|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and 2Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Reversible branch retinal artery occlusion was produced by pressing with a glass probe onto an artery emerging from the superior part of the optic disc in the retina of anesthetized cats. During 2-hour occlusion episodes, the cats breathed 100% O2, 1 hour of air and 1 hour of 100% O2, 1 hour of air and 1 hour of 70% O2, or air. Intraretinal ERGs were recorded before, during, and after the occlusion.
RESULTS. Hyperoxia during occlusion preserved intraretinal b-wave amplitude at 86% ± 12% of normal; longer durations of increased oxygenation maintained the b-wave at higher levels during occlusion and increased the probability of b-wave recovery after occlusion; higher O2 content in the breathing gas increased b-wave amplitude during recovery; and hyperoxia during occlusion decreased the time it took for the b-wave to recover after the occlusion.
CONCLUSIONS. Hyperoxia is preferable to air breathing during retinal arterial occlusion not only for maintaining b-wave amplitude during occlusion, but also for providing a shorter recovery time and better percentage recovery after the end of the occlusion. Even if it is not possible to begin hyperoxia at the onset of occlusion, it may still be valuable.
Experimental occlusion of the retinal circulation in animals results in anoxia in the preretinal vitreous5 and inner retina.4 6 In addition, the oxygen consumption (QO2) of the dark-adapted outer retina is reduced by 25%, because the photoreceptors can no longer obtain any O2 from the retinal circulation.4 Patz7 and Flower and Patz8 postulated that increased O2 supply from the choroidal circulation could relieve inner retinal hypoxia. Subsequently, several studies showed that inspiration of 100% O2 during the occlusion was effective in restoring inner retinal PO2 to levels that were normal or nearly normal4 5 6 and in restoring outer retinal QO2.4 This occurred because hyperoxia dramatically elevated the PO2 in the choroid.4 6
In functional terms, experiments with monkeys and cats have revealed that the electroretinogram (ERG) b-wave is reduced during occlusion of the retinal circulation when animals breathed air.3 5 9 10 We have shown that the b-wave recorded intraretinally vanishes during superior retinal artery occlusion in cats.4 Clinical studies have also shown that the ERG is affected during retinal artery occlusion.11 12 Despite the nearly complete recovery of PO2 during hyperoxia, the intraretinal b-wave in the region affected by the occlusion was restored to only 50% of normal in one study.4
Although it is well-established that hyperoxia can restore retinal oxygenation during occlusion, clinical studies on the use of hyperoxia have reported mixed results. Investigators in some clinical studies have observed that administration of hyperbaric O2 does not improve acuity,13 14 except in one case, in which visual ability returned to normal after reperfusion.13 However, other studies suggest that 100% O27 or hyperbaric oxygenation15 16 17 18 may have a beneficial effect if applied early enough. Although these results are variable, administration of a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO219 20 or 100% O2 for short intervals during occlusion has been recommended to prevent retinal functional loss.
The value of oxygen therapy is difficult to gauge from clinical studies, because cases have been reported in the literature in which patients have not been given O2, but still have regained vision after central retinal arterial occlusions lasting from 1.5 hours20 to longer than 4 days.19 The clinical picture is complicated by several factors. First, occlusion may not be complete in all cases. Second, patients generally have various periods of breathing air before being treated with O2. Third, O2 has been used for only brief periods due to potential toxicity to the lungs.
Because of this variability, it is not only difficult to interpret whether oxygen therapy was beneficial in previous work, but also very difficult to use prospective clinical studies to obtain evidence on whether hyperoxia during occlusion is beneficial for restoring vision after occlusion. Animal studies are needed to fill this gap, but no animal studies have been attempted to investigate whether oxygen administered during occlusion is better than air breathing in enhancing recovery in the reperfusion period. In the present work, therefore, we focused on this question, employing parameters that are relevant to the clinical situation. We investigated the intraretinal b-wave during occlusion, but were more interested in recovery after reperfusion (i.e., recovery time and percentage of recovery) than in the changes during occlusion. We allowed an episode of air breathing during occlusion before instituting hyperoxia, to mimic the clinical situation. We chose an occlusion period of 2 hours, because we knew that occlusions of 97 to 98 minutes or more in monkeys breathing air alone lead to irreversible loss of the ERG.3 Furthermore, we investigated whether 70% O2 breathing, which is more clinically viable than 100% O2 for long periods, would promote recovery. We tested the hypotheses that (1) hyperoxia is preferable to air breathing during retinal arterial occlusion, (2) enhanced O2 breathing is beneficial in promoting recovery from an episode of arterial occlusion, and (3) hyperoxia has value even if it is delayed relative to the onset of the occlusion.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To record intraretinal ERGs, the microelectrode was oriented toward the part of the retina supplied by the superior artery or, more often, by the area supplied by a secondary artery arising from the disc and running temporal to the superior artery. This artery was not paired with a vein, so that a simultaneous venous occlusion could be more easily avoided. Intraretinal and vitreal ERGs in response to 2.5-second flashes of diffuse white light at or near rod saturation (
8.6 log quanta [555 nm/deg2-sec]) were recorded during dark adaptation every 60 µm for the first 180 µm during the penetration into the retina and every 30 µm thereafter, until the choroid was reached. After amplification, ERGs were displayed on a storage oscilloscope and sent to a chart recorder and a computer, running data acquisition software (Labtech Notebook; Laboratory Technologies Corp., Wilmington, MA) operated through a shell program (Visual Basic; Microsoft, Redmond, WA).
Occlusion of a Retinal Artery
An occluder was made by pulling a 0.7-mm glass capillary tube to a tip, followed by heating the tip until a ball of 0.5- to 0.7-mm diameter was formed. The occluder was inserted into the eye through a 19-gauge, thin-walled, sealed needle and was attached to a hydraulic microdrive (model 1207S; David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA). To produce an occlusion, the ball was pressed onto an artery emerging from the optic disc.4 Figure 1A shows a schematic representation of the location of the occluder with respect to the vessels. Visual observation of gaps in the vessel was used to verify that an occlusion had been produced. The occlusion was confirmed by a very small or absent intraretinal b-wave while the animal was breathing air during occlusion. At the end of the occlusion period, the occluder was carefully pulled back to allow reperfusion, which was verified by visual inspection.
|
|
|
Vitreal and Intraretinal ERG Analyses
The vitreal and intraretinal ERGs were analyzed by calculating b- and c-wave amplitudes. Typically, the maximum intraretinal b- and c-wave occurred at
50% and
90% retinal depths, respectively.4 23 Table 3 summarizes the amplitudes of retinal and vitreal b-waves in different experimental conditions. The b-waves reported were measured at the location of the maximum retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) c-wave in the subretinal space, called the distal b-wave, rather than at the depth of the maximum b-wave. This convention was adopted because horizontal cell recordings were often inadvertently obtained where the maximum b-wave was expected, making it impossible to isolate the maximum b-wave from the set of traces obtained across the retina. The relationship between maximum b-wave amplitudes and the distal b-waves recorded in the same penetration is linear (r2 = 0.92), with the distal b-wave amplitude being approximately 77% of the maximum b-wave amplitude.24
|
After hypothesis testing (one-tailed t-test) with a significance level of 0.05, power analysis was performed using commercially available software (Power and Precision; BioStat Solutions, Inc., Mt. Airy, MD) to support the results of the t-test. A true difference of 15% in the population mean scores between two conditions was deemed to be functionally significant and was used in the power analysis. (Most of the statistically significant differences reported are larger than 15%.) The SD of the population was estimated as the square root of the summation of the variance divided by the number of data points. The power is given in the text for each test result.
Twelve anesthetized adult male cats were used in the study. The criteria for inclusion in the statistical analyses were to have (1) a full occlusion and (2) a 2-hour occlusion. In some cases (cats 304, 306, 309, and 329), we were able to perform a second occlusion. The preocclusion b-wave amplitudes before the second occlusion were 63%, 74%, 100%, and 57% of the preocclusion b-wave amplitudes before the first occlusion and the time between the two occlusions were 479, 142, 79 and 269 minutes in cats 304, 306, 309, and 329, respectively. Cat 329 was excluded from the analysis because it had a partial second occlusion, whereas cat 328 was excluded from the analysis because the duration of occlusion was longer than 2 hours.
Terminology
In this article, recovery time refers to the time for the intraretinal ERG b-wave amplitude to increase and stabilize after the restoration of retinal circulation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
8.6 log quanta [555 nm/deg2-sec]) during dark adaptation. Unlike the b-wave amplitude, the intraretinal c-wave amplitude did not show any trend under air or oxygen breathing during occlusion, compared with its preocclusion level (data not shown). In an earlier study, it was reported that a paired t-test showed no difference between the RPE c-wave before and during occlusion while the animal breathed air.4 Because the origin of the c-wave is complex and it did not reveal information about inner retinal function, which was expected to be most affected by the occlusion, the results on the c-wave are not reported.
|
|
|
Table 2 summarizes the experimental conditions and results. Table 3 shows the intraretinal and vitreal b-wave amplitudes under these experimental conditions. In all cases, enhanced oxygenation at least partly maintained the intraretinal b-wave (Table 3 , Fig. 4A ). Although the intraretinal b-wave amplitude was reduced to 34% ± 27% and 32% ± 24% of its preocclusion level when the animal was breathing 70% and 100% O2 for 1 hour during occlusion, respectively, the presence of the b-wave was indicative that some inner retinal function was maintained during occlusion. The intraretinal b-wave amplitude was larger during occlusion when the animal breathed 1 hour of 100% O2 (P = 0.011, n = 4, power = 1.00) and 70% O2 (P = 0.055, n = 3, power = 0.85) than when the animal breathed air during occlusion. The intraretinal b-wave amplitude was significantly larger (P = 0.024, n = 4, power = 1.00) during occlusion when the animal breathed 2 hours of 100% O2, as opposed to 1 hour of 100% O2. The changes in the preocclusion versus occlusion intraretinal and vitreal b-wave amplitudes were statistically nonsignificant during enhanced O2 breathing (Table 3) .
Recovery Time of Intraretinal ERGs
A principal purpose of this study was to evaluate the recovery of the retina after occlusion. At the end of the 2-hour occlusion episode, the occluder was slowly withdrawn with the aid of a microdrive. The intraretinal and vitreal ERG amplitudes were recorded for up to 2 hours after the intraretinal b-wave amplitude leveled off and are summarized in Tables 2 and 3 . As shown in Figure 5 , the recovery time reported in Tables 2 and 3 was the time for the intraretinal ERG b-wave amplitude to increase and stabilize after the restoration of retinal circulation.
|
Percentage of Recovery of Intraretinal ERGs
The recovery of the amplitude of the intraretinal b-wave is summarized in Tables 2 and 3 as well as in Figure 6 . In all cases of full occlusion, air breathing during occlusion led to a complete failure of the b-wave to recover. Inspiration of elevated O2 during occlusion helped to restore the intraretinal b-wave amplitude. The intraretinal b-wave amplitude recovery was significantly greater (P = 0.002, n1 = 3, n2 = 2, power = 1.00) when the animal breathed 1 hour of 70% O2 as opposed to air during occlusion. The b-wave amplitude was generally larger after occlusion when the animal breathed 1 hour of 100% O2 as opposed to 70% O2 (55% ± 13% and 48% ± 7% of the preocclusion amplitude respectively), but the difference was statistically insignificant (Fig. 6) . The intraretinal b-wave amplitude recovered to 86% ± 12% of its preocclusion value when the animal breathed 2 hours of 100% O2, which was significantly more than with 1 hour of 100% O2 inspiration (P = 0.011, n = 4, power = 1.00).
|
In cat 307 (1 hour air followed by 100% O2), occlusion did not reverse until an hour after withdrawal of the occluder, so the animal was kept under 100% O2 breathing for this additional hour. Because of the longer occlusion time, this cat was excluded from the statistical analysis, but it shows that supplementation with O2 can allow partial recovery after a 3-hour occlusion (Table 2) .
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The focus in previous animal experiments was on the situation during occlusion. Whether hyperoxia leads to an improved recovery after the end of the occlusion episode has not been explored in any previous experimental work.
In the present study, therefore, we investigated the intraretinal b-wave during occlusion, but were more interested in what happens after reperfusion (i.e., recovery time and percentage of recovery). We focused on parameters that may be achievable in a clinical situation. Although we could not duplicate the case of human retinal artery occlusion exactly, we allowed an episode of air breathing before hyperoxia, because hyperoxic therapy might not be available immediately after the onset of occlusion. We chose to make reversible occlusions of 2 hours duration, because occlusions of 97 to 98 minutes or more have led to irreversible effects on the ERG with air breathing.3 Furthermore, we investigated 70% O2 breathing, which is clinically viable25 for prolonged use.
Consistent with previous experiments, hyperoxia was shown to be beneficial during occlusion, although full recovery could not be achieved.4 When the O2 content of the breathing gas decreased to 21% (air), inner retinal oxygenation decreased and the b-wave amplitude disappeared within minutes. Even with enhanced oxygenation, the retina is acidotic during occlusion,26 and there may be other factors involved in the lack of full recovery during hyperoxia.
Hyperoxia was also preferable to air breathing for allowing recovery of the b-wave after occlusion. Even if hyperoxic therapy was not initiated immediately, it still had substantial therapeutic value. This is evidenced by the experiments in which 1 hour of air breathing was followed by 1 hour of enhanced O2 breathing (either 70% or 100%) during occlusion, which resulted in significant recovery.
Another important finding is that 70% O2, which can be inspired indefinitely without toxicity,25 was as effective in promoting recovery after occlusion as inspiring 100% O2 for 1 hour. Recovery may, however, take longer with 70% O2. We also found that the duration of enhanced oxygenation was critical for the recovery. Experiments with 2 hours of 100% O2 breathing as opposed to 1 hour of 100% O2 breathing showed significantly greater recovery. Although we did not run experiments with 2 hours of 70% O2 breathing, we anticipate that it is preferable to 1 hour. The conclusions were drawn from experiments with a small number of animals, but they had statistical powers of 80% to 100%.
We recognize the danger of generalizing from cat to human and that the treatment protocol used in this study may not be optimal in humans. However, it will probably never be possible to conduct a controlled clinical trial, because occlusions are infrequent, and because their natural history is different from one patient to another. The present work has provided a proof of concept, showing that supplemental oxygen is beneficial under conditions in which better control is possible than in the clinic, even if there is a delay in starting it. It is possible that the recovery observed in cats may be less than could be achieved clinically with hyperoxic therapy, for several reasons. First, the body temperature is higher in cats than in humans, and the tissues are therefore probably metabolically more active and may be damaged more by the absence of adequate oxygen. Second, the physical occlusion method used in the study may cause some trauma to the vessels that may limit recovery. This type of damage may not be present in all cases of human retinal artery occlusion. Third, in a clinical situation, retinal arterial occlusions are rarely complete,27 28 and retinal tolerance to an acute ischemic event is often several hours, rather than minutes.
Pure oxygen for an extended time is toxic and also causes vasoconstriction of the retinal vessels. The vasoconstrictive effect can be counteracted by adding 5% CO2, although this may cause hypercapnia. Atebara et al.29 performed a retrospective study of paracentesis and carbogen inhalation and concluded that such treatments offer minimal benefits. However, in that study, carbogen was administered to the patients by a breathing mask for only 10-minute periods, 1 to 2 hours apart, for a total of 48 to 72 hours. This is more O2 than has been given in other clinical studies, but still would not be expected to maximize the benefit of O2. Earlier, we suggested ventilating patients with a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2 for perhaps 75% of the time during the occlusion, recognizing that compensatory changes for respiratory acidosis would occur.4 On the basis of the present findings, we recommend 70% O2 (with or without CO2) as being almost equally effective. This should be given for as long as it takes an occlusion to resolve and should be started as soon as the occlusion is detected.
In summary, the results obtained in this study suggest an alternative to current treatment of retinal artery occlusion by using 70% O2, which produces almost the same benefits as 100% O2 in terms of ERG recovery, reduces the toxic side effects of 100% or hyperbaric O2, and can be administered for prolonged periods.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication January 22, 2004; revised June 22, 2004; accepted July 1, 2004.
Disclosure: G. Birol, None; E. Budzynski, None; N.D. Wangsa-Wirawan, None; R.A. Linsenmeier, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Robert A. Linsenmeier, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-3107; r-linsenmeier{at}northwestern.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Birol, S. Wang, E. Budzynski, N. D. Wangsa-Wirawan, and R. A. Linsenmeier Oxygen distribution and consumption in the macaque retina Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1696 - H1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |