IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2004;45:2539-2542.)
© 2004 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.03-1198

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Keeffe, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Keeffe, J. E.

The Need for Routine Eye Examinations

Hugh R. Taylor,1 Hien T. V. Vu,1 Catherine A. McCarty,1,2 and Jill E. Keeffe1

1From the Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and the 2Marshfield Medical Research Foundation, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin.

PURPOSE. To determine the incidence and causes of vision loss to assist in the objective determination of the preferred frequency of routine screening for those with normal vision.

METHODS. A prospective, population-based study of people aged 40 or more years. Standardized examination protocols were used that included presenting and best corrected visual acuity, visual field testing, and comprehensive eye examination with dilation.

RESULTS. There were 2529 people with a full data set, including 1590 with a normal baseline examination. The 5-year incidence of vision loss (<6/12 presenting acuity in the worse eye) was 2.39%. Overall, 24 (63%) of 38 of those with vision loss had noticed a change in their vision, and 18 (75%) of these 24 had attended an eye examination. This left only 14 (0.88%) people who had had normal baseline examination results and had asymptomatic vision loss develop over this 5-year period.

CONCLUSIONS. Frequent routine eye examinations of those with normal examination results will have a low yield and may not be cost effective. Health promotion messages should target those who notice a change in vision and those at higher risk such as those with diabetes or a family history of eye disease.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J S Rahi, C S Peckham, and P M Cumberland
Visual impairment due to undiagnosed refractive error in working age adults in Britain
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2008; 92(9): 1190 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology