IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, S. J.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2000;41:325-335.)
© 2000 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Effects of Glaucoma and Aging on Photopic and Scotopic Motion Perception

Alexandra Willis1 and Stephen J. Anderson2

1 From the Transport Research Institute, Napier University; and the 2 Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway College, University of London, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To examine the effects of primary open-angle glaucoma and normal aging on visual sensitivity for targets known to bias responses from the magnocellular visual processing stream.

METHODS. Contrast sensitivity was measured for the detection and direction discrimination of low-spatial-frequency (0.5 cyc/deg), drifting (4–24 Hz) sinusoidal gratings in 15 patients with glaucoma (mean age, 58.7 years), 14 age-matched control subjects (mean age 55.8 years), and 10 young control subjects (mean age, 24.4 years). As a control, sensitivity was measured for the detection of stationary stimuli. Stimuli of 4.7° square were presented at either 0° eccentricity or at 20° along the nasal horizontal meridian, under both photopic and scotopic levels of lighting.

RESULTS. Across a wide range of conditions, the ability to detect and discriminate visual motion declined significantly (P < 0.05) with increasing age, whereas the ability to detect stationary patterns was generally unaffected. The rate of decline was adequately described by a simple linear function. Control studies showed that the age-related motion sensitivity losses could not be attributed solely to decreases in retinal illuminance associated with increasing age. Of note, however, there were no significant differences in mean sensitivity between glaucoma and age-matched control groups for any of the conditions used.

CONCLUSIONS. Even under conditions believed to bias the response of the visual system to the magnocellular pathway, glaucoma subjects could not be reliably differentiated from control subjects on the basis of mean sensitivity to motion stimuli. The findings have two broad implications: first, that substantial neural loss specific for motion perception occurs during the processes of normal aging, and second, that sensitivity to motion targets per se may not be a useful indicator of neural integrity in the early stages of glaucoma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
H. K. Falkenberg and P. J. Bex
Sources of Motion-Sensitivity Loss in Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2913 - 2921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
E A Ansari, J E Morgan, and R J Snowden
Psychophysical characterisation of early functional loss in glaucoma and ocular hypertension
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2002; 86(10): 1131 - 1135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
E A Ansari, J E Morgan, and R J Snowden
Glaucoma: squaring the psychophysics and neurobiology
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2002; 86(7): 823 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
W. WESTLAKE
Is a one eyed racing driver safe to compete? Formula one (eye) or two?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2001; 85(5): 619 - 624.
[Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R A HITCHINGS
Selective ganglion cell death in glaucoma
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2000; 84(7): 678 - 679.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology