IOVS Physiological Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1969;8:484-487.)
© 1969 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELLISON, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by LITTLE, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ELLISON, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by LITTLE, J. M.

Comparison of Methods for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Ocular Adenovirus Type 3 Infection

EMILY D. ELLISON 1, HERBERT E. KAUFMAN 1, and JOHN M. LITTLE 1

1 Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla

In this volunteer study of an induced adenovirus type 3 infection, fluorescent antibody staining, and the examination of conjunctival cytology by Giemsa and Papan'colaou stains were not diagnostically useful. Virus isolations and antibody rises were the only suitable laboratory indications of infection.

Key Words: adenovirus infections • adenovirus group • fluorescent antibody technique • conjunctiva • virus isolation • antibody • negative study






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology