|
|
||||||||
-Subunit of Phosphodiesterase
From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunit of rod PDE6
(Pdegtm1/+). METHODS. Wild-type mice and Pdegtm1/+ mice were subjected to electroretinography (ERG) 1 hour after exposure to one of three treatments: 1) no drug, 2) an intraperitoneal injection of sildenafil at 2 times the equivalent maximal daily recommended dosage for humans, or 3) 10 times this dosage. Control ERGs were also obtained to evaluate the reversibility of changes in retinal function after sildenafil treatment. A minimum of 48 hours elapsed between electroretinogram (ERG) recordings for drug washout and animal recovery.
RESULTS. ERGs of the Pdegtm1/+ mice treated with sildenafil showed a reversible, dose-dependent decrease in a- and b-wave amplitudes. Wild-type mice treated with sildenafil did not show significant differences in either a- or b-wave amplitudes compared with untreated control animals.
CONCLUSIONS. These findings suggest that sildenafil has a significant impact on retinal function in Pdegtm1/+ mice and may have implications in human carriers of RP. In addition, extension of these results in other model systems could be useful in understanding the mechanisms of RP and other forms of retinal degeneration.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sildenafil (Viagra; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY) is a PDE5 inhibitor in wide use for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.8 9 It is known to increase the level of cGMP, and ultimately increases penile response to sexual stimulation.11 Sildenafil preferentially inhibits PDE5 more than PDE6, with a relative mean inhibitory concentration of 1:10.10 The potential therefore exists for this drug to alter retinal function, not only in normal subjects, but also in patients with PDE6 gene mutations such as in some forms of RP.
Visual side effects of sildenafil in humans have been reported to include the temporary occurrence of blue-tinged or hazy vision and an increased sensitivity to light.12 13 14 15 16 These phenomena increase with dosage, with the incidence approaching 50% if recommended dosages are exceeded.17 Studies evaluating retinal function in humans by electroretinography have noted small transient changes to the electroretinogram (ERG).18 19 20 21 22 Such investigations have focused on normal subjects rather than those with underlying retinal diseases. Little information is therefore available on the potential side effects of sildenafil in patients with frank RP or in carriers.
The PDE enzyme consists of an
, a ß, and two
subunits. The
first two subunits are catalytic, whereas the latter perform an
inhibitory function.
Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1
gene knockout mice have been well-characterized
recently.23
24
25
26
These homozygotes do not possess the
-subunit of PDE6, resulting in low enzyme activity, leading to
elevated levels of cGMP in the retina. High cGMP concentrations are
thought to be the initiating factor that triggers the degeneration of
the photoreceptor cells. The
Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1
homozygotes have been shown to have retinal degeneration analogous to
RP in humans with known PDE mutations. Conversely, heterozygous
(Pdegtm1/+) mice have been shown to have normal
retinal electrophysiology and histology, similar to most autosomal
recessive human RP carriers. This animal model makes it possible to
test the effects of various pharmacologic agents on the retina in vivo,
with potential application to the understanding and treatment of human
RP. The goal of this study was to quantify the effects of sildenafil on
retinal function in heterozygous Pdegtm1/+ mice
using electroretinography.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sildenafil
Using sterile technique, 100-mg tablets of sildenafil were
pulverized and then solubilized with 0.9% NaCl. The subsequent
solution was then filtered with a Sterivex-GS 0.22-µm filter unit
(Millipore, Bedford, MA) and stored in a sterile container at 4°C.
The sildenafil (3.5 mg/ml) solution was warmed to room temperature
before treatment.
Electroretinography
Three groups of mice were tested. Each mouse in group I (+/+
wild-type) underwent ERG recordings in the following order at three
time points: 1) before sildenafil treatment (n = 11), 2) 1
hour after an intraperitoneal injection of sildenafil at 2 times (2x;
2.9 mg/kg) the equivalent maximum dose by weight recommended for a
70-kg human (n = 11), and 3) 1 hour after an intraperitoneal
injection of sildenafil at 10 times (10x; 14.3 mg/kg) the equivalent
maximum dose by weight recommended for a 70-kg human (n =
7).
Each mouse in group II (Pdegtm1/+ heterozygotes) underwent ERG recordings at three time points: 1) before sildenafil treatment (n = 12), 2) 1 hour after an intraperitoneal injection of sildenafil at the 2x dose (n = 11), and 3) 1 hour after an intraperitoneal injection of sildenafil at the 10x dose (n = 12). Group II, Pdegtm1/+ heterozygous mice (n = 7) were also retested without sildenafil treatment, after the 10x treatment to evaluate the potential reversibility of the effect of sildenafil treatment on the ERGs.
The initial recordings obtained from groups I and II were between P28 and P36. A minimum of 48-hours was maintained between all successive ERG recordings to ensure drug washout and to allow animal recovery.
Each mouse in group III (Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1 homozygotes) underwent ERG recordings at a single time point (P49) without sildenafil treatment (n = 5) as a control to verify the retinal degeneration previously reported at P56.23
All ERG recordings were performed by the same investigator (DB), according to a similar method previously reported.27 Before each recording session, all mice were dark adapted for a minimum of 12 hours. Under dim illumination, mice receiving treatment were given an intraperitoneal injection of 2x and of 10x sildenafil 1 hour before ERG recordings. Just before recording, all mice were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of a ketamine (150 mg/kg) and xylazine (7.5 mg/kg) mixture. The pupils were dilated (1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride), and a DTL electrode (X-Static silver-coated conductive nylon yarn; Sauquoit, Scranton, PA) was placed on the corneal surface, which was kept moist with 0.5% methylcellulose. A reference electrode was placed in the mouth (E5 disc electrode; Grass, Quincy, MA), and a ground electrode (E2 subdermal electrode; Grass) was positioned in the tail, after topical anesthetic (1% lidocaine jelly) application to minimize any discomfort. Mice were positioned in front of a Ganzfeld dome on a warmed stage to minimize body heat loss. Scotopic intensity response functions were generated with flashes of white light emitted by a visual electrodiagnostic system (model UTAS E-2000; LKC, Gaithersburg, MD) 20 µsec in duration, starting with a -4.3 log [candelas]cd/m-2 per second stimulus and progressing to the brightest flash at 0.5 log cd/m-2 per second in 0.8-log-unit steps. Each response represented an average of two to five flashes, depending on the intensity of the stimulus. To avoid the conditioning effect previously reported to alter dark-adapted ERGs, a minimum interstimulus interval of 15 seconds was maintained.28 29 All responses were amplified, filtered (low [0.5 Hz] and high [1500 Hz] cutoff), and averaged (LKC software). For ERG waveform analysis, the a-wave was measured from baseline to the first negative trough of the ERG response, and the b-wave amplitude was measured from the a-wave trough to the most positive peak of the response. At flash intensities that failed to evoke an a-wave, the b-wave was measured from baseline to the most positive peak. All implicit times were measure from flash onset to the corresponding a- and b-wave amplitudes. Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Reversibility
The reversibility of the acute effects of sildenafil was
determined by retesting Pdegtm1/+ mice that had
previously received 2x and 10x sildenafil treatment but had been
given at least a 48-hour period for recovery and drug washout. No
significant differences in scotopic amplitudes or implicit times were
observed at either the dimmest (-1.9 log
cd/m-2 per second) or
brightest (0.5 log cd/m-2
per second) stimulus intensities between the retested eyes and the
responses previously obtained from the untreated
Pdegtm1/+ control animals (P >
0.05; Fig. 2D
).
Sildenafil Effects on Retinal Function in Wild-Type (+/+) Mice
We measured ERGs in wild-type (+/+) mice 1 hour after
intraperitoneal injections of 2x and 10x sildenafil (Figs. 1A
1C)
.
Neither treatment (Figs. 3B
3C)
produced
differences in a- and b-wave amplitudes (P > 0.05)
compared with untreated control animals. At the two brightest stimuli,
however, the b-wave amplitudes displayed a trend toward higher
amplitudes with increasing sildenafil dosage. The a- and b-wave
implicit times of 2x- and 10x-treated wild-type (+/+) mice showed no
differences (P > 0.05) when compared with those in
untreated control animals.
|
subunit of
PDE6.30
We were unable to detect any appreciable ERG
responses, even at the brightest stimulus intensity (Fig. 3D)
. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit gene mutation (Pdegtm1/+) with as
little as 2x the maximum equivalent dose recommended for humans.
Further decreases to both a- and b-wave amplitudes, with concurrent
delays in implicit times, were observed in
Pdegtm1/+ mice treated with 10x sildenafil.
This dose-dependent decrease was not observed in wild-type (+/+)
control animals. We were surprised to note that wild-type (+/+) mice had a subtle dose-dependent augmentation of ERG amplitudes at brighter stimuli with sildenafil treatment. These results are in contrast to the known action of sildenafil as an inhibitor of PDE6. A similar effect was reported in wild-type dogs receiving increasing doses of sildenafil.31 32 However, a moderate decline in the ERG was noted in these animals when the dosage reached 10x the maximum equivalent dose recommended for humans, a result not observed in the present study. Studies of nonspecific PDE inhibitors in cats demonstrated that lower doses slightly increase the amplitude of the rod b-wave, whereas diminished amplitudes were observed at higher doses.33 Because a given concentration of sildenafil inhibits PDE6 10 times less than PDE5,10 the 2x- and 10x-treated wild-type (+/+) mice may have responded in a relatively low-dose fashion, exhibiting the ERG enhancement seen at lower doses of nonspecific PDE inhibitors. This low-dose response may also be responsible for the temporary side effects, such as increased sensitivity to light, that have been noted in patients taking sildenafil.12
The heterozygous PDE6
-subunit knockout mutation probably leads to a
decrease in functional PDE6, creating enhanced susceptibility to the
inhibitory effects of sildenafil. Higher levels of cGMP resulting from
this effect may clamp the membrane potential at a depolarized voltage
resulting in a partial blockage of the phototransduction cascade.
Increasing the dosages of sildenafil would be expected to produce
further reductions in PDE6 activity and retinal function, as we
observed. Accordingly, heterozygous Pdegtm1/+
mice receiving 2x and 10x sildenafil had diminished retinal function;
whereas similarly treated wild-type (+/+) mice did not. Although other
investigators have studied the effects of phototransduction cascade
inhibitors, so far as we are aware, we are the first to report that a
specific inhibitor of PDE decreases retinal function in a model of
retinal degeneration.
Although our study focused on the inhibitory effects of sildenafil, we also evaluated short-term reversibility of these effects on retinal function in heterozygous Pdegtm1/+ mice. A minimum 48-hour (36120 half-lives) washout and recovery period was used before testing for reversibility,30 and it is therefore unlikely that any drug remained at the time of retesting. Sildenafils impact on retinal function in Pdegtm1/+ mice appeared to be temporary, although there are no long-term data. One-year ocular toxicity studies involving wild-type dogs receiving high doses of sildenafil have reported similar results,31 but toxicity studies have not been performed on animals that are carriers of retinal degenerations. Repeated exposure to sildenafil in carriers may result in chronically elevated levels of cGMP, placing them at an increased risk for retinal toxicity. Long-term studies would be helpful to investigate this concern further.
We found no appreciable rod function in untreated
Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1
knockout mice at 7 weeks after birth. It has been reported previously
that these homozygous
Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1
mice have reduced PDE6 activity, reduced electrophysiologic responses,
and histologic evidence of retinal degeneration analogous to that found
in RP.24
Diminished levels of PDE6 are known to increase
cGMP in
Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1
mice, and high cGMP levels are in turn known to be toxic to the
retina,34
35
36
explaining both the electrophysiologic and
histologic findings.23
Our observations of extinguished
ERGs in the homozygous
Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1
mice are in keeping with this mechanism. Given that the PDE
-subunit
deletion of the
Pdegtm1/Pdegtm1
mouse effectively reproduces the same retinal degeneration observed in
the PDE ß-subunit mutant rd/rd, presumably the
implications for heterozygous Pdegtm1/+
ß-subunit carriers would be similar to the
carriers previously
described in the rd1 mouse.23
At least 1 in 50 people worldwide is a carrier of RP.37 Most carriers have normal visual function and ERGs,38 but their risk for potential retinal toxicity from PDE inhibitors is presently unknown. Recent human studies found no evidence of ocular toxicity, aside from transient visual disturbances in patients taking sildenafil.15 16 22 39 40 However, these studies have either excluded subjects with known visual problems, or have been unlikely to include a sufficient number of RP carriers to study this important subpopulation. Thus, the transient and potential long-term effect of sildenafil on visual function may not be fully appreciated at this time.
Although our understanding of RP has progressed rapidly, only one half
of known genes responsible for this disease have been
characterized41
(summarized on Retnet at
http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/home.htm; provided by the
University of HoustonTexas Health Science Center). PDE
-
and ß-subunit mutations have been characterized in individuals with
RP2
3
4
5
6
; however,
-subunit mutations have not yet been
identified in humans.42
Whether people heterozygous or
homozygous for
- and ß-subunit mutations are susceptible to
changes in retinal function from sildenafil in a fashion analogous to
the Pdegtm1/+ heterozygous mice remains to be
seen. Moreover, because PDE6 mutations comprise a modest 3%
to 4.5% of cases of autosomal recessive RP in humans,5
an
important issue is to determine whether mutations in other genes
leading to retinal degenerations lead to the same potential
susceptibility. We look forward to extension of our results in other
model systems to further elucidate the physiologic risks to people
heterozygous for RP.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Commercial relationships policy: N.
Corresponding author: Michael J. Potter, Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, 2550 Willow Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 3N9. mpotter{at}interchange.ubc.ca
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit of rod cGMP phosphodiesterase Nat Genet 11,468-471[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40,1859-1865
subunit of rod cGMP phosphodiesterase Science 272,1026-1029[Abstract]
gene desensitizing and delaying murine rod photoreceptors Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40,3262-3267This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Baquero, A. Soliz, F. Neira, M. E. Venegas, and A. Sola Oral Sildenafil in Infants With Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn: A Pilot Randomized Blinded Study Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1077 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hoeper, N. Galie, G. Simonneau, and L. J. Rubin New Treatments for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 2002; 165(9): 1209 - 1216. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |