IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:610-617.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.02-0240

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Holder, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Holder, G. E.

Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Differences between Early- and Late-Onset Strabismic Amblyopia

Alison R. Davis,1 John J. Sloper,1 Majella M. Neveu,1 Chris R. Hogg,1 Michael J. Morgan,2 and Graham E. Holder1

1From the Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom, and the 2City University, London, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To compare visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and contrast sensitivity in adults with early- or late-onset strabismic amblyopia.

METHODS. Twelve adults with early- and 12 with late-onset strabismic amblyopia with similar ranges of visual acuity were studied. Pattern-onset VEPs to 30-minute checks were recorded at a range of contrast levels. Contrast sensitivity (CS) was measured at 3.2 cyc/deg using a two-alternative, forced-choice staircase method.

RESULTS. There was no significant difference in VEP CII latency or amplitude between amblyopic and fellow eyes across all contrast levels for the early-onset group, but in the late-onset group, CII latencies were significantly longer and amplitudes smaller in the amblyopic eye. CII responses in both amblyopic and fellow eyes of the early-onset amblyopes were of significantly shorter latency and smaller amplitude than normal. In the late-onset group the CII responses from the amblyopic eye were of significantly increased latency and reduced amplitude compared with normal, whereas latency and amplitude of fellow eye responses did not differ significantly from normal. Late-onset amblyopes showed reduced CS across the central field for the amblyopic eye, but increased CS for the fellow eye compared with normal. In the early-onset group, central CS did not differ between amblyopic and fellow eyes or from normal.

CONCLUSIONS. There are significant differences in the electrophysiological and psychophysical characteristics of adults with early- and late-onset strabismic amblyopia.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. R. Davis, J. J. Sloper, M. M. Neveu, C. R. Hogg, M. J. Morgan, and G. E. Holder
Differential Changes in Color and Motion-Onset Visual Evoked Potentials from Both Eyes in Early- and Late-Onset Strabismic Amblyopia
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4418 - 4426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. R. Davis, J. J. Sloper, M. M. Neveu, C. R. Hogg, M. J. Morgan, and G. E. Holder
Differential Changes of Magnocellular and Parvocellular Visual Function in Early- and Late-Onset Strabismic Amblyopia
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4836 - 4841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. B. Hoffmann, B. Lorenz, A. B. Morland, and L. C. Schmidtborn
Misrouting of the Optic Nerves in Albinism: Estimation of the Extent with Visual Evoked Potentials
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3892 - 3898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology