| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 From the Blind Rehabilitation Center, Edward Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois; the 2 Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois; the 3 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; the 4 Chicago Health Care Network, West Side Division, Chicago, Illinois; and the 5 Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
PURPOSE. To evaluate the sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) to change in visual abilities after low-vision rehabilitation in two different Veterans Administration (VA) low-vision programs
METHODS. Seventy-seven legally blind veterans from the Blind Rehabilitation Center (BRC) at Hines VA Hospital and 51 partially sighted veterans from the Visual Impairment Center to Optimize Remaining Sight (VICTORS) program at the Chicago Health Care Network, West Side Division, were administered the NEI VFQ-25 plus supplement in interview format at admission and discharge. Instructions for administration were modified to have study participants answer all the questions as if they were wearing glasses or contact lenses or were using low-vision devices. Interval measures of person ability and item difficulty were estimated from the patients’ responses to 34 of the 39 items on the VFQ-25 plus supplement before and after rehabilitation, by the polytomous rating scale measurement model of Wright and Masters.
RESULTS. In VICTORS patients, item order by difficulty before rehabilitation agreed with item order for BRC patients. Visual ability scales are used similarly by different patients with different degrees of low vision. Based on prerehabilitation person measure distributions, VICTORS patients were less disabled, as would be predicted by visual acuity, than were BRC patients. After rehabilitation, estimated item difficulty for 4 of the 34 items decreased significantly in both BRC and VICTORS patients.
CONCLUSIONS. The present study demonstrates that the NEI VFQ-25 plus supplement can be used to measure the effects of low-vision rehabilitation; however, only 7 of the 34 items tested are sensitive to change after rehabilitation. Targeted activities, such as reading ordinary print, small print, and street signs are easier to perform for graduates of both programs after rehabilitation. The patients’ visual ability also shows improvement in both BRC and VICTORS. Improvement in visual ability is independent of change in difficulty of targeted items. Although this was not a controlled clinical trial, the decrease in difficulty of targeted items may reflect the use of low-vision aids and training to make tasks easier. The change in visual ability may reflect positive outcomes of rehabilitation or may be the consequence of patients’ overestimates of their functional ability at the time of discharge.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. d. Toit, A. Palagyi, J. Ramke, G. Brian, and E. L. Lamoureux Development and Validation of a Vision-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Timor-Leste Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4284 - 4289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Stelmack, X. C. Tang, D. J. Reda, S. Rinne, R. M. Mancil, R. W. Massof, and for the LOVIT Study Group Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT) Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2008; 126(5): 608 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A Stelmack, X. C. Tang, D. J. Reda, D. Moran, S. Rinne, R. M. Mancil, R. Cummings, G. Mancil, K. Stroupe, N. Ellis, et al. The Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT): Design and Methodology Clinical Trials, December 1, 2007; 4(6): 650 - 660. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Lamoureux, J. F. Pallant, K. Pesudovs, G. Rees, J. B. Hassell, and J. E. Keeffe The Effectiveness of Low-Vision Rehabilitation on Participation in Daily Living and Quality of Life Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1476 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. L. Lamoureux, J. F. Pallant, K. Pesudovs, J. B. Hassell, and J. E. Keeffe The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: An Evaluation of Its Measurement Properties using Rasch Analysis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4732 - 4741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Horowitz, M. Brennan, J. P. Reinhardt, and T. MacMillan The impact of assistive device use on disability and depression among older adults with age-related vision impairments. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., September 1, 2006; 61(5): S274 - S280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Stelmack, J. P. Szlyk, T. R. Stelmack, P. Demers-Turco, R. T. Williams, D. Moran, and R. W. Massof Measuring outcomes of vision rehabilitation with the veterans affairs low vision visual functioning questionnaire. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3253 - 3261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to Progression to Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Vision Loss, and Lens Opacity: AREDS Report No. 14 Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2005; 123(9): 1207 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. Smith, C. M. Dickinson, I. Cacho, B. C. Reeves, and R. A. Harper A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Effectiveness of Prism Spectacles for Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2005; 123(8): 1042 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T H Margrain, B Ryan, and J M Wild A revolution in Welsh low vision service provision Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2005; 89(8): 933 - 934. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Stelmack, J. P. Szlyk, T. R. Stelmack, P. Demers-Turco, R. T. Williams, D. Moran, and R. W. Massof Psychometric Properties of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 3919 - 3928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Nutheti, B. R. Shamanna, S. Krishnaiah, V. K. Gothwal, R. Thomas, and G. N. Rao Perceived Visual Ability for Functional Vision Performance among Persons with Low Vision in the Indian State of Andhra Pradesh Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 3458 - 3465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Gieser When Treatment Fails: Caring for Patients With Visual Disability Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2004; 122(8): 1208 - 1209. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B A Noble, R S K Loh, S MacLennan, K Pesudovs, A Reynolds, L R Bridges, J Burr, O Stewart, and S Quereshi Comparison of autologous serum eye drops with conventional therapy in a randomised controlled crossover trial for ocular surface disease Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2004; 88(5): 647 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
