IOVS Pharmacological Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:398-407.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0959

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmucker, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmucker, C.
Right arrow Articles by Schaeffel, F.

Grating Acuity at Different Luminances in Wild-Type Mice and in Mice Lacking Rod or Cone Function

Christine Schmucker,1 Mathias Seeliger,2 Pete Humphries,3 Martin Biel,4 and Frank Schaeffel1

1From the Section of Neurobiology of the Eye and the 2Retinal Electrodiagnostics Research Group, University Eye Hospital, Tübingen, Germany; the 3Department of Genetics, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; and the 4Institute of Pharmacology, Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

PURPOSE. The mouse eye has become an important model in vision research. However, it is not known how visual acuity changes with luminance. Therefore, grating acuity of mice was measured at different luminances in an automated optomotor paradigm. Furthermore, mutant mice lacking either rods (RHO–/– and CNGB1–/–) or cones (CNGA3–/–), or both, were studied to determine the rod and cone contribution to visual acuity.

METHODS. Freely ranging individual mice were automatically tracked at a 25-Hz sampling rate with a self-programmed video system in a large rotating optomotor drum. The drum had a square-wave grating inside with adjustable spatial frequency. The angular speed of the mice with respect to the center of the drum and the angular orientation of the snout-tail body axis were analyzed. In addition, the motor activity of the wild-type mice was recorded at different luminances.

RESULTS. The optomotor drum provided reliable data on visual input to the mouse’s behavior and was convenient to use, since the experimenter’s had only to place the mice individually in a Perspex cylinder. Optomotor grating acuity of the wild-type mice was limited to 0.3 to 0.4 cyc/deg. Maximum optomotor responses were obtained at 0.1 to 0.2 cyc/deg. The importance of visual input declined monotonically with decreasing luminance (30 cd/m2, 100%; 0.1 cd/m2, 76.4%; 0.005 cd/m2, 45.9%; and darkness, –9%). Mice lacking functional rods were able to resolve gratings up to 0.1 cyc/deg at 30 cd/m2. Surprisingly, mice lacking functional cones had an optomotor acuity that was similar to the wild-type. Double-knockout mice without rods and cones had no detectable grating acuity.

CONCLUSIONS. Because the visual system of the mouse is more responsive at bright luminances, experiments in which visual input is important should be performed in photopic conditions (30 cd/m2 or even more). Apparently, spatial vision is governed by the rod system, which is not saturated in the mesopic or low photopic range. Mice lacking both rods and cones have no detectable grating acuity, indicating that the retinal melanopsin system does not contribute to spatial vision.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Beraneck and K. E. Cullen
Activity of Vestibular Nuclei Neurons During Vestibular and Optokinetic Stimulation in the Alert Mouse
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1549 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
R. D. Lund, S. Wang, B. Lu, S. Girman, T. Holmes, Y. Sauve, D. J. Messina, I. R. Harris, A. J. Kihm, A. M. Harmon, et al.
Cells Isolated from Umbilical Cord Tissue Rescue Photoreceptors and Visual Functions in a Rodent Model of Retinal Disease
Stem Cells, March 1, 2007; 25(3): 602 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Schippert, E. Burkhardt, M. Feldkaemper, and F. Schaeffel
Relative Axial Myopia in Egr-1 (ZENK) Knockout Mice
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 11 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology