|
|
||||||||
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Gene knockout and wild-type mice (C57BL/6 background) were infected intracorneally with HSV-1 (strain RE) and observed through clinical examination and immunohistochemistry for the development of corneal opacity. Virus corneal titers were determined by standard plaque assay on Vero cells. Cytokine and chemokine levels in corneal lysates were measured with commercial ELISA kits.
RESULTS. Corneal opacity in IL-6-/- mice was substantially
diminished in comparison with IL-6+/+ hosts 24 to 48 hours
after intracorneal viral infection, and corneal levels of (MIP)-2 and
MIP-1
were significantly reduced. Local administration of IL-6 at
the time of infection restored corneal opacity and chemokine levels to
that of wild-type hosts. Antibody neutralization of endogenous IL-6 in
IL-6+/+ animals reduced corneal opacity scores and MIP-2
levels to that of IL-6-/- mice. Ex vivo studies with
excised corneal buttons revealed that uninfected IL-6-/-
corneas injected with IL-6 produced MIP-2 and MIP-1
at levels
comparable to that seen in IL-6+/+ hosts.
CONCLUSIONS. Collectively, these results suggest that IL-6 promotes corneal
inflammation by acting in an autocrineparacrine fashion to induce
resident corneal cells to make MIP-2 and MIP-1
, which in turn
recruit neutrophils to the virus infection site.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, IL-6 can also function as an anti-inflammatory cytokine. For
example, Xing et al.9
reported that acute inflammatory
responses in animal models of endotoxic lung or endotoxemia were more
severe in IL-6-/- mice. Administration of
recombinant IL-6 reduced circulating levels of proinflammatory
mediators. IL-6 can also produce an anti-inflammatory effect by
inducing glucocorticoids and natural antagonists of IL-1
(reviewed
in Ref. 10
). Additionally, IL-6 may exist as a
bystander, neither actively promoting nor inhibiting
inflammation.11
Ongoing studies in our laboratory have sought to identify and characterize the mediators that participate in the inflammatory cascade in the herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1infected murine cornea. In this model, the inflammatory response can progress over a 14- to 21-day period to severe stromal keratitis, causing permanent blindness.12 13 14 As part of the early warning alarm system, IL-6 appears rapidly after both virus15 and bacterial infection.16 17 18 Indeed, it is one of the more abundantly produced cytokines and can persist as inflammation progresses.
IL-6 is made by a wide variety of cell types, including those found in
ocular tissue. We have shown that IL-1
and TNF-
can induce human
corneal fibroblasts and epithelial cells to synthesize and secrete
IL-6.19
Additionally, studies in excised mouse corneas
have revealed that IL-6 mRNA induced by endogenous IL-1
is found in
all three resident corneal cell types and that the corneal epithelial
layer is the most abundant producer of protein.20
Kanangat
et al.21
have reported that HSV-1 infection selectively
upregulates IL-6 gene expression in the murine epithelial-like cell
line EMT-6.
Although IL-6 is quickly produced after HSV-1 corneal infection, it is
not known whether it is a necessary component of the inflammatory
cascade. We, therefore, initiated studies to investigate whether IL-6
may be involved in the modulation of chemokine expression. We focused
on macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 and MIP-1
, because these
chemokines are known to rapidly recruit neutrophils into the cornea
after HSV-1 infection.22
The experimental approach was to
compare the inflammatory response elicited by HSV-1 intracorneal
infection in IL-6 genedeficient mice with that of their wild-type
counterparts. In this study, IL-6 was a critical component of the early
inflammatory response. Our data indicate that IL-6 enhanced the
production of MIP-2 and MIP-1
, chemokines important in the
recruitment of neutrophils into the HSV-1infected cornea.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antibodies and Reagents
Rat IgG mAb to mouse IL-6 and murine recombinant IL-1
were
purchased from Biosource International (Camarillo, CA); recombinant
murine (rm)IL-6 from Endogen, Inc. (Woburn, MA); and hamster
IgG monoclonal antibody to mouse IL-1
from R&D Systems (Minneapolis,
MN). Rat RB6-8C5 monoclonal antibody (mAb), a gift from Robert Coffman
(DNAX Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA), was prepared as
previously described.23
RB6-8C5 mAb reacts with the Ly-6G
antigen, which is expressed on neutrophils and other granulocytes at a
level that directly correlates to the differentiation and maturation
stage of the cell.
Intracorneal and Subconjunctival Inoculations
Intracorneal injection was accomplished by first puncturing the
corneal epithelium wall with a 30-gauge disposable needle. A 30-cm
32-gauge stainless steel needle attached to a dispenser (Hamilton,
Reno, NV) was then threaded into the corneal stroma and 1.0 µL of
solution containing the appropriate dose of HSV-1 strain RE
(103105 plaque-forming
units [PFU]) was injected. In some experiments the 1.0-µL inoculum
contained a mixture of HSV-1 (105 PFU/µL)
admixed with mAb to IL-6 (5 µg/µL) or rmIL-6 (50 ng/µL). These
mixtures were prepared immediately before use and directly
administered. Pilot studies established that neither addition of IL-6
nor antibody to IL-6 impaired virus infectivity. Subconjunctival
antibody injections were performed by using a 2-cm 32-gauge needle and
syringe (Hamilton) to penetrate the perivascular region of the
conjunctiva and deliver 4 µL into the subconjunctival space. To score
corneal opacity, eyes were graded on a scale of 0 to +4 by visual
observation, using a dissecting biomicroscope. Eyes were graded as
follows: 0, clear cornea; +1, slight corneal haze; +2, moderate corneal
opacity; +3, severe corneal opacity with visible iris; +4, severe
corneal opacity with iris not visible. Eyes were examined in a coded
manner, with the reader unaware of the treatment administered.
Incubation of Corneas Ex Vivo
After intracorneal injection, the corneas were immediately
excised, trimmed with a 2-mm trephine, and incubated individually in
200 to 250 µL RPMI-1640 medium in a polypropylene tube at 37°C in
5% CO2 for 10 hours. The medium, with or
without, corneas was then frozen at -70°C.
Chemokine and Cytokine Assays
Samples containing corneas were thawed, minced, and processed
for 80 seconds (Tissue Tearer; Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK),
sonicated for 20 seconds, and clarified by centrifugation at
150g for 10 minutes, thus producing clarified corneal
lysates. Samples (clarified corneal lysates or supernatant) were
assayed by ELISA for MIP-2, MIP-1
, and IL-6. The MIP-2 kit (assay
sensitivity, 1.5 pg/mL), and MIP-1
kit (assay sensitivity, 1.5
pg/mL), were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). The IL-6 kit
(assay sensitivity, 7.0 pg/mL) were purchased from Endogen, Inc.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a slight
modification of the procedure of Hendricks et al.24
Infected eyes were enucleated and embedded in optimal cutting
temperature compound (Tissue Tek; Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA) and
6-µm sections were cut at -20°C. The sections were fixed in cold
acetone for 10 minutes and then blocked with normal goat serum. The
primary antibody, RB6-8C5 (5 µg/mL) was applied to the tissue for 1
hour at room temperature. The sections were then washed and stained
using the streptavidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase staining
procedure, according to the manufacturers protocol (Zymed
Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA). The slides were washed in
distilled water and counterstained in Harris hematoxylin for 3 minutes.
The slides were then examined under a light microscope, and pictures
were taken (BX50 camera; Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan).
Neutrophil Isolation and Stimulation
Bone marrow (BM) was flushed from the femur and tibia with media
(RPMI-1640 with 5% newborn calf serum) using a syringe and 25-gauge
needle. The BM cells were centrifuged (1200 rpm for 5 minutes), washed
twice, layered over a gradient (Histopaque 1119 and 1077; Sigma, St.
Louis, MO), and centrifuged at 700g for 30 minutes. The
enriched neutrophil layer was removed, washed twice in medium and
treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (Sigma). Contaminating
monocytes were depleted by adherence (30 minutes at 37°C) to a
polystyrene tissue culture plate25
(Corning Glass Co.,
Corning, NY). Neutrophil purity was consistently more than 99%, as
assessed by staining (HEMA 3; Biochemical Sciences Inc., Swedesboro,
NJ) of cytospin slides (Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA).
For stimulation 1 x 106 neutrophils in 0.5
mL medium were placed in triplicate in 24-well tissue culture plates
(Corning Glass Co.). The wells were precoated with 0.5 mL newborn calf
serum per well for 1 hour at 37°C and then washed three times with
PBS. Stimulations were performed by the addition of rmIL-6 to wells at
a final concentration of 5 or 50 ng/mL. rmIL-1
was used at 1 or 10
ng/mL. Phorbol 12-myristae, 13 acetate (PMA; 30 ng/mL) served
as the positive control and medium only as the negative control. After
incubation for 8 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2
supernatants were removed, clarified by centrifugation, and assayed for
chemokine content by ELISA.
Statistical Analysis
The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine significant
differences in the corneal opacity scores between treated and control
groups. Students t-test was used to evaluate mediator
responses between treated and control cells. The level of confidence at
which the results were judged significant was P <
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
(Fig. 3C) relative to that seen in control mice treated with
virus only. Furthermore, the amounts of each mediator were comparable
to the levels found in the corneas of the IL-6+/+
hosts and thus correlated with increased mean corneal opacity scores.
|
|
in Infected and Uninfected Corneal
Tissue
(Fig. 6)
.
|
|
(Fig. 7B)
. These amounts
were comparable to that stimulated by IL-6 in uninfected wild-type
corneas.
|
Induction in Neutrophils
synthesis in these cells. Figure 8
depicts representative data from one of four independent experiments.
Five or 50 ng/mL IL-6 added to bone marrowderived neutrophils did not
enhance production of MIP-2 or MIP-1
above background levels (a less
than twofold increase). In contrast, IL-1
stimulated a two- to
sixfold increase in MIP-1
. MIP-2 production was also enhanced by
IL-1
in a dose-dependent manner, although the amounts generated were
substantially lower (18- to 31-fold) than MIP-1
. Neutrophils
stimulated with 30 ng/mL PMA produced on average 209 pg/mL MIP-2 and
2198 pg/mL MIP-1
. Incubation of neutrophils with both IL-6 and
MIP-1
did not elevate chemokine production above that seen with
IL-1
alone.
|
when
tested as described. However, IL-1
at 10 ng/mL induced a six- and
ninefold increase in MIP-2 and MIP-1
, respectively, over background
levels. The inability of IL-6 to induce chemokine production by
neutrophils was also observed when the incubation period was extended
from 10 to 18 hours. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are several mechanisms by which HSV-1 infection could induce
IL-6. One is that virus infection may directly activate IL-6 gene
expression in corneal cells.21
Alternatively, virus
infection may induce IL-1
, which in turn induces IL-6. This latter
possibility is supported by earlier studies that showed that synthesis
of IL-6 stimulated by mechanical trauma in excised corneal buttons was
abrogated by antibody to IL-1
but not antibodies to IL-1ß or
TNF-
.20
Our present data provide evidence that IL-6 promoted induction of
neutrophil chemoattractants. Initial evidence for this conclusion comes
from in vivo studies that show that IL-6 administered to infected
corneas of IL-6-/- mice elevates MIP-2 and
MIP-1
to wild-type levels and that antibody neutralization of IL-6
locally in wild-type corneas reduces MIP-2 to
IL-6-/- levels. It is worth noting that our
follow-up ex vivo studies demonstrated that uninfected as well as
infected resident cells in corneal tissue exposed to IL-6 produced
MIP-2 and MIP-1
. Thus, IL-6 induction of chemokines does not require
that the corneal cells be infected. Collectively, a likely scenario
based on our findings is that HSV-1 corneal infection initiates an
inflammatory cascade in which IL-1
induces IL-6 and then these two
cytokines through autocrineparacrine action stimulate resident
corneal cells to produce neutrophil chemoattractants. An earlier report
showing that IL-1
inoculated into the mouse cornea results in the
production of MIP-222
is compatible with this conclusion.
In contrast to resident corneal cells, exposure of purified mouse
neutrophils to recombinant IL-6 caused little or no elevation of MIP-2
or MIP-1
. However, IL-1
induced substantial levels of MIP-1
and more modest but significant amounts of MIP-2. This suggests that
resident cells in the cornea are the principal targets of IL-6, whereas
IL-1
acts on both resident corneal cells and infiltrating
leukocytes. Whether IL-6 can induce infected corneal cells or
infiltrating neutrophils to make and secrete other proinflammatory
mediators remains to be determined. Additionally, IL-6 may also
influence the effector responses of neutrophils.27
It has been reported that IL-10 is produced constitutively in the mouse
cornea and acts to antagonize development of virus-induced
inflammation.28
It may be speculated that IL-6 enhances
corneal disease because it suppresses endogenous IL-10 expression.
However, in three independent experiments we found that administration
of IL-6 to IL-6-/- mice did not alter IL-10
corneal levels (Fenton and Lausch, unpublished observations,
2001). In contrast, antibody neutralization of endogenous IL-10
significantly enhanced production of IL-6, MIP-2, and
MIP-1
.28
We conclude that HSV-1 infection of
IL-6deficient mice did not result in upregulation of the
anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 as was seen in Candida
albicans infection.29
IL-6-/- mice have been observed to produce a
lower antibody response or a reduced cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response to
certain selected viral pathogens30
but not
others.31
We found that although HSV-1 ocular titers in
IL-6-/- mice were similar to those of
IL-6+/+ hosts at 48 hours after infection 8 of 15
(53%) showed development of fatal encephalitis, whereas only 1 of 15
(7%) IL-6+/+ mice died. These results are in
agreement with the report of LeBlanc et al.32
Neutrophils
and mononuclear cells are known to help limit HSV-1 growth and spread
to the central nervous system after ocular infection.23
33
Their diminished early recruitment due to reduced MIP-2 and MIP-1
production would be expected to increase
IL-6-/- host susceptibility to HSV-1. Our
results may also help to explain the impaired neutrophil recruitment
and increased susceptibility seen in IL-6-/-
mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes34
and
C. albicans.29
In addition, or alternatively,
the stronger inflammatory response in the IL-6+/+
cornea may generate a cytokine milieu that favors a greater, and thus
more protective, T helper cell-1 response.35
36
In summary, our findings showed IL-6 to be an important participant in
the cytokine cascade triggered by HSV-1 corneal infection. By inducing
neutrophil chemoattractants IL-6 amplified the inflammatory response.
Our data are in agreement with the report of Smith et
al.,37
wherein IL-6 was associated with MIP-1
expression in a bleomycin-induced lung injury model. Also, Romano et
al.35
observed that IL-6-/- mice
exhibit reduced chemokine production and defective leukocyte
recruitment in subcutaneous air pouches injected with inflammatory
stimuli. This defect could be reversed by IL-6 administration. In
follow-up studies IL-6 itself did not induce human endothelial cells,
which have no IL-6R, to make chemokine, but IL-6soluble
(s)IL-6R complexes were active. Collectively, these studies and ours
indicate that chemokine production can be induced in distinctly
different cell types by IL-6 per se, or by IL-6sIL-6R complexes. This
suggests that IL-6 in one form or another may promote chemokine
expression in a variety of tissues. Thus, IL-6 represents a potential
therapeutic target for suppressing ocular inflammation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication July 17, 2001; revised November 13, 2001; accepted November 21, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734
solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Robert N. Lausch, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of South Alabama, MSB 2096, 307 University, Mobile, AL 36688; rlausch{at}jaguar1.usouthal.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. S. Bhattacharjee, D. M. Neumann, T. P. Foster, C. Clement, G. Singh, H. W. Thompson, H. E. Kaufman, and J. M. Hill Effective Treatment of Ocular HSK with a Human Apolipoprotein E Mimetic Peptide in a Mouse Eye Model Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4263 - 4268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zheng, M. A. Fields, Y. Liu, H. Cathcart, E. Richter, and S. S. Atherton Neutrophils Protect the Retina of the Injected Eye from Infection after Anterior Chamber Inoculation of HSV-1 in BALB/c Mice Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 4018 - 4025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, K. Kimura, R. Yanai, T.-i. Chikama, and T. Nishida Cytokine, Chemokine, and Adhesion Molecule Expression Mediated by MAPKs in Human Corneal Fibroblasts Exposed to Poly(I:C) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 3336 - 3344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Divito and R. L. Hendricks Activated Inflammatory Infiltrate in HSV-1-Infected Corneas without Herpes Stromal Keratitis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 1488 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Molesworth-Kenyon, R. Yin, J. E. Oakes, and R. N. Lausch IL-17 receptor signaling influences virus-induced corneal inflammation J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2008; 83(2): 401 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lundberg, H. Openshaw, M. Wang, H.-J. Yang, and E. Cantin Effects of CXCR3 Signaling on Development of Fatal Encephalitis and Corneal and Periocular Skin Disease in HSV-Infected Mice Are Mouse-Strain Dependent Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 4162 - 4170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Robbins, C. M. T. Bauer, N. Vujicic, G. J. Gaschler, B. D. Lichty, E. G. Brown, and M. R. Stampfli Cigarette Smoke Impacts Immune Inflammatory Responses to Influenza in Mice Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2006; 174(12): 1342 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kim, P. P. Sarangi, Y. Lee, S. Deshpande Kaistha, S. Lee, and B. T. Rouse Depletion of MCP-1 increases development of herpetic stromal keratitis by innate immune modulation J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 80(6): 1405 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hayashi, L. C. Hooper, M. S. Chin, C. N. Nagineni, B. Detrick, and J. J. Hooks Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) DNA and immune complex (HSV-1-human IgG) elicit vigorous interleukin 6 release from infected corneal cells via Toll-like receptors. J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2006; 87(Pt 8): 2161 - 2169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Biswas, K. Banerjee, B. Kim, P. R. Kinchington, and B. T. Rouse Role of Inflammatory Cytokine-Induced Cycloxygenase 2 in the Ocular Immunopathologic Disease Herpetic Stromal Keratitis J. Virol., August 15, 2005; 79(16): 10589 - 10600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Martinez, Y. Juarranz, C. Abad, A. Arranz, B. G. Miguel, F. Rosignoli, J. Leceta, and R. P. Gomariz Analysis of the role of the PAC1 receptor in neutrophil recruitment, acute-phase response, and nitric oxide production in septic shock J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2005; 77(5): 729 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Biswas, K. Banerjee, M. Zheng, and B. T. Rouse Counteracting corneal immunoinflammatory lesion with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist protein J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2004; 76(4): 868 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Biswas, K. Banerjee, B. Kim, and B. T. Rouse Mice Transgenic for IL-1 Receptor Antagonist Protein Are Resistant to Herpetic Stromal Keratitis: Possible Role for IL-1 in Herpetic Stromal Keratitis Pathogenesis J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3736 - 3744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Banerjee, P. S. Biswas, B. Kim, S. Lee, and B. T. Rouse CXCR2-/- Mice Show Enhanced Susceptibility to Herpetic Stromal Keratitis: A Role for IL-6-Induced Neovascularization J. Immunol., January 15, 2004; 172(2): 1237 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Seo, H. Y. Park, J. H. Choi, W. Y. Kim, Y. H. Kim, H. W. Jung, B. Kwon, H. W. Lee, and B. S. Kwon Blocking 4-1BB/4-1BB Ligand Interactions Prevents Herpetic Stromal Keratitis J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 576 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-Q. Lin, T. Kondo, Y. Ishida, T. Takayasu, and N. Mukaida Essential involvement of IL-6 in the skin wound-healing process as evidenced by delayed wound healing in IL-6-deficient mice J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2003; 73(6): 713 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||