IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1966;5:256-263.)
© 1966 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimo-oku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jampel, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shimo-oku, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jampel, R. S.

Midbrain Electrical Fields Produced by Stimulation of the Muscle Branches of the Oculomotor Nerve

Masashi Shimo-oku 1 and Robert S. Jampel 1

1 Institute of Ophthalmology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center New York, N. Y.

Evoked potentials were recorded from the oculomotor nucleus in decerebrate cats following electrical stimulation of individual muscle branches of the oculomotor nerve. These potentials were usually triphasic but other more complex potentials were evoked depending on the positions of the recording electrode. Equipotential contour maps of the evoked electrical fields were plotted at different time intervals following the stimulation of the individual nerve branches. These maps provideda dynamic picture of the electrical field changes in the nucleus. Potentials evoked from individual extraocular muscles predominated in different regions of the nucleus. Potentials from the inferior rectus muscle predominated in the rostral homolateral part of the nucleus, from the medial rectus in the middle part of the nucleus, and from the inferior oblique in the most caudal part of the nucleus. Maximum evoked potentials from the superior rectus were obtained in the contralateral caudal part of the nucleus, but many potentials were also recorded from the homolateral middle and caudal parts. It, therefore, appeared reasonable to assume that the superior rectus muscle was bilaterally innervated. This assumption was further supported by retrograde degeneration studies in the oculomotor nucleus







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology