Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 37, 1492-1501, Copyright © 1996 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision

JS Mansfield, GE Legge and MC Bane
Minnesota Laboratory for Low-Vision Research, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the effect of font on low-vision reading. In this study, the authors measured the influence of font in reading with normal and low vision. METHODS: Reading acuity, maximum reading speed, and critical print size (the smallest print that can be read with maximum speed) were measured in 50 normal subjects and 42 subjects with low vision. Data were collected using versions of the MNREAD Acuity Chart printed with the Times (proportionally spaced) and Courier (fixed-width) fonts. RESULTS: Reading acuity scores obtained with Courier were better than those obtained with Times for both normal (mean difference, 0.05 logMAR, P < 0.001) and subjects with low vision (0.09 logMAR, P < 0.001). Similarly, critical print sizes measured with Courier were smaller than those measured with Times (mean difference, 0.06 logMAR for normal subjects and subjects with low vision, P < 0.002). Maximum reading speeds for normal subjects were 5% faster with Times than with Courier (P < 0.001), but for subjects with low vision, maximum reading speeds were 10% slower with Times than with Courier (P < 0.05). For print smaller than the critical print size, the reading speeds of normal subjects and subjects with low vision were substantially slower (by as much as 50%) for Times than for Courier. CONCLUSIONS: There are small, but significant, advantages of Courier over Times in reading acuity, critical print size, and reading speed for subjects with low vision. For normal subjects, the differences are slighter, with an advantage in reading speed for Times. However, for print sizes close to the acuity limit, choice of font could make a significant difference in both normal and low-vision reading performance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.-H. Cheung, C. S. Kallie, G. E. Legge, and A. M. Y. Cheong Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling of MNREAD Data Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 828 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. McLeish A study of the effect of letter spacing on the reading speed of young readers with low vision British Journal of Visual Impairment, May 1, 2007; 25(2): 133 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G A Hahn, D Penka, C Gehrlich, A Messias, M Weismann, L Hyvarinen, M Leinonen, M Feely, G Rubin, C Dauxerre, et al. New standardised texts for assessing reading performance in four European languages. Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2006; 90(4): 480 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Seiple, J. P. Szlyk, T. McMahon, J. Pulido, and G. A. Fishman Eye-Movement Training for Reading in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2886 - 2896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				The Complications of Age-Related Macular Degenerat The Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT): rationale, design and methodology Clinical Trials, February 1, 2004; 1(1): 91 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. T. L. Chung The Effect of Letter Spacing on Reading Speed in Central and Peripheral Vision Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2002; 43(4): 1270 - 1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. V. Cideciyan, D. C. Hood, Y. Huang, E. Banin, Z.-Y. Li, E. M. Stone, A. H. Milam, and S. G. Jacobson Disease sequence from mutant rhodopsin allele to rod and cone photoreceptor degeneration in man PNAS, June 9, 1998; 95(12): 7103 - 7108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]