HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ikram, M. K. Articles by de Jong, P. T. V. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ikram, M. K. Articles by de Jong, P. T. V. M.

Relationship between Refraction and Prevalent as well as Incident Age-Related Maculopathy: The Rotterdam Study

¹From the Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and ²Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; ³The Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute, Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and ⁴Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE. To study the relationship between baseline spherical equivalents (SphE) of refraction and prevalent as well as incident age-related maculopathy (pARM and iARM, respectively).

METHODS. The study was performed as part of the Rotterdam Study, a population-based, prospective cohort study. The SphE (in diopters), measured with autorefraction and subjective optimization, was recorded in 6209 subjects aged 55 years or more. Aphakic or pseudophakic eyes at baseline were excluded. Stereoscopic transparencies of the macular region were graded according to the International Classification and Grading System. ARM was defined as large soft drusen with pigmentary changes, or indistinct drusen, or atrophic or neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). For the prevalence analyses, ARM was classified into no, p(early)ARM, or pAMD, and in each subject the eye with the most advanced ARM and the corresponding refraction was selected. After a mean 5.2 years of follow-up, 4935 subjects had complete data for these incidence analyses. In each subject, the eye with iARM was selected.

RESULTS. The age- and gender-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of pARM (n = 536) for every diopter of progress toward hyperopia was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]1.04–1.13). For p(early)ARM (n = 440) the OR was 1.09 (1.04–1.14) and for pAMD (n = 96) the OR was 1.09 (1.00–1.19). Baseline refraction was significantly associated with increased risk of iARM (n = 497). For each diopter of progress toward hyperopia the OR was 1.05 (95% CI 1.01–1.10). Additional adjustments for smoking, atherosclerosis, and blood pressure did not alter the relationship.

CONCLUSIONS. These population-based incidence data confirm results from prevalence and case-control studies that there is an association between hyperopia and ARM.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Vitale, L. Ellwein, M. F. Cotch, F. L. Ferris III, and R. Sperduto Prevalence of Refractive Error in the United States, 1999-2004 Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2008; 126(8): 1111 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Chang, S. B. Bressler, B. Munoz, and S. K. West Racial Differences and Other Risk Factors for Incidence and Progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Project Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2395 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Mellem-Kairala, A. E. Elsner, A. Weber, R. B. Simmons, and S. A. Burns Improved Contrast of Peripapillary Hyperpigmentation Using Polarization Analysis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 1099 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Friedman Update of the vascular model of AMD Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2004; 88(2): 161 - 163. [Full Text]

eLetters: