|
|
||||||||
1 From the Department of Biochemistry and 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Expression of FasL and Fas in cultured hRPE cells was examined by Western blot analysis and flow cytometry. The susceptibility of hRPE cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis was determined by incubating cells with recombinant soluble Fas ligand (sFasL). Characteristics of apoptosis assessed included chromatin condensation, DNA cleavage, and phosphatidylserine exposure. To investigate the possible involvement of Fas-mediated apoptosis in oxidative killing of hRPE cells, the effects of the oxidant tert-butylhydroperoxide (tBH) on the expression of FasL and Fas were studied. The specificity of effects of oxidant was examined using the antioxidants glutathione and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). The requirement for the Fas pathway in tBH-induced apoptosis was investigated using an antagonistic anti-Fas antibody ZB4 that blocks the interaction between FasL and Fas.
RESULTS. Cultured hRPE cells constitutively expressed FasL and Fas. Ligation of Fas receptor with recombinant sFasL triggered apoptosis in hRPE cells. tBH treatment of hRPE cells resulted in increased expression of FasL and Fas. Glutathione and NAC completely abrogated tBH-induced increase in FasL and Fas expression and apoptosis. Blocking FasL and Fas interaction by ZB4 inhibited tBH-induced apoptosis, but only partially.
CONCLUSIONS. A functional Fas-mediated apoptotic pathway is present in cultured hRPE cells and can be activated with sFasL or by upregulation of FasL and Fas expression with an oxidant. The incomplete inhibition by blocking antibody indicates that the Fas pathway is involved in oxidant-induced apoptosis, but other triggering mechanisms are also important.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The molecular mechanism for the injury to RPE cells is not understood clearly. We have recently shown that the pro-oxidant tert-butylhydroperoxide (tBH) induces apoptosis in cultured hRPE cells.3 Apoptosis is a form of cell death characterized by chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, and phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization.4 Besides pro-oxidants, other stimuli such as experimental ischemia, light exposure, and protein kinase inhibitors are also reported to trigger apoptosis in RPE in vitro.5 6 7 In the highly vascularized choroidal neovascular membrane surgically excised from eyes of patients with ARMD, extensive apoptosis in RPE cells has been observed, suggesting that apoptosis of RPE cells is involved in the pathogenesis of ARMD.8
In many systems, apoptosis is mediated by the interaction between Fas ligand (FasL) and Fas.9 10 FasL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor family of cytokines. Its receptor Fas belongs to the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. Binding of FasL or an agonistic anti-Fas antibody to Fas initiates a signal transduction pathway for apoptosis in susceptible cells. FasL and Fas are constitutively expressed in a wide range of tissues. The Fas system provides an important mechanism for regulation of immune response and killing of tumor cells. A malfunction of Fas system has been found to contribute to the development of many diseases including cancer, acquired immune deficiency syndrome, hepatitis, and autoimmune diseases.9 10
A substantial expression of FasL has been found in the corneal epithelium and endothelium, iris, ciliary cells, and retina of eyes and has led to the proposal that FasL participates in maintenance of the immune privilege of the eye by inducing apoptosis in infiltrating, Fas-bearing, activated lymphocytes.11 12 In the normal eye, FasL is weakly expressed in the RPE monolayer.8 However, an increased FasL expression has been found in the RPE monolayer of the choroidal neovascular membranes from patients with ARMD.8 The FasL expressed on RPE cells may be necessary for immune privilege of the posterior of the eye. However, if its expression is upregulated or if the expression of Fas in RPE cells is increased, death signals could be activated. Affected cells may undergo apoptosis (suicide) or cause paracrine-induced death of neighboring cells (fratricide). Indeed, in the highly vascularized choroidal neovascular membrane from the eye of patients with ARMD, a correlation between Fas expression and the extent of apoptosis exists, although the association between FasL expression and apoptosis is not found.8 A study by Esser et al.13 has demonstrated that cultured human (h)RPE cells constitutively express Fas but are rather resistant to apoptosis by an agonistic Fas antibody. However, upregulation of Fas expression in hRPE by cytokines can overcome the resistance to the agonistic Fas antibody.
Cytokine treatment is normally accompanied by oxidative stress, and reactive oxygen intermediates (ROI) are involved in the induction of FasL expression by cytostatic drugs and T-cell activation.14 15 Pro-oxidants are found to upregulate FasL expression and enhance Fas-mediated apoptosis.14 15 In Fas-mediated apoptosis, generation of ROIs is an early signaling event, and inhibiting its production with antioxidants can prevent apoptosis.16 17 All this evidence suggests that ROI is a key regulator of the Fas system. However, the contribution of the Fas pathway to oxidant-induced apoptosis in the RPE cells has not been established. Thus, in the present study, we investigated whether the Fas system mediates apoptosis in cultured hRPE cells and whether it could be modulated by an oxidant and contribute to oxidative injury of RPE.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Western Blot Analysis of FasL and Fas Protein
Cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and
then lysed in a boiling solution containing 10% glycerol, 250 mM Tris
(pH 6.8), 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 2% ß-mercaptoethanol. The
cell lysates were immediately boiled for 5 minutes and centrifuged at
10,000g for 5 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was
collected, and the amount of protein was measured by the Bradford
method. Protein extracts (50 µg/lane) were loaded onto a 10% sodium
dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel, and the separated proteins were
blotted to 0.45 µm polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond;
Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Nonspecific binding was blocked by
incubating the membranes overnight at 4°C in a blocking buffer
containing 5% nonfat dry milk, 0.1% Tween-20, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5),
and 100 mM NaCl. The membranes were then stained with 1:2500 diluted
anti-Fas antibody or 1:1000 diluted anti-FasL antibody (F37720 and
F22120; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) in blocking buffer
for 1 hour at room temperature with agitation. After they were washed
three times with washing buffer containing 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM
NaCl, and 0.1% Tween-20, the membranes were incubated with 1:3000
diluted horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse antibody in blocking
buffer for 1 hour at room temperature. The specific proteins were then
visualized by incubating the membranes with reagent (Renaissance
Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagent; NEN, Boston, MA) and exposing
the membranes to film (X-OMAT; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Equal
protein loading was verified by ponceau red treatment of membranes.
Flow Cytometric Detection of FasL and Fas on Cell Surface
Cells (2 x 105) were washed twice in
washing buffer containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin and 0.02% sodium
azide in PBS and incubated with 2.5 µg/ml a rabbit anti-FasL antibody
C20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or a mouse anti-Fas
antibody DX2 (Oncogene) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then
washed, resuspended in 50 µl washing buffer containing 2.5 µg/ml
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)conjugated anti-rabbit IgG or goat
anti-mouse IgG, respectively, and incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C.
Nonstaining cells, cells stained with the FITC-conjugated secondary
antibodies alone, and cells stained with isotypically matched control
immunoglobulin were run in parallel as negative controls. After
staining, cells were washed twice in washing buffer and resuspended in
PBS. Data acquisition and analysis were performed in a flow cytometer
(FACScan using the CellQuest software; Becton Dickinson, Mountain View,
CA).
Visualization of Apoptotic Nuclei by Confocal Microscopy
hRPE cells grown in chambered coverglass were incubated with sFasL
for 48 hours. Cells remaining on the coverglass after treatment were
washed twice with PBS and fixed with ice-cold 80% methanol for 30
minutes. Cells were then gently washed three times and stained with 50
µg/ml propidium iodide in PBS for 5 minutes at room temperature. The
coverglass were analyzed by laser scanning confocal microscope (model
1024; BioRad, Richmond, CA).
Assessment of Apoptosis by TdT-Mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling
TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) was performed using a
kit (In Situ Cell Death Detection kit with fluorescein;
BoehringerMannheim, Mannheim, Germany) according to the standard
protocol provided by the manufacturer. Briefly, after treatment, both
floating and adherent (released by trypsin) cells were collected and
washed twice with PBS. Cells were fixed with freshly prepared 4%
paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) for 30 minutes at room temperature and
then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate for
2 minutes on ice. To label DNA strand breaks, cells were incubated with
50 µl TUNEL reaction mixture containing terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase and fluorescein-dUTP in the binding buffer and incubated
for 1 hour at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere. Cells were then washed
twice with PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry. Alternatively, cells
grown on chambered coverglasses were incubated with sFasL for 48 hours.
Cells remaining on the coverglass were washed twice with PBS and
stained with the TUNEL kit as described. The coverglasses were analyzed
by laser scanning confocal microscopy.
Assessment of Apoptosis by Annexin V-FITC Staining of PS
Cells were stained with annexin VFITC (TACS; Trevigen,
Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Briefly, after treatment, both floating and adherent cells were
collected and washed twice with PBS. Cells were then resuspended in 100
µl binding buffer containing 10 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 5
mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, and 1 mg/ml
annexin-VFITC. After 15 minutes of incubation at room temperature in
the dark, 400 µl binding buffer was added, and cells were analyzed by
flow cytometry.
Total RNA Preparation and Reverse TranscriptionPolymerase Chain
Reaction for Fas mRNA and FasL mRNA
Total RNA was prepared with a kit (RNeasy, Qiagen,
Chatsworth, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Single-stranded DNA was synthesized from RNA in a 15-µl reaction
mixture containing 100 ng random hexamer and 200 units of murine MLV
reverse transcriptase (Gibco, Grand Island, NY). The reaction mixture
was diluted with 20 µl water and 2 µl of which was used for
polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR reaction mixture contained 10
picomoles each of forward and reverse primers and 2 units DNA
polymerase (Taq; Perkin-Elmer, Branchburg, NJ).
Amplification was performed for 30 cycles in a thermal cycler. Each
cycle consisted of 1 minute of denaturation at 94°C, 1 minute of
annealing at 57°C, and 1 minute of extension at 72°C. The sequences
of primers used for analysis were as follows: Fas (forward:
5'-CGGAGGATTGCTCAACAAC-3', reverse:
5'-TTGGTATTCTGGGTCCG-3'),19
FasL (forward:
5'-GTTTGCTGGGGCTGGCCTGACT-3', reverse:
5'-GGAAAGAATCCCAAAGTGCTTC-3'),20
and ß-actin (forward:
5'-CGTGG GCCGCCCTAGGCACCA-3', reverse:
5'-TTGGCCTTAGGGTTCAGGGGGG-3').21
The PCR products were
separated on 1% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide
staining. The quantities of the PCR products were determined by
densitometric scanning using Lynx software (Applied Imaging, Santa
Clara, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Induction of FasL and Fas Expression by tBH and Inhibition by
Antioxidants
Although RPE cells express both FasL and Fas, they may not undergo
suicide or fratricide if their expression levels are lower than the
threshold for initiating Fas ligation or if the Fas-mediated signaling
cascade is inhibited by regulatory components.9
10
However, if stimuli can induce FasL or Fas expression in RPE and result
in activation of the Fas-mediated signaling pathway, apoptosis may be
triggered. Our previous study has shown that the oxidant tBH can induce
apoptosis in cultured hRPE cells.3
Because oxidants
upregulate FasL expression in other cell types,14
15
23
we
investigated whether the Fas pathway could mediate tBH-induced
apoptosis in cultured hRPE cells. We first examined whether tBH affects
expression of FasL protein in cultured hRPE. By Western blot, an
increase in the expression of total FasL was detected in tBH-treated
hRPE cells after 1 hour, and it decreased after 4 hours (Fig. 5A
). When cell surface FasL was measured by flow cytometry, the
histogram, plotted as FasL expression against cell number, demonstrated
that untreated hRPE cells showed a basal expression of cell surface
FasL. After tBH treatment, hRPE revealed a marked upregulation in FasL
expression (Fig. 5B)
. The increase started 1 hour after treatment and
continued to increase during incubation up to 6 hours. Dot plot
analysis of FasL expression versus forward side scatter (FSC,
indicating cell size) showed that the cells undergoing apoptosis after
tBH treatment (shown here as cell shrinkage with decreased FSC) had
higher FasL expression.
