IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Netland, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Netland, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, A.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 38, 2655-2661, Copyright © 1997 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Color Doppler ultrasound measurements after topical and retrobulbar epinephrine in primate eyes

PA Netland, SW Siegner and A Harris
Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of topical epinephrine and retrobulbar anesthesia containing lidocaine with epinephrine on retrobulbar hemodynamic measurements in the primate eye, using color Doppler ultrasound. METHODS: Color Doppler ultrasound measurements were performed at baseline and 90 minutes after masked administration of topical 2% epinephrine or balanced salt solution to six cynomolgus monkeys. Measurements were also performed at baseline and 30 minutes after retrobulbar injection of 2% lidocaine, with or without 1:200,000 epinephrine. RESULTS: After topical epinephrine, color Doppler ultrasound measurements were not significantly different compared with baseline measurements in the central retinal artery, posterior ciliary arteries, and superior ophthalmic vein. There were decreased systolic and diastolic velocities in the ophthalmic artery (P < 0.03 and P < 0.02, respectively) after topical epinephrine; however, Pourcelot's ratio (resistive index) was not significantly different compared with that at baseline. In contrast, there were marked changes in the retrobulbar arterial circulation after retrobulbar injection of lidocaine with epinephrine. The systolic and diastolic velocities were decreased significantly in the central retinal artery (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively), temporal posterior ciliary artery (P < 0.05 and P < 0.03, respectively), and nasal posterior ciliary artery (P < 0.03 and P < 0.02, respectively). Pourcelot's ratio was significantly increased in the central retinal artery (P < 0.01), temporal posterior ciliary artery (P < 0.02), and nasal posterior ciliary artery (P < 0.02) after retrobulbar injection of lidocaine with epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that one drop of topical epinephrine has little or no effect on the retrobulbar circulation, whereas retrobulbar injection of anesthetic solution containing lidocaine with epinephrine significantly alters retrobulbar hemodynamics in the monkey eye.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
K K Huber and A Remky
Effect of retrobulbar versus subconjunctival anaesthesia on retrobulbar haemodynamics
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2005; 89(6): 719 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology