Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 38, 2566-2575, Copyright © 1997 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly

DB Elliott, M Trukolo-Ilic, JG Strong, R Pace, A Plotkin and P Bevers
Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To profile certain demographic features of the low-vision population in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Sixty-six optometrists or optometry centers, 8 ophthalmologists, and 23 Canadian National Institute for the Blind rehabilitation worker teams were recruited to the study. They were required to report on their low-vision examinations during a 3-year period. RESULTS: Reports from 4744 low- vision examinations were received. Of the patients examined, 71% were over age 65 (subsequently called seniors or elderly), and 55% were over age 75. Ninety percent of all the patients lived in households and 10% lived in institutions. Seniors made up 71% of the patients living in households and 88% of the patients living in institutions. Most of the seniors were women (65%), and 57% had functional limitations in addition to low vision, most commonly limitations in mobility, hearing, or agility. Age-related maculopathy was the primary diagnosis in 75% of seniors, and the most common secondary diagnosis was cataract (46%). The main objective for most elderly low-vision patients was to gain improvement in personal reading (75%). CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of low-vision patients were elderly, the largest number being 75 to 84 years old. When older senior low-vision patients (> or = 85 years) were compared with younger seniors (65 to 74 years), the older seniors were more likely to be women, more likely to have additional functional limitations, more likely to live in an institution, and more likely to have age-related maculopathy and cataract. Whether some elderly low- vision patients may be helped by cataract surgery needs to be determined.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.-H. Cheung, C. S. Kallie, G. E. Legge, and A. M. Y. Cheong Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling of MNREAD Data Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2008; 49(2): 828 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Iliffe, K. Kharicha, D. Harari, C. Swift, G. Gillmann, and A. Stuck Self-reported visual function in healthy older people in Britain: an exploratory study of associations with age, sex, depression, education and income Fam. Pract., December 1, 2005; 22(6): 585 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Tejeria, R A Harper, P H Artes, and C M Dickinson Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2002; 86(9): 1019 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. L. Chung The Effect of Letter Spacing on Reading Speed in Central and Peripheral Vision Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2002; 43(4): 1270 - 1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Elliott, B. Patel, and D. Whitaker Development of a Reading Speed Test for Potential-Vision Measurements Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2001; 42(8): 1945 - 1949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Hazel, K. L. Petre, R. A. Armstrong, M. T. Benson, and N. A. Frost Visual Function and Subjective Quality of Life Compared in Subjects with Acquired Macular Disease Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2000; 41(6): 1309 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. HARPER, L. CULHAM, and C. DICKINSON Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation: a comparison with existing technology Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 1999; 83(4): 495 - 500. [Full Text]