|
To obtain further insight into the mechanism of tBH-induced apoptosis, we also analyzed Fas expression on tBH treatment. The Western blot data show that tBH treatment of RPE cells caused an increase in total Fas expression at 3 hours (Fig. A ). tBH also induced cell surface Fas expression (Fig. 6B) . The increase in cell surface Fas began 1 hour after treatment and occurred earlier than the increase in total Fas. RT-PCR data demonstrated that tBH-induced upregulation of Fas was also associated with transcriptional activation of gene expression (1.4-fold increase in Fas mRNA, Fig. 6C ). Together, these results suggest that hRPE cells may first translocate the preexisting intracellular Fas to the cell surface and then transcribe and translate more Fas. Compared with tBH-induced FasL expression, the effect of tBH on Fas was less prominent.
|
|
To further elucidate the involvement of the Fas-mediated death pathway in tBH-induced apoptosis, hRPE cells were preincubated with an antagonistic anti-Fas antibody ZB4 before treatment with tBH. This antibody completely blocked Fas-mediated apoptosis in hRPE cells (Fig. 3B) and human T leukemia Jurkat cells (data not shown). However, pretreatment of hRPE cells with ZB4 only partially inhibited tBH-induced apoptosis in hRPE cells (Fig. 8) . This suggests that tBH-induced apoptosis is mediated, at least in part, through a death signal activated by the increased FasL that binds to the increased Fas in RPE cells. However, the data are also consistent with another mechanisms having a role in activation of apoptosis in hRPE cells, such as the previously documented mitochondrial-activated pathway.3
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we have examined an alternative mechanismnamely, activation by the plasma membrane Fas receptor. Rapid progress has been achieved during recent years in the elucidation of the signaling pathway of Fas-mediated apoptosis.9 10 Fas ligation by FasL or by agonistic anti-Fas antibody can result in oligomerization of receptors in the cell membrane and formation of a death-inducing signal complex that includes the adapter protein Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and leads to the activation of caspase 8. The activated caspase 8 then propagates the apoptotic signal by activating downstream proteins through proteolytic cleavage. Among the proteins activated by this cascade are caspase 3 and BID. BID is a proapoptotic protein that triggers mitochondrial release of cytochrome c, which in turn activates caspases 9 and 3.28 29 Thus, in principle, activation of the Fas pathway could contribute to the mitochondrial changes in tBH-treated RPE cells that we have previously reported.
In this study, we show that cultured hRPE cells constitutively express low levels of FasL but relatively high levels of Fas. Under normal culture conditions, these expression levels are insufficient to activate apoptosis because apoptosis occurred at only a low level in untreated cells. However, when oligomerization of Fas was facilitated with a high concentration of recombinant sFasL or the agonistic anti-Fas antibody CH-11 (data not shown), apoptosis was induced. Compared with other Fas-expressing cells, such as human T leukemia Jurkat cells, hRPE cells appeared less sensitive to Fas-mediated apoptosis. Only 20% to 40% of RPE cells underwent apoptosis after 48 hours, whereas more than 80% of Jurkat cells undergo apoptosis under these condition.30 This difference may be due to blocking of the Fas pathway in RPE cells by intracellular inhibitors. hRPE cells are found to have a very high level of intracellular Zn2+, which is a potent inhibitor of caspase 3 and endonucleases.31 32 33
Our data show that, besides sFasL, Fas-mediated apoptosis could also be induced in RPE cells by oxidative stress. Treatment of RPE cells with the oxidant tBH resulted in increased FasL and Fas expression; blocking FasL and Fas interaction with an antagonistic antibody inhibited tBH-induced apoptosis. However, unlike the antioxidants that completely inhibited tBH-induced apoptosis, the antagonist antibody only partially inhibited apoptosis. This suggests that the Fas-mediated pathway is involved in tBH-induced apoptosis but serves as only one of multiple death-signaling mechanisms triggered by the oxidant. Therefore, mitochondrial damage previously observed in tBH-treated cells may occur in part through a Fas pathway that involves sequential events including activation of caspase 8, cleavage of BID, and damage of mitochondria and also by an alteration of mitochondria components directly by ROIs or by a shift in intracellular or intramitochondrial redox status.34
The present findings could have significant clinical importance. Although sensitivity to oxidant-induced apoptosis by a mitochondrial mechanism could increase because of life-long accumulation of genome damage in the mitochondrial DNA, this sensitivity may not be readily reversible by antioxidant treatments.34 However, the Fas-mediated pathway appears to be potentiated by increased FasL and Fas expression, and this could be suppressed by antioxidants. In vitro studies have demonstrated that many factors can induce FasL expression and stimulate release of sFasL. These include T-cell activation, phagocytosis, viral infection, metalloproteinase activation, and oxidative stress.14 15 35 36 37 38 A number of studies suggest that oxidative damage in the RPE cells may contribute to the pathology of ARMD.18 24 25 26 27 Therefore, a mechanism for oxidative injury of RPE cells in ARMD may involve upregulation of FasL in T cells or other cell types. When cells with increased FasL infiltrate to the subretinal space, they may facilitate oligomerization of Fas receptors on RPE cells and kill them. In healthy, noninflamed eyes, Bruchs membrane may protect against cells infiltrating from the choriocapillaris.1 However, Bruchs membrane function may be impaired in inflamed eyes. Moreover, T cells and monocyte/macrophages can also enter the subretinal space adjacent to the RPE cells through retinal capillaries. Indeed, the presence of T cells in the subretinal space has been found in the rat with experimental autoimmune uveitis.39 In exudative ARMD, a choroidal neovascular membrane grows under or through the retinal pigment epithelium through breaks in Brushs membrane.2 The endothelial cells of this neovascular net lack tight junctions, and therefore fluid and blood leak into the subpigment epithelial layer of the retina.40 This could attract more cells that express high FasL, such as activated T cells and activated macrophages, allow access to FasL-bearing endothelial cells, or exposure to circulating sFasL and thereby cause death of RPE cells. Thus, if Fas-mediated apoptosis contributes to pathogenesis of ARMD, it may be involved both in the initiation and progression of the disease.
Although there are no data showing an increase of sFasL in the sera of ARMD patients, an elevation of sFasL has been observed in several diseases including large granular lymphocytic leukemia, natural killer cell lymphoma, hemophagocytic syndrome, DiamondBlackfan anemia, and hepatitis.41 42 43 Therefore, besides the infiltrating cells that express high FasL, a high level of serum sFasL could also facilitate Fas ligation in Fas-expressing RPE cells and cause death of the RPE cells.
Our present study shows that oxidative stress also caused increases in the expression levels of FasL and Fas in RPE cells themselves, and pretreatment of RPE cells with antioxidants GSH and NAC can inhibit oxidant-induced FasL and Fas expression and prevent apoptosis. Therefore, oxidative stress, in addition to its possible role in elevating FasL expression in T cells or macrophages or serum sFasL level, also directly upregulates FasL and Fas expression in RPE cells and triggers autocrine and paracrine death of RPE cells. Because we did not perform the measurement of sFasL in the culture medium of tBH-treated cells, we do not know whether RPE-derived sFasL is involved in oxidant-induced apoptosis in our system. However, the inhibition of sFasL-induced apoptosis in RPE cells by antioxidants (S. Jiang, M-W. H. Wu, P. Sternberg, and D. P. Jones, unpublished data, October 1998) indicates that oxidants have an additional rolethat is, they act as an activator of the Fas-mediated signaling pathway.
The roles of FasL and Fas in RPE cells may not be restricted to causing death of RPE cells. A recent study by Jorgensen et al.44 has shown that hRPE cells can induce apoptosis in several T cell lines and human peripheral T cells through FasL and Fas interaction. It suggests the FasL expressed in RPE cells may have an important role in maintaining immune privilege of the posterior of the eye. In healthy eyes, when the resting T cells that do not express FasL or activated T cells that express low FasL infiltrate the subretinal space, the overall interaction of FasL and Fas between T cells and RPE cells may activate a signal that travels from the FasL of RPE cells to the Fas of T cells and cause the death of the T cells. This is quite possible, because T cells are much more sensitive than RPE cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis. Therefore, although the FasL expressed in RPE is insufficient to cause suicide or fratricide, it is sufficient to trigger apoptosis in infiltrating T cells and thus to ensure immune privilege of the eye. However, in inflamed eyes, the T cells that infiltrate to the subretinal space are activated and have very high FasL expression. Under this situation, the communication between T cells and RPE may then trigger a death signal that travels from the FasL of T cells to the Fas of RPE cells, before a counterattack signal from RPE cells to T cells can be activated.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that Fas mediates apoptosis in RPE cells and that this mechanism may contribute to oxidant-induced apoptosis. Oxidants can induce expression of FasL and Fas in RPE cells, and antioxidant thiols can block this increased expression and associated apoptosis in RPE. Although incomplete inhibition by a blocking antibody indicates that other triggering mechanism(s) also occur, the data suggest that Fas-mediated apoptosis may be relevant to the death of RPE cells such as occurs in the pathogenesis of ARMD.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication June 23, 1999; revised October 13, 1999; accepted October 26, 1999.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
Corresponding author: Paul Sternberg, Jr., Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, 1365B Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322. ophtps{at}emory.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Sharma, A. Neekhra, A. L. Gramajo, J. Patil, M. Chwa, B. D. Kuppermann, and M. C. Kenney Effects of Benzo(e)Pyrene, a Toxic Component of Cigarette Smoke, on Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells In Vitro Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 5111 - 5117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Jones Radical-free biology of oxidative stress Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): C849 - C868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jiang, S. E. Moriarty-Craige, C. Li, M. J. Lynn, J. Cai, D. P. Jones, and P. Sternberg Associations of Plasma-Soluble Fas Ligand with Aging and Age-Related Macular Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 1345 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Chen, P. Sternberg, and J. Cai Characterization of a Bcl-XL-Interacting Protein FKBP8 and Its Splice Variant in Human RPE Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 1721 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Neekhra, S. Luthra, M. Chwa, G. Seigel, A. L. Gramajo, B. D. Kuppermann, and M. C. Kenney Caspase-8, -12, and -3 Activation by 7-Ketocholesterol in Retinal Neurosensory Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 1362 - 1367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Gregerson, K. L. Lew, S. W. McPherson, N. D. Heuss, and D. A. Ferrington RPE Cells Resist Bystander Killing by CTLs, but Are Highly Susceptible to Antigen-Dependent CTL Killing Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5385 - 5394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Luthra, B. Fardin, J. Dong, D. Hertzog, S. Kamjoo, S. Gebremariam, V. Butani, R. Narayanan, J. K. Mungcal, B. D. Kuppermann, et al. Activation of Caspase-8 and Caspase-12 Pathways by 7-Ketocholesterol in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5569 - 5575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-N. Ha, Y. Chen, J. Cai, and P. Sternberg Jr Increased Glutathione Synthesis through an ARE-Nrf2-Dependent Pathway by Zinc in the RPE: Implication for Protection against Oxidative Stress. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2709 - 2715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Lincoln, M. Boling, A. N. Parikh, Y. Yeh, D. G. Gilchrist, and L. S. Morse Fas Signaling Induces Raft Coalescence That Is Blocked by Cholesterol Depletion in Human RPE Cells Undergoing Apoptosis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 2172 - 2178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jiang, S. E. Moriarty-Craige, M. Orr, J. Cai, P. Sternberg Jr, and D. P. Jones Oxidant-Induced Apoptosis in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells: Dependence on Extracellular Redox State Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 1054 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Dunaief, T. Dentchev, G.-S. Ying, and A. H. Milam The Role of Apoptosis in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2002; 120(11): 1435 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jiang, S. E. Moriarty, H. Grossniklaus, K. C. Nelson, D. P. Jones, and P. Sternberg Jr Increased Oxidant-Induced Apoptosis in Cultured Nondividing Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2002; 43(8): 2546 - 2553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Strunnikova, J. Baffi, A. Gonzalez, W. Silk, S. W. Cousins, and K. G. Csaky Regulated Heat Shock Protein 27 Expression in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelium Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2001; 42(9): 2130 - 2138. |