HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cregg, M. Articles by Sastry, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cregg, M. Articles by Sastry, P.

Accommodation and Refractive Error in Children with Down Syndrome: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies

¹ From the Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Wales; the ² Welsh Centre for Learning Disabilities, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff; and ³ Community Paediatrics, Cardiff Community Health Care, Splott Clinic, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To examine the relationship between defective accommodation and refractive errors in children with Down syndrome.

METHODS. Children with Down syndrome aged 4 to 85 months were seen at their homes as part of an ongoing study of visual development. Seventy-five children contributed cross-sectional data and 69 children longitudinal data. Accommodation was measured using a modification of Nott dynamic retinoscopy technique, and refractive error measurements were obtained using Mohindra retinoscopy.

RESULTS. Accommodation was poor, regardless of the refractive error present. The total accommodation produced by the children was related to the refractive error at the time of the test, with the degree of accommodation deficit increasing with the amount of positive refractive error. The longitudinal results showed that although children with Down syndrome did not accommodate accurately, the amount of accommodation elicited did not reflect their maximum amplitude of accommodation. Each child showed a consistent degree of underaccommodation for a given stimulus. Spectacles to correct hypermetropia did not improve the accommodative response.

CONCLUSIONS. In children with Down syndrome, underaccommodation is substantial, even when there is no, or a fully corrected, refractive error. The accommodation system of children with Down syndrome may have the physical capacity to respond to a given stimulus, but the neural control of the system has an anomalous set point. Spectacles do not remedy the situation. This has important implications, especially for children in a learning environment, because near vision is consistently out of focus.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-A. Little, J. M. Woodhouse, J. S. Lauritzen, and K. J. Saunders The Impact of Optical Factors on Resolution Acuity in Children with Down Syndrome Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 3995 - 4001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C E D van Isterdael, J S Stilma, P D Bezemer, and N T Tijmes 6220 institutionalised people with intellectual disability referred for visual assessment between 1993 and 2003: overview and trends Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1297 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. M. John, N. R. Bromham, J. M. Woodhouse, and T. R. Candy Spatial Vision Deficits in Infants and Children with Down Syndrome Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 1566 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N R Bromham, J M Woodhouse, M Cregg, E Webb, and W I Fraser Heart defects and ocular anomalies in children with Down's syndrome Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2002; 86(12): 1367 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]