|
|
||||||||
1 From the Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida; the 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Virchow-Charité Hospital, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; the 3 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; the 4 Department of Ophthalmology, CHU Sart-Tillman, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium; and the 5 Department of Ophthalmology, Hôtel-Dieu Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Forty-one adult New Zealand White rabbits received either a single IV injection, topical, or CCI administration of aspirin at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. Histologic evaluation was performed in four CCI-treated eyes to assess safety. Pharmacokinetic distribution in all ocular tissues and fluids was studied at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the treatments. Immediately after death, the eyes were dissected and salicylic acid (SA) concentration was determined by HPLC analysis. Blood was sampled at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours, and plasma SA levels for systemic distribution were measured by HPLC analysis.
RESULTS. No tissue damage was observed clinically or histologically. SA was found in all tissues and fluids throughout the study period of 8 hours. The highest concentrations of SA were observed with CCI immediately after treatment for all tissues and were the highest SA tissue peaks obtained by the studied delivery methods. IV administration demonstrated a delayed tissue peak of salicylate at 2 hours after administration. At 8 hours, ocular SA concentrations were in the same range for CCI and IV administration. IV injection resulted in blood plasma levels up to 28 times higher than CCI and remained significantly elevated until 8 hours after the treatments.
CONCLUSIONS. CCI is a safe and effective method of administering aspirin to the eye while avoiding the systemic side effects associated with IV injection.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although PGs are implicated in the pathophysiology of various ocular disease processes, the usage of NSAIDs is relatively limited in ophthalmology. It is possible that the restricted utility of NSAIDs in ophthalmology is due to the inability of current delivery methods to transfer drug into the appropriate ocular tissues efficiently. Pharmacokinetic studies focusing on different methods for administration of NSAIDs to the eye, such as topical, subconjunctival, or systemic application demonstrate high drug concentrations in the anterior chamber, but low or insignificant amounts in the posterior segment.19 20 21 NSAIDs are the established treatment for many clinical disorders, such as cystoid macular edema,22 allergic conjunctivitis, scleritis, and episcleritis. Topical drug administration, although the most common method of administration, results in subtherapeutic levels for the treatment of posterior segment diseases.23 24 Attempts to solve this problem have been focused on developing different administration techniques, including drug carrier systems such as nanoparticles, nanocapsules, or NSAID silicon oil emulsions.25 26
Of special interest to our laboratory was the development of a system of drug administration capable of obtaining therapeutic drug concentrations in the entire eye while avoiding systemic exposure. Therefore, we investigated topical noninvasive coulomb-controlled iontophoresis (CCI) drug delivery,27 because it offers a defined and controlled administration of NSAIDs to the anterior and posterior segments of the eye.
Iontophoresis, the transfer of charged drug molecules across tissues through an electric field, appears to be a useful means of application of NSAIDs. Numerous studies have already documented the enhanced delivery of various drugs into the anterior and posterior segments of the eye by using iontophoresis.28 Water-soluble low-molecular-weight drugs, which are in their ionized form at physiological pH, are preferable for iontophoretic administration in ophthalmic therapy.
From an electrochemical standpoint (low molecular weight [180.16] and a negative logarithm of acid ionization [pKa] of 3.5) aspirin was an ideal candidate for this pharmacokinetic study. Clinically, aspirin is of interest as a potential ocular therapeutic agent, as suggested by Kahler et al.,29 who studied acetylsalicylic acids inhibition of fibroblast growth-promoting activity of intraocular fluids in patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. They demonstrated that the growth-promoting activity of intraocular fluid in proliferative vitreoretinopathy was significantly antagonized by inhibition of cyclooxygenase with acetylsalicylic acid (ID50 = 0.9 µg/mL).
The ability of a drug delivery system to administer therapeutic ocular acetylsalicylic acid concentrations is of crucial importance to its usage as a treatment modality. Therefore, the determination of the in vivo efficacy and safety of ocular aspirin delivery by CCI in comparison with topical administration and systemic intravenous (IV) injection was the purpose of the present study.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
New Zealand White rabbits of an average weight of 3.37 ± 0.33 kg were used. Before each treatment and before death the animals were anesthetized with intramuscular injection of ketamine (14 mg/kg) and xylazine (7 mg/kg). Animals were killed with an IV injection of 390 mg pentobarbital sodium.
Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, C9H8O4; SigmaAldrich Chemie GmBH, Steinheim, Germany) at a concentration of 10 mg/mL (pH 7.3, dissolved in balanced saline solution [BSS]) was used in the transscleral CCI applicator and for IV injection (15 mg/kg of body weight of aspirin solution administered in the right ear vein).
The battery operated, microprocessor programmable CCI instrument (Fig. 1 , left) produces a constant current (in milliamps) and uniform electrical field (in volts per square centimeter) for the treatment duration selected by the surgeon.27 Because aspirin is charged negatively at pH 7.3, the transscleral applicator was made the cathode. Fabricated of silicone elastomer (MED 6033; Nusil, Inc., CA), the custom-made conical transscleral probe for rabbit has an annular surface of 0.5 cm2 and an outer diameter of 17 mm, assuring its location between pars plana and limbus, with a clear opening of 13 mm to avoid contact with the cornea (Fig. 1 , right). Before treatment, the eye was proptosed, and CCI was applied for 10 minutes at a current density of 5 mA/cm2. A peristaltic pump induced circulation under a maximum suction pressure of 25 mm Hg to ensure constant drug flow. A low-impedance, 2-cm2 custom-made rectal probe served as the anodal return electrode, because it avoids the erratic impedance problems associated with dermal patches or subcutaneous needles in rabbits. An audiovisual alarm indicated poor contact or accidental disruption of the circuit, and because the instrument continuously recorded the total coulomb delivered, a controlled and calibrated delivery of the drug was ensured. The transscleral ocular probe was sterilized by autoclaving, and the drug solutions were prepared under an aseptic laminar flow hood and filtered through a 0.22-µm filter.
|
Aspirin Blood Plasma Concentration
At 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after CCI, topical, and IV treatments, blood was taken out of the ear artery in every living animal to analyze the systemic distribution of aspirin. The last blood samples were taken immediately before death.
Transscleral CCI
Forty eyes received transscleral aspirin CCI (2.5 mA, 10 minutes). These rabbits were killed and the eyes enucleated at 0.5 (n = 4), 1 (n = 6), 2 (n = 6), 4 (n = 6), 6 (n = 12), and 8 (n = 6) hours after treatment and the eyes dissected under a surgical microscope.
Topical Application
Three animals received a 10-minute application of aspirin in both eyes through the transscleral applicator, with no current applied. One hour after treatment, the rabbits were put under general anesthesia, and the anterior segment, vitreous cavity, and fundus were examined by slit lamp biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Thereafter, the animals were killed and the eyes (n = 6) enucleated and immediately dissected.
Intravenous Injection
Sixteen animals were used. After death, the eyes were enucleated at 1 (n = 6), 2 (n = 6), 4 (n = 4), 6 (n = 6), and 8 (n = 10) and dissected.
Tissue Dissection and HPLC Analysis
After enucleation, the aqueous humor and vitreous were aspirated with a 1-mL syringe and a 25-gauge needle, and the eyes were dissected under the surgical microscope. To analyze the ocular distribution of aspirin, the conjunctiva, muscle, orbital fat tissue, anterior sclera, cornea, anterior uvea (iris and ciliary body), lens, retina, choroid, posterior sclera, and optic nerve were harvested in vials (Eppendorf, Fremont, CA) and kept frozen at -80°C until further processing. All ocular tissues were dissected and used in their whole. The anterior sclera was defined as the area of the location of the transscleral eye electrode between the limbus and pars plana. This area was approximately 2 mm in annular length. To ensure the reproducibility of the dissection, the same person always performed the process.
Before extraction, wet and dry weights of all tissue samples were measured (reproducibility, >0.1 mg). Defined volumes of distilled water (Millipore, Bedford, MA.) were added (100600 µL related to dry tissue weight) to the lyophilized tissues and kept at room temperature overnight. After centrifugation for 25 minutes at 15,000g, supernatant was extracted and methanol was added (ratio 1:2 by volume; HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich). Samples were vortexed for 1 minute and centrifuged at 15,000g for 25 minutes for protein precipitation and, if necessary, filtered. Liquid samples were diluted in methanol (1:2) and processed as described earlier.
Although administered as acetylsalicylic acid, concentrations of salicylate were measured in ocular tissues and fluids, because it is the active and stable metabolite of aspirin. SA levels were measured by an HPLC system, consisting of an isocratic pump (model LC 250), an autosampler (model LC ISS 2000), and a variable spectrophotometer (model LC 95 UV/visible; all from Perkin Elmer, Wellsley, MA). The column selected was a reversed-phase column (pore size 8 nm, particle size 5 µm, 25 cm x 4.6 mm; model OD5-C18; Baxter International, Deerfield, IL) fitted with a guard column (5 µm, 10 x 4.6 mm, Spherisorb ODS-2; Sigma-Aldrich) and equilibrated at room temperature with a mobile phase of a mixture of distilled water-acetonitrile-phosphoric acid (76:24:0.5, , HPLC-grade, pH 1.85; Sigma-Aldrich) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The detection limit was on the range of 0.01 µg/mL at UV detection at 295 nm.30 31
To calibrate the HPLC system, salicylic acid (SA) standard solutions were prepared in acetonitrile in five concentrations spanning the range of samples tested. The method was found to be linear over the concentration range of SA examined. Calibration was repeated several times during the study to ensure reliability.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical evaluation was performed on a logarithmic scale. Two tailed t-test and ANOVA with the Duncan multiple range and the least-significant-difference post hoc tests were used to examine the relation between concentrations, time course, treatment. P <0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Although the right and the left eyes were treated by CCI, the measured blood plasma levels stayed remarkably low (4.3 ± 1.5 to 2.4 ± 0.4 µg/mL). This result suggests that this means of administration is a method involving nearly negligible systemic drug exposure. The achieved ocular tissue levels cannot be explained by systemic uptake and rediffusion of SA, because the blood plasma concentrations measured (4.9 ± 1.5 to 2.4 ± 0.4 µg/mL) are insufficient to produce the amounts of SA obtained in intraocular tissues (Table 2 ; Fig. 4 ).
Topical Application
Tissue samples of the control group demonstrated significantly lower concentrations of SA in the posterior segment of the eye than animals treated by CCI or IV injection. Levels for CCI were 8 times higher in the retina (P < 0.001), 5 times higher in the choroid (P < 0.001), and 11 times higher in the optic nerve (P < 0.001) than in control eyes (Table 3)
. Levels with IV injection were 5 times higher in the retina an choroid (P < 0.001) and up to 17 times higher in the optic nerve (P < 0.001) than with topical application (Table 3)
.
|
Eye tissue concentrations of topically applied SA were significantly lower than with CCI- and IV treatments overall, but especially in the posterior segment. Blood levels after CCI and topical application were in the same range, but blood levels of intravenously treated animals were 28 times (P < 0.001) higher. These data prove that high tissue levels reached by CCI are an effect of current-enforced migration of drug molecules into the eye and are not of systemic distribution and blood transport as in IV application.
Treatment by IV Injection
SA levels were measured in all tissues of the eye until 8 hours after administration. The highest amounts of SA were observed 2 hours after treatment, suggesting a systemic distribution through peripheral tissue diffusion of the drug and its metabolites. At all time points, the highest level was found in the anterior uvea, conjunctiva, and choroid. The concentration of SA increased between 1 and 2 hours for all tissues followed by a steady decrease to 8 hours, at which point approximately 30% of the highest peaks remained (Tables 1
2
; Figs. 3
4
5
). In the aqueous and vitreous humors, the trend was similar (Fig. 4)
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We found that a single transscleral CCI application of aspirin achieved higher initial intraocular concentrations than IV application. At 2 hours after treatments, tissue levels of CCI and systemic drug administration were similar. In contrast, throughout the measured time, CCI application of aspirin produced significantly lower blood levels (P < 0.001) than IV administration. Comparing the maximal tissue concentrations achieved by CCI and IV injection, significantly higher levels were reached by CCI in the anterior uvea (P < 0.001), aqueous (P < 0.001), retina (P < 0.001), and choroid (P < 0.001). The difference in vitreous (P = 0.54) and optic nerve (P = 0.88) levels were not significant.
Transscleral CCI resulted in a high initial drug concentration in the anterior segment tissues, producing a depot effect, and prolonged diffusion through the choroid and retina. It appears as though the migration of drug molecules from the anterior chamber to the posterior segment does not using the direct pathway from the iris-ciliary body through the vitreous to the posterior pole. A direct distribution by the vitreous diffusion route would probably result in higher vitreous SA levels than those measured in our experiment. It seems much more likely that the transscleral CCI-induced drug molecule migration of SA may go from the anterior to the posterior pole by using the directly affected tissues such as the sclera, retina, and choroid. Therefore, the insignificant salicylate concentration differences in the vitreous between the CCI and IV injection may be the result of distribution of the drug molecules from the posterior segment tissues into the liquid of the vitreous by simple passive diffusion. Elsewhere (e.g., the retina and choroid), the drug distribution pattern appears to be more affected by such factors as the blood flow for systemic distribution or, in the case of transscleral CCI, on the area where the electrode is placed. Topical application resulted in the lowest concentrations, demonstrating that the electrical field induced the penetration of aspirin into the eye.
Maurice and Hughes33 detailed the main factors influencing iontophoretic drug delivery as current density, duration of treatment, drug concentration, pH, and the permeability capacity of the tissue for the drug molecules. Transcorneal and transscleral iontophoresis of antifungal, antibacterial, and antimitotic agents have been reported on animals with varying results.34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Furthermore, studies on iontophoresis of oligonucleotides and peptides have revealed the potential of this application method for future drug delivery.42 43 44 However, as demonstrated by several toxicity and safety studies, this treatment modality is not without risk of complications.27 45 46 47 Transscleral iontophoresis may lead to retinal and choroidal cell damage, resulting in thinning and disorganization of retinal layers. When tissues are being damaged by heat, changes in hydration level, and/or mechanical disorganization during treatment, their impedance changes with time, resulting in variable electrical fields (volts per square centimeter), which affects the iontophoretic drug transfer characteristics. This can easily occur at the epithelial surface (e.g., conjunctiva) when high current densities are applied. To avoid these problems, a CCI system was developed27 that produces and maintains a constant electrical field across the conjunctival epithelium barrier, a constant drug flow, and minute negative pressure that secures and maintains continuity of the tissue to drug solution interface. The system adapts to tissue impedance changes that mainly occur at the site of the return electrode and automatically maintains a constant current, thereby assuring a constant defined drug supply.
The threshold for avoiding ocular toxicity due to transscleral iontophoresis has been determined to be a current density of 500 mA/cm2 at a duration of 5 minutes.28 In our experiment, we administered a current density of 5 mA/cm2, which is 100 times less than the recommended safety parameter. Although we applied CCI for 10 minutes instead of 5 minutes, by keeping the applied current density at such a low level, we were able to avoid retinal toxicity. Furthermore, the electrode lies over the less visually critical pars plana. Because the electrode covers an annular area between the limbus and pars plana with a clear corneal window, corneal exposure is also avoided.
In conclusion, the treatment duration of 10 minutes at a current density of 5 mA/cm2 was shown to be safe48 and, as we demonstrated in this study, efficacious for intraocular drug delivery. Additional animal studies are needed to assess pharmacokinetics beyond 8 hours and the safety and efficiency of repetitive CCI treatments.49 Transscleral CCI was shown in animal studies to be painless and easy to apply and the treatment time relatively brief. The application of the CCI electrode does not require any surgical skill. In pilot human trials a similar ocular electrode was used and the return electrode, a 3-M patch, was placed on the skin of the forehead. The participating patients did not demonstrate or report any subjective signs of discomfort or pain.50
Our study confirms the safety of administering aspirin by CCI. No damage was observed in the anterior or posterior segment of the eye, except for slight conjunctival injection that disappeared 8 hours after treatment. We also demonstrated transscleral application of aspirin by CCI to be an effective noninvasive drug delivery system capable of achieving higher initial SA levels in ocular tissues than IV administration while avoiding systemic exposure. The low plasma levels that resulted from CCI may avoid the undesirable systemic effects associated with aspirin, such as platelet dysfunction, drug interactions, gastrointestinal bleeding, aspirin-induced asthma, hepatotoxicity, and plasma acid-base alterations.
To demonstrate and study the potential therapeutic utility and efficacy of transscleral administration of aspirin or other NSAIDs by CCI several pathogenic pathways may be of investigational interest. These include direct cyclooxygenase inhibition, indirect mediation of the expression of VEGF and bFGF,15 inhibition of T-lymphocyte56 57 activity, and PGE2 inhibition for the management of epinephrine-induced cystoid macular edema,51 neovascularization,52 retinopathy of prematurity,53 proliferative vitreoretinopathy,54 55 and experimental uveitis.39 40
CCI delivery of NSAIDS may be an alternative treatment modality for a wide range of ophthalmic complications. It is a safe, topical, noninvasive drug administration system that has been shown to achieve high intraocular drug concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure. The ease of administration and the potential for repetitive application of drug by transscleral CCI make this treatment modality of special interest in chronic and long-term intraocular diseases.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication May 15, 2001; revised January 22, 2002; accepted March 1, 2002.
Commercial relationships policy: F.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Jean-Marie Parel, Ophthalmic Biophysics Center, 1638 NW 10th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136; jmparel{at}miami.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Zheng, S. J. Howell, D. A. Hatala, K. Huang, and T. S. Kern Salicylate-Based Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Inhibit the Early Lesion of Diabetic Retinopathy Diabetes, February 1, 2007; 56(2): 337 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hayden, M.-E. Jockovich, T. G. Murray, M. T. Kralinger, M. Voigt, E. Hernandez, W. Feuer, and J.-M. Parel Iontophoretic delivery of Carboplatin in a murine model of retinoblastoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 3717 - 3721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Horwath-Winter, O Schmut, E-M Haller-Schober, A Gruber, and G Rieger Iodide iontophoresis as a treatment for dry eye syndrome Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2005; 89(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Hayden, M.-E. Jockovich, T. G. Murray, M. Voigt, P. Milne, M. Kralinger, W. J. Feuer, E. Hernandez, and J.-M. Parel Pharmacokinetics of Systemic Versus Focal Carboplatin Chemotherapy in the Rabbit Eye: Possible Implication in the Treatment of Retinoblastoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 3644 - 3649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Li, E.-K. Jeong, and M. S. Hastings Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Current and Ion Delivery into the Eye during Transscleral and Transcorneal Iontophoresis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1224 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |