. The B-Y normal database exhibited increased between-subject variability compared to the W-W normal database (P < 0.001). The greater variability increased with the increase in eccentricity (P < 0.001) and with the increase in age (P = 0.032). All patients with POAG exhibited B-Y field loss; 11 demonstrated greater B-Y loss than the corresponding W-W field. In advanced POAG, the B-Y and the W-W fields were similar. Twenty-five of the 27 normal subjects exhibited normal B-Y fields. Five of the 27 patients with OHT manifested B-Y focal abnormality and a normal W-W field: in two, W-W focal loss subsequently developed. CONCLUSIONS. Short-wavelength-sensitive perimetry can identify visual field loss before that detected by W-W perimetry. However, the increased between- subject variability necessitates stringent statistical analysis in the definition of abnormality.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
E D Gilmore, C Hudson, R K Nrusimhadevara, and P T Harvey
Frequency of seeing characteristics of the short wavelength sensitive visual pathway in clinically normal subjects and diabetic patients with focal sensitivity loss
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2005; 89(11): 1462 - 1467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. Asman, J. M. Wild, and A. Heijl
Appearance of the Pattern Deviation Map as a Function of Change in Area of Localized Field Loss
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3099 - 3106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. Felius and W. H. Swanson
Effects of Cone Adaptation on Variability in S-Cone Increment Thresholds
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 4140 - 4146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. Bengtsson
A New Rapid Threshold Algorithm for Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 1388 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
A. M. McKendrick, G. A. Cioffi, and C. A. Johnson
Short-Wavelength Sensitivity Deficits in Patients With Migraine
Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2002; 120(2): 154 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. Hutchings, S. L. Hosking, J. M. Wild, and J. G. Flanagan
Long-term Fluctuation in Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma Suspects and Glaucoma Patients
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2001; 42(10): 2332 - 2337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. A. Sample, C. F. Bosworth, E. Z. Blumenthal, C. Girkin, and R. N. Weinreb
Visual Function-Specific Perimetry for Indirect Comparison of Different Ganglion Cell Populations in Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2000; 41(7): 1783 - 1790.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. B. Henson, S. Chaudry, P. H. Artes, E. B. Faragher, and A. Ansons
Response Variability in the Visual Field: Comparison of Optic Neuritis, Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension, and Normal Eyes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2000; 41(2): 417 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M PACHECO-CUTILLAS, D F EDGAR, and A SAHRAIE
Acquired colour vision defects in glaucoma---their detection and clinical significance
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 1999; 83(12): 1396 - 1402.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. S. Harwerth, L. Carter-Dawson, F. Shen, E. L. Smith III, and M. L. J. Crawford
Ganglion Cell Losses Underlying Visual Field Defects from Experimental Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 1999; 40(10): 2242 - 2250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
V. Polo, E. Abecia, L. E. Pablo, I. Pinilla, J. M. Larrosa, and F. M. Honrubia
Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Evaluation in Suspected Cases of Glaucoma
Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 1998; 116(10): 1295 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology