IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:1581-1587.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0245
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Notting, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Pluijm, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Notting, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Pluijm, G.

Whole-Body Bioluminescent Imaging of Human Uveal Melanoma in a New Mouse Model of Local Tumor Growth and Metastasis

Irene C. Notting,1 Jeroen T. Buijs,2 Ivo Que,2 Ratna E. Mintardjo,1 Geertje van der Horst,2 Marcel Karperien,2 Guy S. O. A. Missotten,1 Nicoline E. Schalij-Delfos,1 Jan E. E. Keunen,1 and Gabri van der Pluijm2

1From the Departments of Ophthalmology and 2Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. Human uveal melanoma develops in one of the most capillary-rich tissues of the body and has a pure hematogenous dissemination. Radiodiagnostic examinations, such as ultrasonic diagnostic resonance imaging and chest radiographs plus liver enzyme studies in blood, are methods used to detect liver and other distant metastases in patients. Nevertheless, the mortality rate is high, because of the frequent occurrence of metastases and the lack of systemic therapy. Therefore, the development of novel anticancer strategies is urgent, and more sensitive and less invasive methods of detecting and monitoring in vivo tumor growth and metastatic disease in cancer models are needed.

METHODS. A luciferase (Luc)-positive human uveal melanoma cell line (OCM-1 FRT/luc) was established. Tumor cells were inoculated into the anterior chamber of murine eyes for induction of orthotopic growth or into the left heart ventricle to mimic hematogenous micrometastatic spread. Development of metastases and tumor growth was monitored weekly by whole-body bioluminescent reporter imaging (BLI).

RESULTS. Injection of cancer cells into the anterior chamber of the eye of mice closely mimicked orthotopic tumor growth of uveal melanoma. Tumor progression could be quantitatively monitored 3 weeks after inoculation of 105 OCM-1 FRT/luc cells. Of the mice injected, 83% exhibited a detectable tumor within 5 weeks. Intracardiac injection of tumor cells resulted in metastatic growth, especially in bone. Mice had bone (maxillofacial region and femora) and visceral (lung and mediastinum) metastases after 4 to 6 weeks. OCM-1 FRT/luc cells may also have a propensity to colonize the eye after intracardiac inoculation.

CONCLUSIONS. BLI enables continuous quantitative monitoring in the same animal of growth kinetics for each tumor and its metastases. This model will accelerate the understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of uveal melanoma and metastasis.

Uveal melanoma develops in one of the most capillary-rich tissues of the body and has pure hematogenous dissemination. The mortality rate is high, because of the frequent occurrence of metastases, mainly in the liver (87%), lungs (46%), and bone (29%).1 Early detection is important, because early treatment of the primary tumor and metastases is linked to the patient’s survival.2

Liver and other metastases are early or late events in the evolution of metastasis and can be detected by liver function analysis, ultrasound scan of the liver, or postmortem examination.3 It is important to note that formation of micrometastases is the pathologic basis for the occurrence of clinically overt metastasis. Therefore, therapeutic strategies designed to interfere with initial events in organ colonization and metastasis are needed. Current in vivo models4 5 6 lack the sensitivity that is necessary to detect the initial processes, such as the angiogenic switch,7 essential for tumor progression. Furthermore, disturbed levels of liver enzymes in blood are an indirect measure of tumor burden. More sensitive methods of detecting and monitoring tumor and metastatic growth directly are needed. A commonly used animal model for induction of tumor growth involves orthotopic inoculation of human uveal melanoma cell lines into the anterior chamber of the eye of immunodeficient (nu/nu) mice.4 5 Intracardiac injection of tumor cells in immunodeficient mice can be used as a model of experimental metastasis.8 9

Expression in vivo of reporter genes encoding bioluminescent or fluorescent proteins can be detected externally by sensitive detection systems.10 Cancer cell lines stably transfected either with the firefly luciferase (Luc) or the green fluorescent protein (GFP) have been used to monitor local tumor growth and metastasis in living mice.11 12 13

We investigated the possibility of whole-body bioluminescent reporter imaging (BLI) to visualize in vivo the development of local tumor growth and metastasis after inoculation of luciferase-transfected OCM-1 cells (OCM-1 FRT/luc),4 a human uveal melanoma cell line, into the anterior chamber of the eye (orthotopic site) and to study experimental metastasis in immunodeficient (BALBc nu/nu) mice in vivo.8 14

In this study, BLI allowed sensitive, noninvasive, and quantitative localization and monitoring of orthotopic and metastatic growth of uveal melanoma in vivo.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Female BALBc nu/nu mice were purchased from Charles River (L’Abresle, France). They were housed individually in ventilated cages under sterile conditions according to the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Sterile food and water were provided at libitum. Mice were 8 weeks old at time of intraocular or intracardial injection of tumor cells.

For surgical manipulation, mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride (0.66 mg/kg body weight) and xylazine (0.13 mg/kg body weight) in PBS. Mice were killed by CO2 at the first sign of distress or after a 12-week observation period.

Human Uveal Melanoma Cell Line
OCM-1 cells were obtained from primary uveal melanoma.15 They grew as monolayer in 10 mL/dish Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen-Gibco, Gronningen, The Netherlands) supplemented with 10% FCS (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 100 IU/mL penicillin (Invitrogen-Gibco), and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen-Gibco). Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere and a CO2 content of 5% in air.

Establishment of Stable Transfectants Expressing the Luciferase Reporter Gene
OCM-1 cells were transfected with 1 µg Flp-in construct (Fig. 1 , Invitrogen-Gibco), using a commercial reagent (FuGENE-6) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche Biochemicals, Almere, The Netherlands). For better selection of stable transfectants, the zeocin-resistant gene (original vector) was replaced by a blasticidine-resistant gene (blasticidine, 3.0 µg/mL; Invitrogen-Gibco). Stable blasticidine-resistant cell clones were isolated, subcloned, and tested for the presence of a single FRT cassette by Southern blot analysis. Only those clones containing one Flp construct in the genomic DNA were used. Subsequently, an FRT-positive clone (E11) from OCM-1 was used for the generation of a luciferase-expressing cell line. Cotransfection was performed between the FRT+ tumor clone E11 with the Flp-in expression vector pcDNA5/FRT and the Flp recombinase expression vector pOG44. The gene of interest (GOI) was integrated into the FRT site, by using 1 µg of the construct CMV-luciferase FRT (Fig. 1 , firefly luciferase cDNA) and the transfection reagent (FuGENE-6; Roche Biochemicals).16 Stable transfectants were selected with hygromycin (400 µg/mL, Invitrogen). Subsequently, the OCM-1 E11 FRT/luc was tested for expression of luciferase activity per cell (Fig. 2) . The clone was cultured up to passage 15. Expression of luciferase in OCM-1 FRT/luc cells remained stable over more than 10 passages. This luciferase expression OCM-1 clone was therefore used for in vivo evaluation by BLI.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Psv40 is the promotor, sv40 PA is the stop vector, Amp is ampicillin, and Pcmv is the CMV promoter. (A) Transfection of first construct (Flp-in) with resistance for blasticidine. Stable blasticidine-resistant clones were isolated, subcloned, and tested for the presence of the FRT cassette. (B) Cotransfection was performed between the FRT+ tumor clone E11 with the Flp-in expression vector pcDNA5/FRT and the Flp recombinase expression vector pOG44. The gene of interest (GOI) was integrated into the FRT site with 1 µg of CMV-luciferase FRT construct. (C) The final result of the construct after recombinase by pOG44 with resistance of hygromycin and a transfection reagent (FuGENE-6; Invitrogen). Stable transfectants were selected with hygromycin (400 µg/mL; Invitrogen).

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Luciferase activity of OCM-1 FRT/luc cells correlated in a linear fashion with number of cells (r2 = 1.0). Values are expressed as relative light units (RLU) and number of cells per 0.5 mL.

 
Murine Model of Human Uveal Melanoma in the Anterior Chamber of the Eye
Tumor cells were inoculated into the anterior chamber of mouse eyes (only right eyes, n = 12) as described earlier by Niederkorn.4 With a glass needle, OCM-1/luc cells at a concentration of 105/4 µL were injected into the anterior chamber of the eye of 8-week-old female BALBc nu/nu mice. After 4 to 6 weeks, eyes with large tumors were enucleated17 and used for immunohistochemistry. After 12 weeks, all mice were killed. Mice were imaged with BLI for the first time after 1 week, followed by weekly imaging.

Induction of Metastasis by Intracardiac Injection of Cancer Cells
A single-cell suspension of OCM-1/luc cells (1 x 105/100 µL PBS) was inoculated into the left heart ventricle (n = 7) according to the method described by Arguello et al.,18 with modifications.8 14 Development of metastases was monitored weekly by BLI. During the entire experimental period of intracardiacally inoculated mice, none of the metastases detected by BLI showed a decline in bioluminescent activity. After 12 weeks, all mice were killed, and metastases were dissected for immunochemistry.

Bioluminescent Reporter Imaging
We used an imaging unit (IVIS Imaging System 100; Xenogen Corp., Alameda, CA) that consisted of an intensified 25-mm square, back-thinned, back-illuminated, charge-coupled device camera fitted to a light-tight chamber and equipped with an F0.95/16.5-mm lens. The imaging system is managed by analysis software (Living Image, ver. 2.20; Xenogen Corp.).

For detection of luciferase-expressing cells, mice were anesthetized as described earlier. Thirty microliters of a 250-mM aqueous solution of luciferin8 10 11 12 13 (D-luciferin-Na; Molecular Probes, Leiden, the Netherlands) was injected intraperitoneally before photon recording began. Mice were placed in the light-tight chamber. Photon emission was then integrated for 20 seconds, creating pseudoimages.

The bioluminescent signal was quantified by measuring the amount of highlighted pixels in the area shaped around each site of photon emission with the aid of the software (Living Image ver. 2.20; Xenogen Corp.).

Histochemistry
After enucleation, eyes were immediately fixed in 5 mL of 4% paraformaldehyde (Lommerse Pharma, Oss, The Netherlands). After 24 hours, the eyes were dehydrated for 2 hours in 70% ethanol, 1 hour in 90%, and 30 minutes in 99% and processed for paraffin embedding. Goldner trichrome (to demonstrate the presence and maturation of newly formed bone), hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining were performed on 5-µm serial sections of tumorous eyes and metastases. Bone metastases were selectively excised and fixed overnight in at 4°C. After decalcification in EDTA acid, the sections were processed for paraffin embedding.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
In Vivo Monitoring of Orthotopic Tumor Growth
Of the mice injected with the tumor cells, 83% exhibited a detectable tumor within 5 weeks after intraocular inoculation of OCM-1 FRT/luc cancer cells, as detected by BLI. The first evidence of bioluminescent emission from the orthotopically implanted uveal melanoma cells (OCM-1 FRT/luc) was registered between days 21 and 37 after injection into the anterior chamber of the eye. The light emission in the tumorous eye increased substantially from first appearance until the day of enucleation (Fig. 3) . Quantification of the luciferase signal, localized in the eyes with tumor burden from the time of the first appearance to the time of enucleation, was used for in vivo monitoring of tumor growth (Fig. 3) . Histologic analysis (H&E and Goldner staining) confirmed the presence of cancer cells in the eye to be the site of bioluminescent emission, detected by BLI (Figs. 4 5) . The tumor burden correlated with the bioluminescent signal (Fig. 4) . The total volume of the smallest detectable tumor burden was 0.5 mm3.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. BLI monitoring of OCM-1 FRT/luc cells injected into the anterior chamber of the eye. Bioluminescent photon emission was externally imaged from the lateral projection of the same mouse (A) 37, (B) 44, (C) 51, and (D) 58 days after injection. Signals are displayed as pseudocolor images (blue, least intense; white, most intense). (E) Growth curve obtained by quantification of the bioluminescent signal localized in the right eye in the same mouse. (F) Growth curves obtained by quantification of the bioluminescent signal localized in the right eye in six mice.

 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Tumor burden after injecting tumor cells in the eye correlated in a linear fashion with bioluminescent signal (RLU) of the same eye before enucleation (r2 = 0996). H&E staining of four different eyes at various stages during tumor progression.

 


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Histologic identification of OCM-1 FRT/luc cells in the orthotopic tumor and in distant metastases. H&E, Goldner, and PAS+ staining of sections of tumor growing in the eye (A, B), in the maxillofacial region (C, D), and in a metastasis in a distant location (E). (E, arrows) PAS+ loops. T, tumor; C, cornea; B, bone. Magnification (left, right): (A, C) x4, x40; (B, D, E) x10, x20.

 
In Vivo Monitoring of the Development of Distant Metastases after Intracardiac Injection of Cancer Cells
After intracardiac inoculation of 105 OCM-1 FRT/luc cells, four of seven mice had bone metastases in the maxillofacial region after 4 weeks, detected by BLI (Table 1 , Fig. 6 ). Some mice also had metastatic tumor growth in the hind leg (three of seven), in the eye (two of seven), or in the diaphragm after 4 to 6 weeks (Table 1 , Fig. 6 ). The first luciferase signal of metastasis was registered at day 35 after intracardiac injection of cancer cells. In 57% (n = 7) of the mice, the luciferase signal was localized in the maxillofacial region (Fig. 6) . The intensity of light emission at the metastatic site increased substantially from the first day of appearance until the last day of the experiment. Additional metastatic sites became apparent by BLI at day 42 (Fig. 6) . The quantification of the luciferase signal, localized over the different metastatic sites, allowed continuous monitoring in vivo of the tumor growth for each separate metastatic lesion from the time of appearance until the time of death. Histochemical analysis (H&E, Goldner, and PAS+ staining) confirmed the presence of cancer cells in metastatic lesions at sites of bioluminescent emission.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Overview of the Metastatic Sites after Intracardiac Injection of OCM-1 FRT/luc Cells in Mice

 


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. BLI monitoring of OCM-1 FRT/luc cells injected into the left cardiac ventricle. Bioluminescent photon emission was externally imaged from the frontal projection of the same mouse (B) 36, (C) 43, and (D) 50 days after injection. Growth curve obtained by quantification in the same mice of the different bioluminescent signals localized at several metastatic sites (A).

 
Highly invasive and metastatic uveal melanoma cells are capable of generating PAS-positive loops in vitro.19 We found PAS-positive loops and networks in all metastatic lesions that were induced by OCM-1 FRT/luc cells (Fig. 5) .


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
This investigation presents for the first time intraocular and systemic inoculation with luciferase-positive uveal melanoma cells as a new model for monitoring orthotopic tumor growth and metastatic sites. Injection of OCM-1 FRT/luc cells in the anterior chamber of the eye and the model for induction of experimental metastases of the same cells in nude mice combined with BLI resulted in early detection, continuous monitoring and quantification of tumor growth in vivo.

Several groups have used a model of inoculation with uveal melanoma cells4 5 17 in which histologic staining of tumor sections and liver enzyme tests were used to analyze therapeutic results. These in vivo models, with in vivo/ex vivo methods, have several limitations. First, several groups of animals must be killed at different time points of an experiment to retrieve temporal information. Second, positive blood samples are a late event in metastatic disease. Third, monitoring of tumor growth in the anterior chamber can be difficult when edema develops in the cornea or a tumor starts to grow in the posterior segment of the eye. For these reasons, BLI is time saving and results in generation of more data per experimental series, leading to statistically sound results obtained more rapidly and with the use of fewer animals.11

BLI provides an opportunity to detect a small number of malignant cells rapidly, over the entire body of the mouse. The high sensitivity and specificity for detection of cells in all compartments of an intact animal frequently uncovers biological phenomena such as tumor escape mechanisms and patterns of metastasis.11 This capability enables the study of metastatic and minimal residual disease states in animal models.8 In the present study, BLI of uveal melanoma cells in the anterior chamber of the eye allowed detailed anatomic information, continuous noninvasive sensitive monitoring, and precise quantification of tumor growth in vivo.

Furthermore, micrometastases are difficult to detect because of the lack of clinical signs in mice. Induction of metastasis by intracardiac injection of uveal melanoma cells will provide the opportunity to explore preferential sites for metastasis. According to the literature, the OCM-1 cell line is capable of metastasizing in vivo.4 17 In our study, after intracardiac injection, the OCM-1 FRT/luc cell line induced metastases in the maxillofacial region, the eye, and the hind legs. These findings support the concept that organ specificity of metastasis is not due to differences in blood perfusion, but primarily depends on local interactions between cancer cells and the organ-specific microenvironment.20

This OCM-1 FRT/luc model provides a valuable experimental setting for preclinical evaluation of the in vivo antitumor activity of investigational agents in the same animal over time. Also responses at the different metastatic sites in the same animal can be easily tested.

Many gene-profiling studies have been published in the past years,21 22 reporting different genes that can play an important role in the metastatic potential of uveal melanoma. Another advantage of this model is the opportunity to explore the pathogenic role of these different genes of interest by transfecting the OCM-1 FRT cells.

In conclusion, we have established a new model of intraocular and intracardiac injection of luciferase-reporter–positive transfected cancer cells. Luciferase-positive uveal melanoma cells coupled to BLI detection allowed continuous noninvasive monitoring in vivo of tumor growth and metastasis. This model will facilitate studies of the molecular mechanisms involved in early stages of tumor development and the development of new therapies.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank J. Kan-Mitchell (University of California, San Diego, CA) for providing the OCM1 cell line.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by Grant KWF-RUL 2001-2472 from the Dutch Cancer Society.

Submitted for publication March 3, 2004; revised April 28 and July 6, 2004; accepted July 9, 2004.

Disclosure: I.C. Notting, None; J.T. Buijs, None; I. Que, None; R.E Mintardjo, None; G. van der Horst, None; M. Karperien, None; G.S.O.A. Missotten, None; M.J. Jager, None; N.E. Schalij-Delfos, None; J.E.E. Keunen, None; G. van der Pluijm, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Irene C. Notting, Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; i.c.notting{at}lumc.nl.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kath R, Hayungs J, Bornfeld N, Sauerwein W, Höffken , Seeber S. Prognosis and treatment of disseminated uveal melanoma. Cancer. 1993;72:2219–2223.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Gragoudas ES, Egan KM, Seddon JM, et al. Survival of patients with metastases from uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:383–390.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Kaiserman I, Amer R, Pe’er J. Liver function tests in metastatic uveal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:236–243.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Niederkorn JY. Enucleation in consort with immunologic impair ment promotes metastasis of intraocular melanomas of mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25:1080–1086.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dithmar S, Rusciano D, Grossniklaus HE. A new technique for implantation of tissue culture melanoma cells in a murine model of metastatic ocular melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2002;10:2–8.
  6. Grossniklaus HE, Dithmar S, Albert DM. Animal models of uveal melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2000;10:195–211.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hanahan D, Folkman J. Patterns and emerging mechanisms of angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell. 1996;86:353–364.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Wetterwald A, van der Pluijm G, Que I, et al. Optical imaging of cancer metastasis to bone marrow. Am J Pathol. 2002;3:1143–1153.
  9. Wang CW, Chang YW. A model for osseous metastasis of human breast cancer established by intrafemur injection of MDA-MB-435 cells in nude mice. Anticancer Res. 1997;17:2471–2474.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Contag CH, Contag PR, Mullins JI, Spilman SD, Stevenson DK, Benaron DA. Photonic detection of bacterial pathogens in living hosts. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18:593–603.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Edinger M, Sweeny TJ, Tucker AA, Olomu AB, Negrin RS, Contag CH. Non invasive assessment of tumor cell proliferation in anima models. Neoplasia. 1999;1:303–310.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Zhang W, Puchio AF, Chen K, et al. A transgenic mouse model with a luciferase reporter for studying in vivo transcriptional regulation of the human cyp3a4 gene. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003;31:1054–1064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Edinger M, Hoffmann P, Contag CH, Negrin RS. Evaluation of effector cell fate and function by in vivo bioluminescence imaging. Methods. 2003;31:172–179.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Basse P, Hokland P, Heron I, Hokland M. Fate of tumor cells injected into the left ventricle of heart in Balb/c mice: role of the natural killer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80:657–665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Luyten GP, Naus NC, Mooy CM, et al. Establishment and characterization of primary and metastatic uveal melanoma cell line. Int J Cancer. 1996;66:380–387.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Nordeen SK. Luciferase reporter gene vectors for analysis of promoters and enhancers. Biotechniques. 1988;6:454–458.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Apte RS, Niederkorn JY, Mayhew E, Alizadeh H. Angiostatin produced by certain primary uveal melanoma cell lines impedes the development of liver metastases. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1805–1809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Arguello F, Baggs RB, Frantz CN. A murine model of experimental metastasis to bone and bone marrow. Cancer Res. 1988;48:6876–6881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Maniotis AJ, Folberg R, Hess A, et al. Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:739–752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Fidler IJ. Critical determinants of cancer metastasis: rationale for therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;43:S3–S10.
  21. Zuidervaart W, van der Velden PA, Hurks MH, et al. Gene expression profiling identifies tumour markers potentially playing a role in uveal melanoma development. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1914–1919.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Seftor EA, Meltzer PS, Kirschmann DA, et al. Molecular determinants of human uveal melanoma invasion and metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19:233–246.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
I. Notting, J. Buijs, R. Mintardjo, G. van der Horst, S. Vukicevic, C. Lowik, N. Schalij-Delfos, J. Keunen, and G. van der Pluijm
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 Inhibits Tumor Growth of Human Uveal Melanoma In Vivo
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 4882 - 4889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
J. T. Buijs, N. V. Henriquez, P. G.M. van Overveld, G. van der Horst, I. Que, R. Schwaninger, C. Rentsch, P. ten Dijke, A.-M. Cleton-Jansen, K. Driouch, et al.
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 in the Development and Treatment of Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8742 - 8751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
J.-C. A. Marshall, B. F. Fernandes, S. Di Cesare, S. C. Maloney, P. T. Logan, E. Antecka, and M. N. Burnier Jr
The use of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (Nepafenac) in an ocular and metastatic animal model of uveal melanoma
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 2053 - 2058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. L. Kaijzel, G. van der Pluijm, and C. W.G.M. Lowik
Whole-Body Optical Imaging in Animal Models to Assess Cancer Development and Progression
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3490 - 3497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Notting, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Pluijm, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Notting, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by van der Pluijm, G.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS