IOVS Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nasanen, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rovamo, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nasanen, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rovamo, J. M.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 36, 1855-1862, Copyright © 1995 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

A window model for spatial integration in human pattern discrimination

RE Nasanen, HT Kukkonen and JM Rovamo
Department of Physiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

PURPOSE. A simple model of human visual pattern discrimination was designed and tested experimentally. The model is based on two assumptions. First, at any glimpse the spatial integration of image information is limited to a window. Second, the observer generates a tailored discriminator for the signals in question using available information. The model is composed of a spatial integration window followed by an ideal discriminator. METHODS. The model was tested by comparing its performance with that of human observers in orientation and contrast discrimination. Using a two-alternative, forced-choice method, human orientation and contrast discrimination thresholds were measured for cosine gratings of various areas and spatial frequencies in the presence of two-dimensional spatial noise. RESULTS. Orientation discrimination thresholds decreased considerably with increasing grating area. Thus, there was clear spatial integration. However, in contrast discrimination, thresholds appeared to decrease only slightly. To make the two tasks comparable, the results also were expressed in terms of efficiency. Human efficiency decreased with grating area in a similar way in the two tasks. This suggests that the factors limiting spatial integration are the same in both tasks. Indeed, the threshold data were explained by the model with the same window size in both tasks with good accuracy. The absolute performance of the model was approximately equal to that of human observers. CONCLUSIONS. The success of the model supports the hypothesis of a spatial integration window. It also supports the idea that human observers use knowledge about the signals to generate an efficient discriminator.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology