|
|
||||||||
1 From the Departments of Ophthalmology and 3 Neuroscience, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine; and the 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was elevated unilaterally in Wistar rats with argon laser irradiation of the trabecular meshwork 5 days after intracameral injection of india ink. Immunohistochemical staining for Hsp72 was performed. The rats with elevated IOP were treated with heat stress once a week (six rats) or intraperitoneal injection of zinc (10 mg/kg) every two weeks (six rats). Untreated rats with elevated IOP served as a control group (six rats). Quercetin, an inhibitor of Hsp expression was injected in the rats with heat stress (six rats) and zinc injection (seven rats). Subsequent to 4 weeks of IOP elevation, RGCs were counted.
RESULTS. The IOP increase compared with the contralateral eyes was 48% ± 4% throughout the study period. Hsp72 was detected only in the eyes with elevated IOP at 1 and 2 days and was weakly detected at 1 week of IOP elevation. A single administration of zinc strongly induced Hsp72 in RGCs of rats with elevated IOP for 2 weeks. Treatment with heat stress or zinc in rats with elevated IOP increased RGC survival after 4 weeks of IOP elevation, compared with the untreated control group (P = 0.004, n = 6). Quercetin reversed the positive effect of heat stress or zinc injection on RGC survival.
CONCLUSIONS. These results demonstrate the possibility of a novel therapeutic approach to glaucoma through an enhanced induction of the endogenous heat shock response.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the various families of Hsps classified according to molecular weight, the Hsp70 family, which is expressed during preconditioning stress, is known to be essential for neuroprotective effects.4 5 6 7 Recently, neurons of transgenic mice overexpressing Hsp728 or those of rats injected with the herpes virus containing Hsp72 genes9 have been shown to be more resistant to ischemia and seizures. A neuroprotective role of Hsp72 against ischemic and excitotoxic cell death in cultured retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) has been demonstrated.10
Zinc, an essential cofactor for many enzymes, robustly induces Hsp72 in HeLa cells11 and rat astrocytes12 in vitro and in lung, liver, and kidney cells of the rat13 and the pig14 in vivo. However, there is no published evidence that zinc induces Hsp72 in neurons, especially in RGCs. Zinc is neuroprotective when subcutaneously injected twice at 24 and 48 hours before transient global ischemia in the gerbil.15
Glaucoma, one of the worlds leading causes of blindness, is characterized by progressive optic nerve damage with selective loss of RGCs.16 17 18 Although we still do not know the exact mechanism of injury of RGC damage in glaucoma, there is a strong possibility that any stressful insult to RGCs in glaucoma induces Hsp72 and that this stress protein is related to an endogenous neuroprotective mechanism. We investigated whether Hsp72 is induced in RGCs in an experimental rat glaucoma model with chronic intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation, whether systemically administered zinc induces Hsp72 in rat RGCs, and whether the induction of Hsp72 by heat stress or zinc enhances RGC survival in this model.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The second stage of experiments was performed to investigate whether zinc or heat stress induces Hsp72 in rat RGCs. The divalent cation zinc (Zn2+, 10 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally into four normal rats and four with elevated IOP in the form of zinc sulfate (24.6 mg/kg). Two control rats were injected intraperitoneally with saline. Immunohistochemical staining for Hsp72 was performed simultaneously with staining for Thy-1 at 1 and 2 days and at 1 and 2 weeks after injection, as described later. Thy-1 reacts specifically with RGCs.19
For Western blot analysis of Hsp72 in RGCs, two rats were injected intraperitoneally with zinc sulfate and two were treated with heat stress. An additional two rats were injected intraperitoneally with 400 mg/kg of quercetin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), an inhibitor of Hsp expression20 21 22 followed by heat stress 6 hours later, and two normal rats served as a control. RGCs were isolated from four retinas in each subgroup and Western blot analysis was performed with the methods described later.
The third stage of experiments was performed to investigate whether the induction of Hsp72 by heat stress or zinc would increase the survival of RGCs in the rat glaucoma model. Thirty-one rats were divided into five groups (six rats each of groups IIV; seven rats in group V). Intraocular pressure was elevated in all five groups over a span of 4 weeks, as will be described. Group I served as a control group with elevated IOP but without any treatment. The rats in group II were treated with heat stress every week, as described later. The rats in group III were intraperitoneally injected with zinc sulfate every 2 weeks. The rats in group IV were intraperitoneally injected with 400 mg/kg of quercetin 6 hours before heat stress every week, as will be described. The rats in group V were intraperitoneally injected with quercetin 6 hours before injection of zinc sulfate every 2 weeks. At 4 weeks of IOP elevation and treatment, RGCs were counted from wholemounted retinas, prepared 24 hours after retrograde labeling by dextran tetramethylrhodamine (DTMR) applied to the retrobulbar optic nerve, as described later.
Rat Glaucoma Model
Male Wistar rats, weighing 250 to 300 g, were used for all
three stages of the experiments. They were housed in a standard animal
room lit with fluorescent lights (330 lux), which were automatically
turned on at 6 AM and off at 6 PM. Room temperature was maintained at
21°C. All experiments complied with the ARVO Statement for the Use of
Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.
Rats were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of 0.8 ml/kg of a cocktail solution of 5 ml ketamine (100 mg/ml), 2.5 ml xylazine (20 mg/ml), 1.0 ml acepromazine (10 mg/ml), and 1.5 ml normal saline. The right eye of each animal was injected intracamerally with 10 µl of 35% india ink (Becton Dickinson Co., Cockeysville, MD) diluted in BSS (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), after the same amount of aqueous was drained. After injection of india ink, carbon particles aggregated in the trabecular meshwork and formed a black pigmented band along the limbus. Five days after india ink injection, ab externo argon laser photocoagulation to the pigmented trabecular meshwork was performed.23 Seventy to 90 laser burns were delivered around the pigmented trabecular band at laser settings of 200 µm, 260 to 300 mW, and 0.2 seconds.
IOP Measurements
IOP was measured between 10 AM and 2 PM with a tonometer
(Tono-Pen XL; Mentor O&O, Norwell, MA) 5 minutes after intramuscular
injection of 0.6 ml/kg of cocktail solution (stage 1 experiment) or 8
mg/kg of acepromazine (stage 3 experiment), and 30 seconds after
topical instillation of 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride. Five readings
with firm contact of the tonometer tip with the cornea were recorded in
each eye. Any readings that occurred just before the tip contacted the
cornea (contact with the tear film meniscus) or just after the tip was
removed from the cornea were ignored because of their
unreliability.24
The average of these readings was
recorded as the IOP for that measurement.
In two rats in each group in the third stage of experiments, dark-phase IOP measurements were performed 2 hours after the room lights were turned off. Dark-phase measurements were made with a long-wavelength 16-W bulb (Bright Laboratory Jr. CPM, Inc., Dallas, TX) that emits the far-red range of the visible light spectrum and does not affect circadian rhythms.25 26
Hyperthermia (Heat Stress)
All rats in group II and IV of the third stage of experiments,
four rats from the second stage, and one rat from the first stage (see
general scheme described earlier) were treated with heat stress as
follows: Each rat was anesthetized with an intramuscular injection (8
ml/kg) of the same cocktail solution described in the creation of the
rat glaucoma model. Five minutes after being anesthestized, each rat
was placed in an 18 x 8 x 7-cm hollow, unlidded, buoyant,
aluminum receptacle. Rat and receptacle were then immediately placed in
a water bath at a constant temperature of 42°C. Increasing body
temperatures were continuously monitored with a rectal thermometer
until rectal temperatures were kept between 40°C and 42°C for 15
minutes. Usually, it took 25 to 30 minutes for rats to achieve a rectal
temperature of 40°C. The rats were then removed from the water bath
and allowed to recover from the anesthesia. A similar treatment had
been shown previously to robustly induce Hsp72 in the
retina.3
Evaluation of RGC Density
For analyses of RGC density, four rats were killed at 8 weeks of
IOP elevation, 24 hours after retrograde labeling. Retrograde labeling
was performed with the animals under anesthesia with 0.8 ml/kg of the
cocktail solution. The right optic nerve was exposed through a lateral
conjunctival incision in four rats. The optic nerve sheath was incised
with a needle knife 2 mm longitudinally at least 3 mm behind the eye. A
cross section of the optic nerve was made with the needle knife through
the opening of the optic nerve sheath. DTMR (3000 molecular weight,
anionic, lysine fixable; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) crystals were
applied to the proximal cut surface of the optic nerve to label RGCs by
fast axonal diffusion.27
28
The same procedure was
performed for the right optic nerve of six normal rats that served as a
control group. The rats were perfused first with saline and then with
4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the eyes
were then enucleated. The retinas were dissected, flattened with four
radial cuts (the deepest in the superior pole and the others in the
inferior, temporal, and nasal poles), fixed for an additional 30
minutes, and mounted with the vitreal side up on glass slides. The
retinas were examined with a fluorescence microscope (Axioplan; Carl
Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an ultraviolet filter that
permits visualization of rhodamine fluorescence (excitation filter BP
546, barrier filter LP590; Carl Zeiss).
Labeled RGCs were counted from printed fluorescent micrographs of 12 standard areas of each retina. Each rectangular area measured 0.34 x 0.22 mm2, and there were three areas in each retinal quadrant (superotemporal, inferotemporal, superonasal, and inferonasal) at 1, 2, and 3 mm, respectively, from the optic disc. The number of labeled cells in the 12 photographs was divided by the area of the region and pooled to calculate mean densities of labeled neurons per square millimeter for each retina. RGC counts were conducted by two investigators in a masked fashion and averaged. The identity of the retinas that led to the micrographs was unknown to the counters until cell counts from different groups were completed.
Immunohistochemistry
At 1 and 2 days and at 1, 2, 3, and 8 weeks after IOP elevation,
the rats were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS after deep
anesthesia with the cocktail solution. The eyes were dissected and then
immersed in the same fixative for 1 hour. The cornea and lens were
removed and immersed in the same fixative overnight. The eyes were
embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 7 µm thickness along the
vertical meridian through the optic nerve head. After deparaffinization
and rehydration, the tissue sections were incubated with blocking
solution containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2% horse serum, and
0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 hour. This was followed by incubation
with mouse monoclonal antibodies to Hsc70 (constitutive form, StressGen
Biotechnologies Corp., Victoria, British Columbia, Canada) 1:100 or
Hsp72 (inducible form, StressGen Biotechnologies) 1:100 for 1 hour and
horse anti-mouse IgG conjugated with biotin 1:100 for 1 hour at room
temperature. Antigenantibody complexes were detected by an
avidin-biotin-peroxidase technique (Vectastain ABC Kit, Vector
Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA). As a substrate to the peroxidase,
diaminobenzidine (DAB) was used to produce a brown color in the target
tissue. The stained tissues were examined with a light microscope. For
a negative control of the immunohistochemical staining, the sections
were incubated with blocking solution without primary antibody. Retinal
tissue enucleated 24 hours after heat stress was used as a positive
control.
After deep anesthesia with the cocktail solution, all rats from stage 2 were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Eyes were dissected and then immersed in the same fixative for 1 hour. The cornea and lens were then removed and the rest of the eye immersed in 30% sucrose until it sank to the bottom of the sucrose solution. The eyes were then frozen in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) media (Tissue-Tek; Sakura Finetechnical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and sectioned at a 14-µm thickness along the vertical meridian, through the optic nerve head. Tissue sections were then incubated with blocking solution containing 10% FCS, 2% donkey serum, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 hour. This was followed by incubation with mouse monoclonal antibodies to Hsp72 (StressGen Biotechnologies) 1:50 and goat polyclonal antibody to Thy-1 (Research Diagnostics, Inc., Flanders, NJ) 1:400 for 1 hour and donkey anti-mouse IgG conjugated with FITC (Research Diagnostics, Inc.) 1:100 for 1 hour at room temperature and donkey anti-goat IgG conjugated with rhodamine Red-X (Research Diagnostics, Inc.) 1:400 for 1 hour at room temperature. This double immunofluorescent staining was also performed in stage I experiments to confirm that the cells expressing Hsp72 are RGCs. The immunofluorescence from all staining was observed with a fluorescence microscope.
Isolation of RGCs
RGCs were partially purified from other cells in the rat retinas
by a modification of a method previously described.29
30
Retinas were isolated from normal rats and 24 hours after
intraperitoneal zinc injection, heat stress, or quercetin injection
plus heat stress. Four rat retinas from each subgroup were washed in 5
ml of calcium- and magnesium-free PBS, and incubated in 2.5 ml of PBS
containing 0.5 mg/ml trypsin and 0.01% DNase for 15 minutes at 37°C.
This was followed by washing of the retinas twice in 5 ml of minimal
essential medium (MEM) containing 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum
twice. The retinas were subsequently washed in 5 ml of MEM twice and
dissociated in 3 ml of MEM. The cell suspension was then mixed with 1.5
ml of 30% metrizamide (ICN Biomedicals, Inc., Aurora, OH) in MEM to
give a final concentration of 10% metrizamide. This mixture was then
overlaid with 5% metrizamide in MEM, and the gradient was centrifuged
at 4500 rpm in a rotor (HB-4; Sorvall Instruments, Newtown, CT) for 25
minutes at 4°C. The cells in the 5% to 10% interface were collected
and washed in 10 ml of cold MEM. The washed cells were pelleted by
centrifugation at 400g for 5 minutes. The cells were then
resuspended in 100 to 150 µl of MEM buffer, and the protein
concentration in the cell suspension was measured with the
bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Immunoblot
Western blot analysis of proteins on membranes (Immobilon-P;
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., Piscataway, NJ) was performed
according to the procedure of Towbin et al.31
The membrane
was blocked by incubation in 0.1% Tween-20 in 100 mM Tris-buffered
saline containing 1% nonfat dried milk for 1 hour. The membrane was
then incubated with primary monoclonal anti-72-kDa Hsp (Hsp72;
StressGen Biotechnologies Corp.) at a final dilution of 1:500 for 1
hour, and biotinylated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.) at a final dilution of 1:500 for 1 hour. This
was followed by incubation with streptavidin-conjugated horseradish
peroxidase (1:1000 dilution; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.) for 40
minutes. The immunoreactive bands were detected by chemiluminescence
with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blot reagent
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although many papers have been published about the neuroprotective role of Hsp72, the exact mechanism of neuroprotection by this stress protein remains unknown. It may be explained by the chaperoning function of Hsp72 on proteins that are important for the survival of cells. Hsps participate in the folding and assembly of nascent and unfolded peptides, and they facilitate protein transport to specific subcellular compartments and disposal by degradation.35 36 Hsps are also involved in multiple stages of the apoptosis pathway and function to inhibit apoptosis.37 38 Hsp70 overexpression protects mitochondria from the deleterious effect of reactive oxygen species (ROS).39 Hsp70 inhibits apoptosis downstream of cytochrome c release and upstream of caspase-3 activation.40 Inhibition of stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) by Hsp70 has been reported.41
Zinc is an essential element for normal growth and function in humans.42 43 It is present in highest concentration in the retina and choroid in the body42 and functions as an essential cofactor for more than 100 enzymes in the body. Ultrastructural studies have suggested that brain zinc is present within the synaptic vesicles of glutaminergic neurons.44 In the present study systemically administered zinc induced Hsp72 in RGCs of both normal and glaucomatous rat eyes. Although we do not know yet the exact mechanism of zinc in the induction of Hsp72, it has been proposed that the translocation of synaptic zinc to postsynaptic neuron induces Hsp72 induction in the rat hippocampus.45 Because excessive extracellular zinc and excessive influx of zinc into postsynaptic neurons may contribute to neuronal death46 after transient global ischemia or sustained seizures,47 48 systemic zinc administration in this experiment may have presented a preconditioning stress to RGCs and thus may have induced Hsp72.
Zinc is quite nontoxic compared with other transition metals.47 The dosage (10 mg/kg of zinc twice a week) in this experiment did not show any observable systemic side effects during the 4 weeks of the study period. It has been reported that rats receiving 16 mg/kg zinc orally every day for 32 weeks showed no striking pathologic alterations.13 In a human clinical study, zinc has been tried in macular degeneration with an oral dosage of 200 mg of zinc sulfate daily for 2 years49 with no significant adverse effects. Thus, any nontoxic pharmacologic agent that can increase Hsp72 in RGCs may have a beneficial effect in neuroprotection in a rat glaucoma model. Geranylgeranylacetone, an antiulcer drug developed in Japan, may be another candidate for a safe inducer of Hsp72.50 The drug protects gastric mucosal cells under conditions of stress through Hsp72 expression.
Although there was no statistically significant difference in the total density of labeled cells between the heat stressed and the zinc-treated group in this study, there was a trend in the zinc-treated group toward a higher density of labeled cells than in the heat stressed group. Further, the density of labeled cells in group V after inhibition of Hsp expression by quercetin in zinc-treated rats was significantly higher than in control group I (Table 1) . These findings may be explained as follows: First, the peak expression of Hsp72 is known to be at 18 hours after heat stress,51 whereas the effect of zinc lasts longer by at least 2 weeks, as shown in this study. The second explanation is that zinc itself may have a neuroprotective effect in addition to Hsp induction. It has been reported that zinc blocks the action of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) on cortical neurons.52
In stage 1 experiments, IOP was measured after cocktail anesthesia (ketamine, xylazine, and acepromazine), whereas in stage 3 experiments IOP was measured after acepromazine injection only. That explains why the baseline and postlaser IOPs in stage 1 were lower than those in stage 3. It has been reported that with increasing duration of anesthesia, the measured IOP continues to decrease in a nonlinear fashion after cocktail anesthesia.53 This effect seems to be due to a muscle-relaxation effect of xylazine combined with suppressed sympathetic neuronal function and decreased aqueous production.54 When acepromazine only was used as in stage 3 experiments, the rats maintained normal muscle tone but were calm enough for the measurement of IOP. The level of baseline IOPs measured with acepromazine only is equivalent to that in a previous study in which IOP was measured without general anesthesia.25
In this study we used the method of labeling from the retrobulbar optic nerve instead of labeling from the superior colliculus. Although we did not directly compare our method with the labeling method from the superior colliculus, the normal density of labeled cells measured from our method correlates well with previous studies using the superior colliculus.55 56 The advantage of retrobulbar labeling is that the method is simple and results can be acquired quickly24 hours after labeling. Thus, there is less concern about a decrease in the intensity of the dye or fluorescent material due to metabolism or loss of fluorescence. Although the optic nerve is transected, the transection itself does not affect the results, because RGC death begins 5 days or more after the axotomy.57 There may be concern about the possibility that elevated IOP affects the active transport of dye to the RGCs. However, because 3000-molecular weight DTMR is transported by fast axonal diffusion rather than active transport,28 the possibility of the blockade of axonal diffusion in response to elevated IOP is very low. Even though anything is possible, the RGC count was compared among the eyes with IOP elevation in the stage 3 experiment, and the IOP conditions were therefore the same for all groups and the statistical analysis was performed among those five groups (Table 1) .
It cannot be ruled out that Hsp72 may partially restore the axonal transport yielding an artificially greater number of cells that are labeled. Thus, it may require additional conventional staining of wholemounts or regular histology to confirm the result of retrograde labeling. However, we should not miss the point that when the staining of wholemounts or regular histology is used, rather than retrograde labeling, displaced amacrine cells are another problem that may introduce an artifact.
To rule out any possibility that the laser treatment itself may be responsible for the expression of Hsp72, we previously had performed the laser treatment on the peripheral cornea anterior to the trabecular meshwork, not to elevate IOP (unpublished data). Those eyes did not show any Hsp72-positive staining in RGCs, which suggests the laser treatment itself at the peripheral cornea does not affect the expression of Hsp72 in RGCs.
In glaucoma treatment, patients often experience progression of disease, even after maximum reduction of IOP. Also, in patients with normal-tension glaucoma, we cannot entirely depend on IOP reduction, because substantial further reduction of IOP is often difficult. Because we know that the final common pathway of glaucoma is RGC death, an approach to protect RGCs by inducing an Hsp responsean endogenous neuroprotection strategycan widen the field of glaucoma treatment. Recently, Hsp 60 and Hsp 27 immunoreactivities have been shown to be increased in human glaucomatous eyes compared with normal eyes, which may reflect a role of Hsps as a cellular defense mechanism in response to stress or injury in glaucoma.58 In this study, we identified a possible role for at least one Hsp, Hsp72, in RGC survival in eyes with elevated IOP. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel therapeutic approach to glaucoma through an enhanced Hsp response. However, further study with other models of optic nerve damage and functional evaluations of RGCs should be conducted to confirm the neuroprotective effect of stress proteins. Also we should consider the possibility that other Hsps, not investigated in this study, may have some role in RGC survival.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Glaucoma Research Foundation, San Francisco, California.
Submitted for publication November 2, 2000; revised January 25, 2001; accepted February 7, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Joseph Caprioli, Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Room 2-118, 100 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7000. caprioli{at}jsei.ucla.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Kim, K. H. Park, Y. J. Kim, H. J. Park, and D. M. Kim Thermal Injury Induces Heat Shock Protein in the Optic Nerve Head In Vivo Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4888 - 4894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tezel, X. Yang, and J. Cai Proteomic Identification of Oxidatively Modified Retinal Proteins in a Chronic Pressure-Induced Rat Model of Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3177 - 3187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ahmed, K. M. Brown, D. A. Stephan, J. C. Morrison, E. C. Johnson, and S. I. Tomarev Microarray Analysis of Changes in mRNA Levels in the Rat Retina after Experimental Elevation of Intraocular Pressure Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1247 - 1258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ishii, J. M. K. Kwong, and J. Caprioli Retinal Ganglion Cell Protection with Geranylgeranylacetone, a Heat Shock Protein Inducer, in a Rat Glaucoma Model Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 1982 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Chauhan, J. Pan, M. L. Archibald, T. L. LeVatte, M. E. M. Kelly, and F. Tremblay Effect of Intraocular Pressure on Optic Disc Topography, Electroretinography, and Axonal Loss in a Chronic Pressure-Induced Rat Model of Optic Nerve Damage Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2002; 43(9): 2969 - 2976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||