IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1966;5:497-507.)
© 1966 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CARR, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by WEALE, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CARR, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by WEALE, R. A.

Rhodopsin and the Electrical Activity of the Retina in Congenital Night Blindness

R. E. CARR 1, H. RIPPS 1, I. M. SIEGEL 1, and R. A. WEALE 2

1 Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Medical Center New York, N. Y.
2 Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Medical Center New York, N. Y.; Department of Physiological Optics, Institute of Ophthalmology, Judd Street, London, W. C l.

The inability of night-blind persons to see at low levels of illumination is usually attributed to a defect involving the biosynthesis of the visual pigment, rhodopsin. Accordingly, it has been assumed that the retinal rods of the congenital nyctalope are deficient in rhodopsin or its precursors. To test this hypothesis, fundus refiectometry was performed on two subjects, each having adifferent form of congenital night blindness (dominant and recessive, respectively). In both subjects, the concentration of rhodopsin and the rate at which it regenerated after bleaching were normal. Clearly, a photochemical basis for this anomaly is untenable. However, the electrophysiological responses of these subjects showed distinct abnormalities: (a) In the case of recessive inheritance, there toas a normal light rise in the eye's standing potential, normal a-wave potentials in the ERG, but a very much reduced scotopic b-wave. (b) In the dominant form, the light rise in the standing potential was abnormal, and all ERG responses were markedly depressed. These findings implicate the neural transmission pathways as the locus of disturbance in this anomaly. In view of a normal photochemistry, analysis of the results suggests that both the a-wave of the ERG and the light rise in the standing potential originate proximal to the outer segments of the receptors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
S. S Sidiki, R. Hamilton, and G. N Dutton
Lesson of the week: Fear of the dark in children: is stationary night blindness the cause?
BMJ, January 25, 2003; 326(7382): 211 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Kondo, Y. Miyake, N. Kondo, A. Tanikawa, S. Suzuki, M. Horiguchi, and H. Terasaki
Multifocal ERG Findings in Complete Type Congenital Stationary Night Blindness
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2001; 42(6): 1342 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G. Balkema, N. Mangini, and L. Pinto
Discrete visual defects in pearl mutant mice
Science, March 4, 1983; 219(4588): 1085 - 1087.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology