IOVS AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2004;45:1101-1108.)
© 2004 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.03-1118

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by West, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collinson, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by West, J. D.

Corneal Development, Limbal Stem Cell Function, and Corneal Epithelial Cell Migration in the Pax6+/- Mouse

J. Martin Collinson,1,2 Simon A. Chanas,2 Robert E. Hill,3 and John D. West2

1From the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom; the 2Division of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, Genes and Development Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; and the 3Comparative and Developmental Genetics Section, Medical Research Council [MRC] Human Genetics Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. To investigate the etiology of corneal dysfunction in the Pax6+/- mouse model of aniridia-related keratopathy.

METHODS. Mosaic patterns of X-gal staining were compared in the corneal and limbal epithelia of female Pax6+/- and Pax6+/+ littermates, age 3 to 28 weeks, hemizygous for an X-linked LacZ transgene, and Pax6+/+, LacZ-{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+ and Pax6+/+, LacZ-{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/-, LacZ+ chimeras. Histologic examination of chimeric corneas was performed.

RESULTS. Disrupted patterns of X-gal staining showed that heterozygosity for Pax6 perturbed clonal patterns of growth and development in the corneal and limbal epithelium. Centripetal migration of Pax6+/- corneal epithelial cells was diverted. Normal patterns of centripetal Pax6+/- cell migration and epithelial morphology were restored in Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras. Fewer, larger clones of limbal stem cells were present in Pax6+/- eyes, compared with wild-type. In the chimeras, Pax6+/- limbal stem cells were cell-autonomously depleted or less efficient than wild-type cells at producing progeny to populate the corneal epithelium.

CONCLUSIONS. The correct Pax6 dosage is necessary for normal clonal growth during corneal development, normal limbal stem cell activity, and correct corneal epithelial cell migration. Disruption of normal cell movement in heterozygotes may be the consequence of failure of nonautonomous guidance cues. Degeneration of the corneal surface in aniridia-related keratopathy relates to both a deficiency within the limbal stem cell niche and nonautonomous diversion of corneal epithelial cell migration.


The gene encoding the transcription factor Pax6 is expressed at high levels in all cells of the developing and adult conjunctival, limbal, and corneal epithelia.1 2 3 4 Corneal opacities in PAX6+/- patients5 6 that correlate with vascularization and epithelial fragility, have been termed aniridic keratopathy7 or aniridia-related keratopathy (ARK).8 The Pax6+/- mouse is an excellent model of ARK, recapitulating all the morphologic defects exhibited by humans.4 8 9 Pax6+/- mice have thin, irregular, vacuolated, fragile corneal epithelia, within which the presence of goblet cells may indicate encroachment of conjunctival cells into the corneal field.8 9

The adult corneal epithelium is maintained by a population of limbal stem cells (LSCs).10 11 LSCs produce undifferentiated progeny with limited proliferative potential that migrate centripetally from the periphery of the corneal epithelium to replace cells desquamated during normal life.12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Epithelial thinning and the possible encroachment of conjunctival epithelium could infer a deficiency of LSC activity in ARK or a defective wound-healing response, such that cells lost from the corneal surface are not adequately replaced.19 20 LSC activation and function and patterns of corneal epithelial migration, have not been directly studied in Pax6+/- mice or humans.

We created an assay for LSC function and corneal epithelial migration, using patterns of ß-galactosidase activity in LacZ+ {leftrightarrow}LacZ- chimeras and in female mice carrying an X-linked LacZ transgene.21 The assay revealed that, in wild-type mice, development of the corneal epithelium, with activation of LSCs and centripetal streaming of their progeny into the cornea, is not completed before the 10th postnatal week.

In this study, new series of chimeras and X-inactivation mosaics were produced to define defects in the Pax6+/- corneal epithelium that are relevant to the etiology of ARK. We found development of the corneal epithelium was disrupted, and Pax6+/- LSCs were autonomously defective or depleted. Patterns of Pax6+/- corneal epithelial cell migration were disrupted in Pax6+/- mice but could be corrected in Pax6+/+ {leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras, suggesting that the corneal epithelial defects are not mediated in a cell-autonomous manner.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mosaic Analysis of LSC Function and Corneal Epithelial Cell Movement
All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Pax6Sey/+ and Pax6Sey-Neu/+ stocks and the H253 transgenic line, carrying X-linked LacZ (hereafter XlacZ) expressed from a housekeeping promoter have already been described.22 23 24 25

H253 males (XlacZ+/Y) or homozygous females (XlacZ+/+) were bred with Pax6+/Sey-Neu (Pax6+/-) mates. The eyes of their progeny were fixed and stained with X-gal at 3 to 28 weeks of age.21 Corneal diameters were measured. Mice were genotyped by PCR.23 26 Mosaic patterns of X-gal staining in hemizygous XlacZ+/- females were compared for Pax6+/+ and Pax6+/- littermates.

In the wild-type, each LacZ-expressing blue patch of LSCs produces a blue radial stripe of corneal epithelial cells migrating centripetally in the mature eye.21 Nonexpressing cells appear as white patches or stripes. The pattern of radial stripes in the cornea is a direct assay of the arrangement and size of blue and white patches of LSCs in the limbus. Each blue or white patch derives from one or more independently specified LacZ+ or LacZ- clones of LSCs. As the percentage contribution of LacZ+ cells to the limbus increases, the probability that any single blue stripe is derived from more than one adjacent clone of LacZ+ LSCs increases. The number of coherent clones of LSCs was estimated as described fully in Collinson et al.21 by counting the number of radial stripes and correcting for the total percentage contribution of blue cells to the peripheral cornea using the 1/(1 - p) correction factor described previously,21 27 28 based on Roach.29 The mean width of LSC clones at the corneal boundary was calculated as ({pi} · corneal diameter)/number of clones.

A near-identical protocol was used to estimate clone size in the randomly oriented blue and white patches in corneal epithelia of young mice. A circle corresponding to a diameter of 1 mm was overlaid on scaled photographs of each stained eye. The number and width of blue and white patches cut by this circle were measured, and clone width was calculated. Statistical analyses were calculated on computer (Prism, ver. 3.0; GraphPad, San Diego, CA).

Chimeras
Production of chimeras by aggregation30 has been described elsewhere.23 Eight-cell embryos were obtained from Pax6Sey-Neu/+ females, homozygous for the glucose phosphate isomerase 1-b Gpi1b allele (Pax6Sey-Neu/+; Gpi1b/b), that had been mated to Pax6Sey/+ males, homozygous for the constitutive LacZ transgene TgR(ROSA26)26Sor31 (Pax6Sey/+; LacZ+/+; Gpi1b/b). The embryos were aggregated with eight-cell embryos from a Gpi1a/a, Pax6+/+ wild-type cross (BALB/c x A/J)F2). Chimeras were mixtures of Pax6+/+ LacZ-/- cells, and LacZ+/- cells of various Pax6 genotypes: control chimeras (Pax6+/+, LacZ-/-{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+/-), heterozygous chimeras (Pax6+/+, LacZ-/-{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/-, LacZ+/-), and homozygous mutant chimeras (Pax6+/+, LacZ-/-{leftrightarrow}Pax6-/-, LacZ+/-), which could be distinguished by PCR.23 26

Eyes were dissected at 15 weeks and stained with X-gal. The percentage contribution of LacZ+ cells to the peripheral cornea, Bouter was measured as for the mosaic mice.21 The percentage contribution of blue cells to the central cornea, Binner, measured around a centered circle, two fifths of the corneal radius, was also calculated. Tissues from the forebrain, heart, lungs, spleen, liver, and kidney of each chimera were taken for quantitative GPI1 analysis.32 33 For all aggregations, the eight-cell embryo derived from the wild-type mating was Gpi1a/a, and the eight-cell embryo derived from the Pax6+/Sey-Neu x Pax6Sey/+ mating was Gpi1b/b. Those chimeras with higher %GPI1-A are primarily composed of cells derived from the wild-type mating, and vice versa.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Clonal Analysis of the Pax6+/- Corneal Epithelium
Pax6+/+ H253 male mice, hemizygous for an X-linked LacZ reporter transgene (XlacZ+/Y),25 were mated to nontransgenic Pax6Sey-Neu/+ mice on a CBA/Ca genetic background. Their female progeny were XlacZ+/- and either Pax6Sey-Neu/+ (Pax6+/-) or Pax6+/+, with mosaic XlacZ expression due to random epigenetic X-inactivation in early development. Patterns of X-gal staining in the Pax6+/+ and Pax6+/- female littermates aged 3 to 28 weeks were compared (Fig. 1) to determine whether the development or maintenance of the Pax6+/- corneal epithelium were abnormal. XlacZ-/Y males were used as negative control subjects (these showed no blue staining), and XlacZ+/Y males or XlacZ+/+ females as positive control animals (corneal epithelia were entirely blue).



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Clonal patterns of cell growth and movement in Pax6+/- eyes. Patterns of X-gal staining in corneal epithelia of (A, E, I, M, Q) Pax6+/+ and (BD, FH, JL, NP, RT) Pax6+/- female littermates from crosses of Pax6+/- mice with H253 transgenic mice carrying an X-linked LacZ transgene. Representative eyes are presented at (AD) 3, (EH) 6, (IL) 9, (MP) 15, and (QT) 28 weeks. Scale bar, 500 µm.

 
Abnormal Patterns of Growth during Postnatal Development of the Pax6+/- Cornea.
Three-week old Pax6+/+ mice showed fine-scale patterns of randomly oriented blue and white patches in the corneal epithelium, identical with those seen previously21 (12/12 corneas; Fig. 1A ). In contrast, Pax6+/- littermates were extremely variable (eight corneas; Figs. 1B 1C 1D ), both between individuals and between different eyes in the same individual. Pax6+/- patch sizes were larger (Figs. 1B 1C 1D) . For each eye, blue and white patch sizes were corrected on the basis of the percentage of LacZ+ cells, to estimate the mean coherent clone width at 0.5 mm from the center of the cornea (see the Methods section). Coherent clones of corneal epithelial cells were larger and more variable for Pax6+/- (mean, 60.9 ± 7.6 µm; n = 6) than for Pax6+/+ corneas (mean, 28.2 ± 2.1 µm; n = 7; t-test: P = 0.006) even though the Pax6+/- corneas were of smaller diameter (2.26 ± 0.06 mm) than wild-type (2.39 ± 0.02 mm).

LSCs become active at 5 to 6 weeks in wild-type mice.21 Six-week old Pax6+/- XlacZ+ female mice had thin corneal epithelia with large, randomly oriented patches of LacZ+ cells (Figs. 1F 1G) that contrasted with the patterns of dense, small, randomly oriented clones with radial stripes emerging from the limbus shown by their wild-type littermates (Fig. 1E) . Clone size was significantly larger in Pax6+/- eyes (131.47 ± 9.35 µm, n = 6) than Pax6+/+ (83.88 ± 6.63 µm, n = 8; P = 0.002).

LSC Clones and Patterns of Migration in the Pax6+/- Cornea.
From 9 to 28 weeks, Pax6+/+ XlacZ+/- corneal epithelia developed patterns of radial stripes due to centripetal immigration of LSC-derived cells21 (Figs. 1I 1J 1K 1L 1M 1N 1O 1P 1Q 1R 1S 1T) . Tissue sections confirmed that staining was epithelial and that apical cells were clonally related to underlying basal cells (at any point on the cornea, the entire thickness of the epithelium was either blue or white). Nearly all Pax6+/- XlacZ+/- eyes showed evidence of radial patterns, sometimes almost normal (Figs. 1P 1T) . In most Pax6+/- eyes, although clear radial stripes emerged from the limbus, they became disorganized, giving patchwork or deviating patterns toward the center of the cornea that reflected diversions from normal centripetal migration (Figs. 1O 1S) .

Measurement of the width and number of the blue and white stripes near the corneal periphery allowed an estimate of the number and width of coherent clones of LSCs responsible for producing the striped patterns in eyes of both genotypes (see the Methods section). At every age, significantly fewer, larger LSC clones were active in the Pax6+/- corneas than in their Pax6+/+ littermates (Table 1 ; Fig. 2 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. LSC Clone Number and Width in Pax6+/+ and Pax6+/- Mice

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Size and number of LSC clones in Pax6+/- and wild-type eyes. Mean number ± SEM of coherent clones of LSCs per eye and circumferential width of coherent clones of LSCs for Pax6+/+ and Pax6+/- corneas at 9 to 28 weeks. In some cases, the SE bars are smaller than the symbols.

 
The experiments were repeated with the Pax6Sey allele,22 on C57BL x CBA and inbred 129/Sv backgrounds. On both backgrounds, at 15 weeks, the Pax6Sey/+ mice had fewer coherent LSC clones than their Pax6+/+ littermates, similar to those for Pax6Sey-Neu/+ 15-week mice (Table 1) .

There was therefore a strong developmental component to the Pax6+/- corneal abnormalities. Fewer LSC clones were activated in Pax6+/- mice. Migration patterns of Pax6+/- corneal epithelial cells were disrupted. The defects were robust across age, genetic background, and the specific null allele of Pax6.

Correction of Corneal Epithelial Thickness and Cell Movement in Chimeras
The disruption of centripetal migration of corneal epithelial cells may be either cell autonomous (a requirement for correct Pax6 dosage in those cells) or nonautonomous (a secondary consequence of a requirement for a normal Pax6 dosage in other cells or tissues). A transcription factor, such as Pax6, may have both cell-autonomous functions (through regulation of genes effecting the differentiation of cells in which it is expressed) and nonautonomous gene functions (e.g., through regulation of expression of secreted molecules that control differentiation of surrounding cells). Chimeras are the classic tool for determining cell autonomy and nonautonomy of gene action. If a gene acts cell autonomously in a particular tissue, in chimeras comprising a mixture of wild-type and mutant cells, only the mutant cells show the mutant phenotypic effect (e.g., they may be absent, depleted in number, or abnormally distributed in that tissue). If the gene does not act cell autonomously, the wild-type cells may rescue the mutant cells so that neither show an abnormal phenotype.34 Comparison of the behavior of Pax6+/- cells in X-inactivation XlacZ mosaics (where all cells are Pax6+/-) and Pax6+/-{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+ chimeras (where only one population of cells is Pax6+/-) provides a test to distinguish between cell autonomous and nonautonomous gene action.

A series of chimeras was made, using a constitutive autosomal LacZ transgene as a marker by which cells from the aggregated embryos could be differentiated. Eight-cell embryos from a Pax6+/+, LacZ-/- line were aggregated to eight-cell embryos from a Pax6+/- x Pax6+/-, LacZ+/+ mating. Twenty-three chimeras were analyzed at postnatal week 15. Nine were Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+/-; 12 were Pax6+/+ {leftrightarrow}Pax6+/-, LacZ+/-; and 2 were Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6-/-, LacZ+/-. Cells derived from the Pax6+/- x Pax6+/-, LacZ+/+ aggregated embryo, irrespective of their Pax6 genotype, were identifiable by X-gal staining. The ratio of GPI1-A to GPI1-B allozymes in nonocular tissues from each chimera was determined (see the Methods section): mean %GPI1-B was taken to be an estimate of the percentage of cells in the chimera that were derived from the Pax6+/- x Pax6+/- eight-cell embryo.

Eyes were dissected and stained with X-gal (Fig. 3) . Thirteen of 16 Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+/- chimeric corneas showed normal radial blue and white stripes. Three corneas had no contribution of LacZ+ cells.



View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Robust directed centripetal migration in Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras. Patterns of X-gal staining in the corneal epithelia of 15-week-old (AC) Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+ chimeras (both aggregated embryos Pax6+/+, one embryo LacZ+) and (DF) Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras (LacZ+ cells are Pax6+/-, LacZ- are Pax6+/+). Scale bar, 1 mm.

 
Blue radial stripes of Pax6+/-, LacZ+/- cells were observed in 19 of 24 Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- corneal epithelia. Five corneas had no LacZ+/- cells. The stripes were identical in character with those found in the Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+/- control corneas, with none of the irregularity or deviation that was characteristic of the Pax6+/-, XlacZ+/- mosaic mice described earlier. The data suggest that normal patterns of corneal epithelial replenishment and cell migration were restored in chimeras. Quantitative analyses were performed to test this, as described later.

Cell-Autonomous Defect in Pax6+/- LSC Function
The contribution of blue and white cells in the peripheral corneal epithelium of each chimeric eye (Bouter) was measured to estimate the proportion of the limbus that was populated by active LacZ+ LSCs. These data are summarized in Table 2 . For each eye, Bouter was compared with the global composition of the chimera, as estimated by mean %GPI1-B. It was reasoned that if the distribution of LacZ+ cells to chimeric corneal epithelia was unbiased and not affected by Pax6 genotype, then Bouter minus %GPI1-B would approximate 0. This was true for Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+ chimeras in which mean Bouter minus %GPI1-B was 6.81 ± 4.35 (n = 16). The contribution of LacZ+ cells to Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- corneas, however, was significantly less than expected: mean Bouter minus the %GPI1-B was -25.46 ± 3.11; n = 24 (t-test comparing control and experimental chimeras: P < 0.0001). A similar underrepresentation was demonstrated by comparing the mean Bouter/%GPI1-B ratios (Table 2) . This underrepresentation of Pax6+/- cells is evidence for an autonomous requirement for correct Pax6 dosage in LSCs during normal replenishment of the corneal epithelium.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Contribution of Blue Cells to Corneal Epithelia of Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+/- Control Chimeras and Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/-, LacZ+/- Heterozygous Chimeras

 
The underrepresentation of Pax6+/- cells in the corneal epithelium of chimeras suggests that Pax6+/- LSCs are autonomously depleted or defective, yet the heterozygous Pax6+/- X-inactivation mosaics had larger coherent LSC clones than wild-type Pax6+/+ mosaics. This apparent paradox could be reconciled if Pax6+/- LSCs are at a competitive disadvantage, compared with wild-type cells, in chimeras, but that this defect does not manifest in XlacZ, Pax6+/- X-inactivation mosaics because all LSCs in these eyes are heterozygous. Pax6+/- eyes may have larger LSC clones than wild-type Pax6+/+ mosaics as a result of expansion of a smaller number of specified LSCs to fill the limbal epithelium and/or reduced cell mixing. The possibility that Pax6+/- LSCs are at a competitive disadvantage in chimeras predicts that coherent clones of Pax6+/- LSCs may be smaller than wild-type clones in Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras. Our analysis of clone size and number produces average values for blue and white clones in each eye. Consequently, any differences between mutant and wild-type cells would be masked, and we cannot test directly whether the mutant clones are smaller. The Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- experimental chimeras had slightly more (smaller) LSC clones per eye (82.92 ± 7.97; n = 19) than the Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+ control chimeras (65.11 ± 7.65; n = 13) of equivalent diameter, but the difference was not significant (t-test: P = 0.09). Thus, although our data suggest that LSC function is controlled autonomously by Pax6 dosage within the LSCs, the data do not yet demonstrate whether Pax6+/- LSC-coherent clones are fewer or smaller than wild-type clones in chimeras.

Corneal Epithelial Function
Epithelial Cell Migration.
Some blue radial stripes failed to reach the center of the cornea (e.g., Fig. 3C ). If there were any autonomous migration defects of Pax6+/- cells, this may manifest as an increased tendency for Pax6+/- LacZ+ blue stripes to become depleted in heterozygous chimeras before reaching the center of the cornea. This possibility was tested. For each chimeric corneal epithelium that contained LacZ+ cells, the proportion of blue cells cut by a centered circle of radius two fifths that of the cornea, %Binner, was calculated as for Bouter. Values of Binner - Bouter and Binner/Bouter were calculated for each eye. Means were calculated for control and heterozygous chimeras. The functions Binner - Bouter and Binner/Bouter did not differ significantly between heterozygous and control chimeras (Table 2) . No quantitative or qualitative autonomous defect in the migratory potential of Pax6+/- corneal epithelial cells was therefore detected. The restoration of normal migration of Pax6+/- cells in Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras is evidence that the migration defect noted in (nonchimeric) heterozygotes is mediated in a nonautonomous manner. This implies that the migration pattern of any individual corneal epithelial cell is controlled, not by Pax6 dosage in that cell, but by Pax6 dosage in surrounding cells or tissues.

Epithelial Thickness.
Chimeric corneas and those of nonchimeric Pax6+/+ and Pax6+/- mice, were sectioned. Nonchimeric Pax6+/- corneal epithelia were thinner, with fewer cell layers (n = 2–4) than wild-type (n = 5–8; Figs. 4A 4B ).4 8 9 The thicknesses (apical-basal depth) of 20 blue stripes from five Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+/- chimeras and 38 blue stripes from 8 Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/-, LacZ+/- chimeric corneas were measured and compared with the immediately adjacent white stripes. In control chimeras, for which both the blue and white stripes were Pax6+/+, blue stripes were slightly thicker than white (mean blue-to-white depth ratio = 1.239 ± 0.025, n = 20; Fig. 4C ). A similar artifactual apical-basal thickening of blue stripes was found for the X-inactivation mosaics (mean blue-to-white depth ratio = 1.27 ± 0.022 [n = 29] from three Pax6+/+ and one Pax6+/- H253 mosaic eye), and implies differential shrinkage of stained LacZ+ and LacZ- epithelia during wax processing.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Pax6+/- epithelial sectors of normal thickness in Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeric corneas. (A, B) Representative histologic sections of the corneal epithelia of adult (15 weeks) Pax6+/+ (A) and Pax6+/- (B) mice from the Pax6Sey-Neu/+ x Pax6Sey/+ crosses that were used to make chimeras. Heterozygotes have thinner corneal epithelia with fewer cell layers. (CE) Sections of the corneal epithelia of a 15-week Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/+, LacZ+ control chimera (C), and Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/-, LacZ+ littermates (D, E). Pax6+/-, LacZ+ cells produced multicellular corneal epithelia of normal thickness in chimeric situations, equivalent to Pax6+/+, LacZ+ cells in the controls. (A, B, E) Hematoxylin/eosin staining; (C, D, E) X-gal staining; (C, D) phase-contrast micrographs. Scale bar, 35 µm.

 
In the Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/-, LacZ+/- chimeric corneas, mean blue-to-white depth ratio was 1.247 ± 0.022 (n = 38), not significantly different from control chimeras (t-test: P = 0.83; Figs. 4D 4E ). The sectors of Pax6+/- cells in the chimeric corneal epithelia were five to seven cells deep, equivalent to wild-type. Thus, both absolute thickness and normal cellular stratification were restored in Pax6+/- sectors of Pax6+/+{leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras. The control of corneal epithelial stratification is poorly understood, but the chimeric data suggest that, as for epithelial migration, the mutant phenotype in Pax6+/- mice is mediated through nonautonomous functions of Pax6 in other cells or tissues.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our results demonstrated that (1) the pattern of clonal growth is disrupted in the developing Pax6+/- corneal epithelium (before activation of LSCs); (2) fewer, larger clones of LSCs are active in Pax6+/- eyes, compared with Pax6+/+; (3) centripetal cell movement in the Pax6+/- corneal epithelium is frequently disrupted; (4) defects in Pax6+/- corneal epithelial thickness and cell movement are nonautonomous and can be corrected in chimeras; (5) Pax6+/- cells are underrepresented in the corneal epithelium of chimeras, and so Pax6+/- LSCs are autonomously depleted or less efficient than wild-type at populating the limbal epithelium.

Development of the Pax6+/- Corneal Epithelium
Pax6 controls the expression of a number of adhesion-related molecules in the cornea and elsewhere and has been identified as a central component of proliferation-differentiation pathways in the developing central nervous system.9 35 36 The mechanistic basis of the disturbance of normal clonal arrangement and growth in Pax6+/- mice has not yet been identified, but the larger clone sizes may reflect defective proliferation-differentiation decisions, or induction of a smaller corneal field in the Pax6+/- mice. One possibility, consistent with known adhesive roles of Pax6, is that cell mixing is reduced in Pax6+/- corneal epithelia compared with Pax6+/+.

LSCs in Pax6+/- Mice
The data presented herein for XlacZ-mosaic mice show that fewer coherent clones of LSCs are present in Pax6+/- animals than in wild-types. If we postulate that a relatively small number of LSCs are specified during development and that clones of these founders expand to fill the limbal niche,21 it is possible therefore that fewer LSCs are specified in the heterozygotes, but Pax6+/- LSCs remain capable of long-term survival and production of functional progeny. Analysis of the contribution of Pax6+/- cells to the corneal epithelia of Pax6+/+ {leftrightarrow}Pax6+/- chimeras showed that Pax6+/- LSCs are nevertheless less efficient than wild-type at populating the limbal epithelium and producing active migrating progeny, demonstrating the power of the chimeras for revealing subtle phenotypic effects. Previous evidence of Pax6+/- LSC deficiency has been circumstantial or correlative—the work presented herein is the first direct demonstration of autonomous LSC deficiency. This will be central to further experiments to elucidate the molecular defects underlying the Pax6+/- LSC phenotype.

Rescue of Pax6+/- Corneal Epithelial Cells in Chimeras
Epithelial cell migration in the Pax6+/- cornea was abnormal. Results from the mosaic mice did not distinguish between a model wherein Pax6+/- cells are autonomously incapable of responding appropriately to signals that guide their migration, or a model in which the cells are capable of responding to signals, but that these signals are disrupted in Pax6+/- eyes. The complete normalization of epithelial thickness and cell migration in the chimeric mice suggests that the latter model—failure of normal guidance cues in Pax6+/- eyes—is likely.

The source of the rescue signals for Pax6+/- cells in the chimeric corneal epithelium is yet to be determined. Pax6+/- cells are eliminated from the embryonic lens of chimeras, and gross corneal opacities, iris hypoplasia, and lens defects do not subsequently occur.33 We suggest that Pax6+/- cells in chimeric corneas are rescued in a nonautonomous manner by (unknown) signals from the wild-type lens. The possibility that they are supported by the surrounding streams of Pax6+/+ epithelial cells or by Pax6+/+ keratocytes cannot be discounted.

It is not known how centripetal migration in the uninjured corneal epithelium is controlled, although several mechanisms of differential proliferation, desquamation, chemotropic guidance, and electrical cues are suggested.17 37 38 39 40 Further work will determine how putative guidance cues may be affected in Pax6+/- eyes and whether they are corrected in the chimeras.

Aniridia-Related Keratopathy
Nishida et al.19 reported that symptoms normally associated with LSC deficiency (absence of palisades of Vogt and incursion of goblet cells into the peripheral cornea) occurred in 16 of 16 patients with aniridia. It was suggested that the early postnatal corneal epithelium (produced before LSC activation) was possibly normal, but that depletion of LSCs resulted in a failure of corneal maintenance later in life.19

Our work has implications for the etiology of ARK and does not suggest that ARK can be explained solely by failure of LSCs. We showed that the developing corneal epithelium is disrupted before LSC activation, and described defects in the migration of corneal epithelial cells. Defects in cell migration may relate to downregulation of adhesion-related molecules such as integrin subunits or ß-catenin in the Pax6+/- corneal epithelium.9 ARK is associated with fragility of the corneal epithelium, perhaps due to downregulation of the Pax6 target, cytokeratin-12.8 9 Because epithelial cells move toward and fill in sites of corneal abrasion,40 it is possible that the disruption of normal cell movement in the Pax6+/- cornea is exacerbated by chronic damage to the epithelium and persistent small-scale diversion of radial migration.


    Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Jean Flockhart for providing technical expertise; Baljean Dhillon, Kanna Ramaesh, and Thaya Ramaesh for helpful discussions; Seong-Seng Tan for the H253 mice; Maureen Ross, Denis Doogan, and Jim Macdonald for specialist assistance; and Sarah McDonald for performing the preliminary analysis of the Pax6-H253 strains.


    Footnotes
 
Supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 065035/Z/01/Z (JDW) and MRC Award G9630132 (JDW).

Submitted for publication October 9, 2003; revised January 5, 2004; accepted January 6, 2004.

Disclosure: J.M. Collinson, None; S.A. Chanas, None; R.E. Hill, None; J.D. West, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: J. Martin Collinson, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK; m.collinson{at}abdn.ac.uk.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Walther C, Gruss P. Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development. 1991;113:1435–1449.[Abstract]
  2. Grindley JC, Davidson DR, Hill RE. The role of Pax-6 in eye and nasal development. Development. 1995;121:1433–1442.[Abstract]
  3. Koroma BM, Yang J-M, Sundin OH. The Pax-6 homeobox gene is expressed throughout the corneal and conjunctival epithelia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;38:108–120.
  4. Baulmann DC, Ohlmann A, Flügel-Koch C, Goswami S, Cvekl A, Tamm ER. Pax6 heterozygous eyes show defects in chamber angle differentiation that are associated with a wide spectrum of other anterior segment abnormalities. Mech Dev. 2002;118:3–17.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Glaser T, Jepeal L, Edwards JG, Young SR, Favor J, Maas RL. PAX6 gene dosage effect in a family with congenital cataracts, aniridia, anophthalmia and central nervous system defects. Nat Genet. 1994;7:463–471.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hanson IM, Fletcher JM, Jordan T, et al. Mutations at the PAX6 locus are found in heterogeneous anterior segment malformations including Peter’s anomaly. Nat Genet. 1994;6:168–173.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Holland EJ, Djalilian AR, Schwartz GS. Management of aniridic keratopathy with keratolimbal allograft: a limbal stem cell transplantation technique. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:125–130.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Ramaesh T, Collinson JM, Ramaesh K, Kaufman MH, West JD, Dhillon B. Corneal abnormalities in Pax6+/- (small eye) mice mimic human aniridia-related keratopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1871–1878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Davis J, Duncan MK, Robison WG, Jr, Piatigorsky J. Requirement for Pax6 in corneal morphogenesis: a role in adhesion. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2157–2167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cotsarelis G, Cheng S-Z, Dong G, Sun T-T, Lavker RM. Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell. 1989;57:201–209.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Chung E-H, Bukusoglu G, Zieske DZ. Localization of corneal epithelial stem cells in the developing rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2199–2206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kinoshita S, Friend J, Thoft RA. Sex chromatin of donor corneal epithelium in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:434–441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Buck RC. Measurement of centripetal migration of normal corneal epithelial cells in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:1296–1297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kruse FE. Stem cells and corneal epithelial regeneration. Eye. 1994;8:170–183.
  15. Beebe DC, Masters BR. Cell lineage and the differentiation of corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1815–1825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lehrer MS, Sun T-T, Lavker RM. Strategies of epithelial repair: modulation of stem cell and transient amplifying cell proliferation. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:2867–2875.[Abstract]
  17. Nagasaki T, Zhao J. Centripetal migration of corneal epithelial cells in the normal adult mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:558–566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Collinson JM, Quinn JC, Hill RE, West JD. The roles of Pax6 in the cornea, retina and olfactory epithelium of the developing mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 2003;255:303–312.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nishida K, Kinoshita S, Ohasi Y, Kuwayama Y, Yamamoto S. Ocular surface abnormalities in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:368–375.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sivak JM, Mohan R, Rinehart WB, Xu PX, Maas RL, Fini ME. Pax-6 expression and activity are induced in the reepithelializing cornea and control activity of the transcriptional promoter for matrix metalloproteinase gelatinase B. Dev Biol. 2000;222:41–54.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Collinson JM, Morris L, Reid AI, et al. Clonal analysis of patterns of growth, stem cell activity and cell movement during the development and maintenance of the murine corneal epithelium. Dev Dyn. 2002;224:432–440.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BLM, et al. Mouse Small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature. 1991;354:522–525.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Quinn JC, West JD, Hill RE. Multiple functions for Pax6 in mouse eye and nasal development. Genes Dev. 1996;10:435–446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Quinn JC, West JD, Kaufman MH. Genetic background effects on dental and other craniofacial abnormalities in homozygous small eye (Pax6Sey/Pax6Sey) mice. Anat Embryol. 1997;196:311–321.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Tan S-S, Williams EA, Tam PPL. X-chromosome inactivation occurs at different times in different tissues of the postimplantation mouse embryo. Nat Genet. 1993;3:170–174.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Collinson JM, Hill RE, West JD. Different roles for Pax6 in the optic vesicle and facial epithelia mediate early morphogenesis of the murine eye. Development. 2000;127:945–956.[Abstract]
  27. West JD. Clonal development of the retinal epithelium in mouse chimaeras and X-inactivation mosaics. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1976;35:445–461.[ISI]
  28. West JD, Hodson BA, Keighren MA. Quantitative and spatial information on the composition of chimaeric fetal mouse eyes from single histological sections. Dev Growth Differ. 1997;39:305–317.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Roach SA. The Theory of Random Clumping. 1968; Methuen London.
  30. Tarkowski AK. Mouse chimaeras developed from fused embryos. Nature. 1961;190:857–860.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Friedrich G, Soriano P. Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. Genes Dev. 1991;5:1513–1523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. West JD, Flockhart JH. Genotypically unbalanced diploid{leftrightarrow}diploid foetal mouse chimaeras: possible relevance to human confined mosaicism. Genet Res. 1994;63:87–99.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Collinson JM, Quinn JC, Buchanan MA, et al. Primary defects in the lens underlie complex anterior segment abnormalities of the Pax6 heterozygous eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:9688–9693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. West JD. Insights into development and genetics from mouse chimeras. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1999;44:21–66.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Estivill-Torrus G, Pearson H, van Heyningen V, Price DJ, Rashbass P. Pax6 is required to regulate the cell cycle and the rate of progression from symmetrical to asymmetrical cell division in mammalian cortical progenitors. Development. 2002;129:455–466.
  36. Simpson TI, Price DJ. Pax6; a pleiotropic player in development. Bioessays. 2002;14:1041–1051.
  37. Maurice DM, Watson PG. The distribution and movement of serum albumin in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 1965;4:355–363.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Bron AJ. Vortex patterns of the corneal epithelium. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1973;93:455–472.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Jones MA, Marfurt CF. Sympathetic stimulation of corneal epithelial proliferation in wounded and non-wounded rat eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2535–2547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Zhao M, Agius-Fernandez A, Forrester JV, McCaig CD. Directed migration of corneal epithelial sheets in physiological electric fields. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2548–2558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Gipson IK, Sugrue SP. Cell biology of the corneal epithelium. Albert DM Jakobiec FA eds. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. 1994;3–16. WB Saunders Philadelphia.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Krulova, K. Pokorna, A. Lencova, J. Fric, A. Zajicova, M. Filipec, J. V. Forrester, and V. Holan
A Rapid Separation of Two Distinct Populations of Mouse Corneal Epithelial Cells with Limbal Stem Cell Characteristics by Centrifugation on Percoll Gradient
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3903 - 3908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. V. Patel and C. N. J. McGhee
In Vivo Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy Confirms that the Human Corneal Sub-basal Nerve Plexus Is a Highly Dynamic Structure
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 3409 - 3412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Li, D. Goldowitz, and D. J. Swanson
The Requirement of Pax6 for Postnatal Eye Development: Evidence from Experimental Mouse Chimeras
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3292 - 3300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Q. Yu and M. I. Rosenblatt
Transgenic Corneal Neurofluorescence in Mice: A New Model for In Vivo Investigation of Nerve Structure and Regeneration
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1535 - 1542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Kucerova, J. Ou, D. Lawson, L. J. Leiper, and J. M. Collinson
Cell Surface Glycoconjugate Abnormalities and Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing in the Pax6+/- Mouse Model of Aniridia-Related Keratopathy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5276 - 5282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. A. Mayes, Y. Hu, Y. Teng, E. Siegel, X. Wu, K. Panda, F. Tan, W.K. A. Yung, and Y.-H. Zhou
PAX6 Suppresses the Invasiveness of Glioblastoma Cells and the Expression of the Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Gene.
Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 9809 - 9817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
S. Kanakubo, T. Nomura, K.-i. Yamamura, J.-i. Miyazaki, M. Tamai, and N. Osumi
Abnormal migration and distribution of neural crest cells in Pax6 heterozygous mutant eye, a model for human eye diseases.
Genes Cells, August 1, 2006; 11(8): 919 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Zhou, X.-m. Li, and R. M. Lavker
Transcriptional Profiling of Enriched Populations of Stem Cells Versus Transient Amplifying Cells: A COMPARISON OF LIMBAL AND CORNEAL EPITHELIAL BASAL CELLS
J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19600 - 19609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. Ouyang, Y.-C. Shen, L.-K. Yeh, W. Li, B. M. Coyle, C.-Y. Liu, and M. E. Fini
Pax6 overexpression suppresses cell proliferation and retards the cell cycle in corneal epithelial cells.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2397 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. Ramaesh, K. Ramaesh, R. Leask, A. Springbett, S. C. Riley, B. Dhillon, and J. D. West
Increased Apoptosis and Abnormal Wound-Healing Responses in the Heterozygous Pax6+/- Mouse Cornea
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 1911 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
Y. Du, M. L. Funderburgh, M. M. Mann, N. SundarRaj, and J. L. Funderburgh
Multipotent Stem Cells in Human Corneal Stroma
Stem Cells, September 1, 2005; 23(9): 1266 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collinson, J. M.