IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:2760-2765.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0260

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dayan, Y. B.
Right arrow Articles by Benyamini, O. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dayan, Y. B.
Right arrow Articles by Benyamini, O. G.

The Changing Prevalence of Myopia in Young Adults: A 13-Year Series of Population-Based Prevalence Surveys

Yosefa Bar Dayan,1,2 Avi Levin,1,2 Yair Morad,3 Itamar Grotto,1 Rachel Ben-David,1 Avishai Goldberg,4 Erez Onn,1 Isaac Avni,3 Yehezkel Levi,1 and Oren Gil Benyamini3

1From the Surgeon General Headquarters, Israeli Defense Forces Medical Corps, Israel; the 3Ophthalmology Department, "Assaf-Harofeh" Medical Center, Zrifin, Israel; and the 4Faculty of Medicine, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheba, Israel.

PURPOSE. To determine the changing prevalence of myopia during the years 1990 through 2002 among the 16- to 22-year age group and identify possible risk factors.

METHODS. A retrospective study, based on 13 repeated prevalence surveys conducted over a 13-year period. The study subjects were all Israeli nationals belonging to the 16- to 22-year age group from the years 1990 to 2002. Refraction was determined by using subjective visual acuity followed by noncycloplegic autorefraction and subjective validation based on the autorefraction results. Mild myopia was defined as a refractive error of –0.50 to –3.00 D in at least one eye, moderate myopia as –3.25 to –6.00 D, and high myopia as more than –6.00 D.

RESULTS. There were 919,929 subjects (382,139 [42%] females and 537,790 [58%] males) included in the study. The overall prevalence of myopia increased from 20.3% in 1990 to 28.3% in 2002. The prevalence of high, moderate, and mild myopia significantly increased in males from 1.7%, 5.7%, and 11.6% in 1990 to 2.05%, 7.2%, and 16.3% in 2002, respectively (P < 0.001). In females, the prevalence of myopia increased from 1.9%, 6.6%, and 13.5% in 1990 to 2.4%, 9.2%, and 20.7% in 2002, respectively (P < 0.001). A correlation between myopia and the number of years of education was observed. Non-Israeli origin was found to be a significant risk factor for myopia.

CONCLUSIONS. During the 13 years from 1990 to 2002, the prevalence of myopia significantly increased among the Israeli population. Although there was an association with the level of education, gender, ethnicity, and origin, the prevalence of myopia increased on an annual basis, independent of these factors.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
Z. Yang, W. Lan, W. Liu, X. Chen, H. Nie, M. Yu, and J. Ge
Association of Ocular Dominance and Myopia Development: A 2-Year Longitudinal Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 4779 - 4783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. M. Ip, K. A. Rose, I. G. Morgan, G. Burlutsky, and P. Mitchell
Myopia and the Urban Environment: Findings in a Sample of 12-Year-Old Australian School Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3858 - 3863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. Vitale, L. Ellwein, M. F. Cotch, F. L. Ferris III, and R. Sperduto
Prevalence of Refractive Error in the United States, 1999-2004
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2008; 126(8): 1111 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C Williams, L L Miller, G Gazzard, and S M Saw
A comparison of measures of reading and intelligence as risk factors for the development of myopia in a UK cohort of children
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2008; 92(8): 1117 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Chia, A. Jaurigue, G. Gazzard, Y. Wang, D. Tan, R. A. Stone, and S. M. Saw
Ocular Dominance, Laterality, and Refraction in Singaporean Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 3533 - 3536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. M. Ip, S. C. Huynh, D. Robaei, K. A. Rose, I. G. Morgan, W. Smith, A. Kifley, and P. Mitchell
Ethnic Differences in the Impact of Parental Myopia: Findings from a Population-Based Study of 12-Year-Old Australian Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2520 - 2528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S M Steidl
How does visual acuity change over time in adults with high myopia?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2006; 90(5): 524 - 524.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
Y-F Shih, T-C Ho, C K Hsiao, and L L-K Lin
Visual outcomes for high myopic patients with or without myopic maculopathy: a 10 year follow up study
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2006; 90(5): 546 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology