IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menage, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menage, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, P. L.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 36, 1745-1749, Copyright © 1995 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

epsilon-Aminocaproic acid does not inhibit outflow resistance washout in monkeys

MJ Menage, MA Croft, SJ Gange and PL Kaufman
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, USA.

PURPOSE. To determine whether the anti-fibrinolytic agent epsilon- aminocaproic acid (EACA) inhibits the washout of resistance to aqueous humor outflow during anterior chamber perfusion in cynomolgus monkeys, as it does in rabbits. METHODS. Nine adult ocular normotensive cynomolgus monkeys underwent bilateral anterior chamber perfusion with Barany solution, containing 3.8 mM EACA unilaterally. Total outflow facility was determined in both eyes simultaneously for approximately 4 hours by the two-level constant pressure method. The data were analyzed using a linear regression model that tested treated versus control eye differences over time against a slope and intercept of 0.0. RESULTS. Outflow facility increased and resistance decreased significantly over time similarly in both EACA-treated and control eyes; i.e., neither the slopes nor the intercepts for facility or resistance, respectively, differed between the eyes over the entire 4-hour measurement period or for the initial 90 minutes considered separately. The facility increase and resistance decrease as functions of perfusion volume also were similar in EACA-treated and control eyes. CONCLUSIONS. EACA at this dose does not prevent resistance washout in the cynomolgus monkey, in contrast to the rabbit. This species difference may relate to the vastly different anatomy and physiology of their outflow pathways.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology