IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:2472-2478.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.05-0140
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Niederkorn, J. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Niederkorn, J. Y.

Failure of Acanthamoeba castellanii to Produce Intraocular Infections

Daniel W. Clarke, Hassan Alizadeh, and Jerry Y. Niederkorn

From the Department of Ophthalmology and Microbiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. This study examined possible mechanisms to explain why Acanthamoeba castellanii remains restricted to the cornea and rarely produces intraocular infections. The first hypothesis proposed that trophozoites cannot penetrate Descemet’s membrane and the corneal endothelium to enter the anterior chamber (AC). The second hypothesis proposed that the trophozoites can enter the AC; however, the aqueous humor (AH) contains factors that either induce encystment or kill the amoebae.

METHODS. Descemet’s membrane was isolated from pig corneas and was used to determine whether Acanthamoeba trophozoites could penetrate this membrane in vitro. In addition, the capacity of trophozoites to survive in AH was determined in vitro. Trophozoites (106) were injected into the AC of hamster eyes, and the number of amoebae in the AC was determined by histopathology 1 to 15 days later.

RESULTS. The amoebae penetrated Descemet’s membrane within 24 hours of in vitro culture. Penetration was prevented by addition of serine protease inhibitors or a chicken monoclonal antibody against the Acanthamoeba serine protease MIP-133. Although AH induced encystment of the amoebae, cysts remained viable. Injection of amoebae into the AC induced a robust neutrophil infiltrate, which was associated with complete clearance by day 15 after AC injection.

CONCLUSIONS. The findings suggest that A. castellanii is capable of penetrating Descemet’s membrane and entering the AC. However, a robust neutrophil response is associated with the disappearance of intraocular trophozoites and suggests that cells of the innate immune apparatus are important in preventing Acanthamoeba keratitis from progressing to become an intraocular infection.

Acanthamoeba spp. are ubiquitous free-living protozoa that have been isolated from a variety of habitats, ranging from soil to eyewash stations.1 The life cycle of Acanthamoeba spp. consists of two stages: the motile trophozoite (10–25 µm) and the dormant cyst (8–12 µm). Acanthamoeba spp. most commonly infects the eye to produce Acanthamoeba keratitis, a progressive, sight-threatening corneal infection.2 3 Characteristic symptoms include epithelial ulcers, a ring-like neutrophilic stromal infiltrate, disproportionately severe ocular pain, and resistance to many antimicrobial drugs.1 4 Typical treatment consists of topical applications of propamidine isethionate, polyhexamethylene biguanide, or chlorhexidine, alone or in combination. Even with such therapies, many patients receive therapeutic corneal transplants, which can be reinfected by the activation of dormant cysts in the graft bed.1

The pathogenic cascade of Acanthamoeba keratitis begins when the trophozoites bind to and desquamate the corneal epithelium. Acanthamoeba trophozoites adhere to mannose glycoproteins on the corneal epithelium via the amoeba’s mannose-binding receptor.5 6 7 Exposure of Acanthamoeba trophozoites to mannose has been shown to induce the production of a 133-kDa protein, termed mannose-induced protein (MIP-133), which is highly cytolytic to corneal epithelial cells in vitro.8 9 Acanthamoeba trophozoites penetrate the corneal epithelium and underlying Bowman’s membrane. In addition to killing corneal epithelial cells, Acanthamoeba trophozoites secrete a variety of proteases, including MIP-133, that facilitate invasion of the corneal basement membrane and dissolution of the corneal stroma.10 11 12

Unlike bacterial keratitis, Acanthamoeba keratitis rarely progresses beyond the cornea to produce intraocular infections and endophthalmitis. Only a handful of cases of Acanthamoeba endophthalmitis have been reported in which Acanthamoeba has been shown to be the causative agent of intraocular infection.13 14 15 Furthermore, it is questionable whether these cases of endophthalmitis were due to the natural progression of the trophozoite beyond the corneal endothelium. This study considered the hypothesis that A. castellanii, unlike other ocular pathogens, does not progress and produce intraocular infections. One hypothesis proposed that trophozoites cannot penetrate Descemet’s membrane and the corneal endothelium to enter the anterior chamber (AC). The second hypothesis proposed that the amoebae can enter the AC; however, the aqueous humor (AH) contains factors that either induce encystment or kill the amoebae.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Amoebae and Cell Lines
Acanthamoeba castellanii (ATCC 30868), originally isolated from a human cornea, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Trophozoites were grown as axenic cultures in peptone-yeast-glucose (PYG) medium at 35°C, as described previously.16 17

Human corneal endothelial (HCN) cells were isolated from a corneal explant and immortalized with the human papillomavirus E6 and E7 genes, as described previously.18 HCN cells were cultured in complete Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM; BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) containing 1% L-glutamine (BioWhittaker), 1% penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B (Fungizone; BioWhittaker), 1% sodium pyruvate (BioWhittaker), and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT).

Primary human iris-ciliary body (ICB) cells were harvested from a corneal scleral rim and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; BioWhittaker) containing 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B, 1% sodium pyruvate, and 10% human serum type AB (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Animals
Chinese hamsters were purchased from Cytogen Research and Development, Inc. (West Roxbury, MA) and used at 4 to 6 weeks of age. All corneas were examined before experimentation, to exclude animals with preexisting corneal defects. Animals were handled in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.

Chicken Anti-MIP-133 Antiserum
The specificity of the chicken anti-MIP-133 antiserum (Aveslabs, Tigard, OR) was confirmed through Western blot analysis and ELISA, as described previously.19 Anti-MIP-133 antiserum inhibits cytopathic effects (CPEs) against corneal epithelial cells in vitro and effectively blocks migration through a collagenous matrix (Matrigel; Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA).19

Assay for CPE
The CPE on corneal cells was determined with a previously described photometric assay.8 Briefly, trophozoites (2.5 x 104) were added to 96-well plates, with or without confluent monolayers of HCN or ICB cells and incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. Wells were Giemsa stained (Shandon, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) and the optical density (OD) was read at 590 nm in a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA). The OD of trophozoites alone was subtracted from the OD of experimental wells to determine the OD of live cells.

Migration Assays
Corneas were removed from porcine eyeballs (Owen’s, Dallas, TX) and placed in 5% dispase (Invitrogen-Gibco Corp., Carlsbad, CA) in PBS (pH 7.2) and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Descemet’s membrane was peeled from porcine corneas and placed on a nitrocellulose membrane (13 mm diameter, 3.0 µm pore size; Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) in a Boyden chamber (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA). Acanthamoeba trophozoites (105) were placed in the top chamber in 200 µL PYG and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Acanthamoebae were counted in the bottom chamber with a hemocytometer. Viability was ascertained by trypan blue exclusion. Inhibition assays involved incubating Acanthamoeba trophozoites with the serine protease inhibitors, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline (1,10 P.; Sigma-Aldrich). A cysteine protease inhibitor, cystatin (10 µM cystatin; Sigma-Aldrich), was also used. In similar assays, a 1:100 dilution of chicken anti-MIP-133 antiserum (0.2 mg/mL)19 or a 1:100 dilution of chicken preimmune serum (0.2 mg/mL) was added to trophozoites 30 minutes before their addition to the upper chambers.

To ensure that the protease inhibitors were nontoxic to trophozoites, 106 trophozoites were incubated in 1 mL of PYG with either 1 mM PMSF and 1 mM 1,10-P, a 1:100 dilution of chicken anti-MIP133 antiserum (0.2 mg/mL), or a 1:100 dilution of chicken preimmune serum control (0.2 mg/mL) at 37°C for 24 hours. The number of viable trophozoites was determined by trypan blue exclusion and direct trophozoite counts on a hemocytometer.

To determine whether the protease inhibitors would impede trophozoite motility, trophozoites (105) were incubated in 1 mL of PYG with 1 mM PMSF and 1 mM 1,10-P; a 1:100 dilution of chicken anti-MIP-133 antiserum (0.2 mg/mL); a 1:100 dilution of chicken preimmune serum control (0.2 mg/mL); or 50 µg/mL cytochalasin D at 37°C for 30 minutes before their addition to the upper level of a migration chamber (Transwell; 6.5 mm diameter, 3.0 µm pore size; Corning Costar, Corning, NY). The trophozoites were then placed in the top chamber in 200 µL PYG and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Trophozoites were counted in the bottom chamber by light microscopy (magnification, x100).

Effect of Aqueous Humor on Trophozoites
Trophozoites (106) were incubated in PYG, PBS, or porcine AH, and viability of organisms was determined through trypan blue exclusion at 24 hours, 48 hours, or 7 days.

AH was concentrated 10x using microcentrifugal concentrators with membranes having a molecular mass cutoff of approximately 5 kDa (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Trophozoites (106) were incubated in PYG, AH, 10x AH, or PBS for 7 days. Serial dilutions of the trophozoites, ranging from 105 to 101, were made and placed on a lawn of Escherichia coli on nonnutrient agar as described previously.3 Subsequently, the plates were observed for the presence of Acanthamoeba-produced trails at 24, 48, and 72 hours.

Trophozoites (2.5 x 105/well) were incubated in a 24-well plate in PYG or AH alone or in AH on a confluent monolayer of ICB cells. Because trophozoites kill the monolayer of ICB cells within 48 hours, it was necessary to transfer trophozoites to new wells containing fresh PYG, fresh AH, or fresh AH on a new monolayer of ICB cells at 24, 48, and 72 hours. The contents of each well were suspended in the respective medium, and the viability of cysts and trophozoites was determined at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours by trypan blue exclusion. Trophozoites and cysts were differentiated from ICB cells by morphology.

AC Injections
Trophozoites were injected into the AC of the Chinese hamster eye by using a previously described method for transplanting a precise number of tumor cells into the AC of the mouse eye.20 Briefly, hamsters were deeply anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg of body weight; Fort Dodge Laboratories, Fort Dodge, IA) given intraperitoneally. Trophozoites (106/5 µL of PYG) were inoculated into the AC using a 0.1-mL syringe (Hamilton Co., Reno, NV) fitted with a 35-gauge glass needle. Control experiments involved injecting PYG alone (5 µL) into the AC of the eye. Eyes were examined three times per week for 3 weeks for the appearance of clinical disease.

Histologic Examination
Eyes were removed at 30 minutes and on days 1, 4, and 15 after inoculation of trophozoites into the AC and stored in 10% Carson’s formalin for 24 hours. Specimens were then embedded in paraffin, cut into 4-µm sections with a rotary microtome (Shandon; Thermo Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA) and placed on positively charged glass slides (VWR Scientific, Suwanee, GA). Slides were then bleached overnight in 3% hydrogen peroxide in 1% sodium phosphate-buffered saline. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, coverslipped, and examined by light microscopy.

Statistical Analysis
Student’s unpaired t-test was used to determine statistical significance between experimental and control groups.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Trophozoite-Mediated CPE on HCN Cells In Vitro
Previous studies have shown that trophozoites are capable of killing a variety of target cells in vitro.21 22 23 To ascertain whether A. castellanii rarely progresses beyond the corneal endothelium to produce intraocular infections, it was important first to determine whether trophozoites could either disrupt or kill HCN cells in vitro. A. castellanii trophozoites produced extensive CPEs on HCN cells in vitro, killing approximately 90% of cells within 48 hours, compared with untreated control cells (data not shown).

Trophozoite Penetration of Descemet’s Membrane and the Corneal Endothelium
It is possible that Descemet’s membrane and the corneal endothelium serve as a physical barrier to Acanthamoeba trophozoites, preventing entry of trophozoites into the AC and subsequent intraocular infection. Accordingly, the ability of Acanthamoeba trophozoites to penetrate Descemet’s membrane was examined in vitro. More than one-third of the trophozoites were capable of penetrating Descemet’s membrane and the corneal endothelium within 24 hours of incubation (Fig. 1A) . Serine protease inhibitors, PMSF, and 1,10-P inhibited the penetration of Descemet’s membrane by approximately 75%, whereas the cysteine protease inhibitor cystatin had no significant effect. Previous studies have shown that A. castellanii trophozoites elaborate a 133-kDa serine protease, MIP-133, that is cytolytic against corneal epithelial cells and degrades collagen in vitro.8 Therefore, the ability of anti-MIP-133 antiserum to prevent the penetration of Descemet’s membrane was examined. Anti-MIP-133 antiserum treatment decreased the penetration of Descemet’s membrane by approximately 50%, whereas the preimmune normal serum (NS) control had no significant effect (Fig. 1B) .



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Effect of protease inhibitors and anti-MIP-133 antiserum on trophozoite penetration of Descemet’s membrane in vitro. Acanthamoeba trophozoites (105/200 µL PYG) were placed on Descemet’s membrane in the top chamber of a Boyden chamber and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. (A) Inhibition assays involved incubating trophozoites with serine protease inhibitors (1 mM PMSF+1 mM; 1,10 P) or a cysteine protease inhibitor control (10 µM cystatin) at 37°C for 30 minutes before their addition to the upper chamber. (B) Inhibition assays involved incubating trophozoites with chicken anti-MIP-133 antiserum (0.2 mg/mL; ImS) or chicken preimmune normal serum control (0.2 mg/mL; NS) at 37°C for 30 minutes before their addition to the upper chamber. *P < 0.05.

 
The inhibition of trophozoites by protease inhibitors was not due to adverse effects on trophozoite viability or motility (Fig. 2) . However, cytochalasin D inhibited trophozoite migration through a migration membrane (Transwell; Corning Costar) by 70%, without evidence of toxicity to trophozoites (Fig 2A) .



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Effects of protease inhibitors on trophozoite viability and motility. (A) Effect of serine protease inhibitors and a cytoskeleton inhibitor on trophozoite viability. Acanthamoeba trophozoites (106) were incubated in 1 mL of PYG, (1) alone or with (2) cytochalasin D (50 µg/mL), (3) serine protease inhibitors, (4) anti-MIP-133 antiserum (0.2 mg/mL), or (5) preimmune normal serum control (0.2 mg/mL) at 37°C for 24 hours. The number of viable trophozoites was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Data are the mean ± SE of triplicate counts. The results are not significantly different from the PYG control. (B) Effect of protease inhibitors on trophozoite migration through a migration chamber. Acanthamoeba trophozoites (105/200 µL PYG) were incubated (1) alone or with (2) cytochalasin D control, (3) serine protease inhibitors, (4) cysteine protease inhibitor, (5) anti-MIP-133 antiserum, or (6) preimmune normal serum at 37°C for 30 minutes before their addition to the upper chamber of a two-chamber migration system. A 3.0-µm pore size membrane separated the upper and bottom chambers. After a 24-hour incubation at 37°C, Acanthamoebae were counted in the bottom chamber. Data are the mean ± SE of triplicate counts. **P < 0.01.

 
Effect of Aqueous Humor on Trophozoite Viability
AH contains several factors that are known to be toxic to microorganisms, including complement and immunoglobulin.24 Approximately 37% of trophozoites encysted in AH after 48 hours, whereas only 10% encysted in PYG during the same time frame (Fig. 3) . After 7 days, 100% of trophozoites encysted in AH, PBS, and PYG.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Trophozoite encystment in AH in vitro. Trophozoites (106) were incubated in 1 mL of either PYG (negative control), aqueous humor (AH), or phosphate buffered saline (PBS; positive control for encystment). Trophozoites and cysts were counted at 24 and 48 hours and 7 days, and viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. **P < 0.01.

 
Ten-fold dilutions of cysts were made ranging from 105 to 101 cysts after the 7-day incubation in AH, PBS, or PYG. Each dilution of cysts was plated on a lawn of E. coli on nonnutrient agar to determine cyst viability. By 72 hours, only the dilution containing 10 cysts in the AH group did not produce trails on the lawn of E. coli, indicating that at least 99.999% of the cysts were viable after the 7-day incubation in AH (data not shown). These results were similar to those in the PBS control group. Trophozoites were incubated in 10x AH for 7 days to determine whether AH contains a factor that is toxic to trophozoites when present at higher concentrations. Serial dilutions of cysts were made, ranging from 105 to 101 cysts after the 7-day incubation in 10x AH and plated on lawns of E. coli on nonnutrient agar to assess cyst viability. By 72 hours, as few as 10 cysts produced trails, suggesting that virtually 100% of the cysts were still viable after incubation in 10x AH for 7 days.

Trophozoites in the AC
It is possible that trophozoites can enter the AC; however, the AH that fills this compartment of the eye contains factors that either induce encystment or kill the amoebae in vivo. To determine whether trophozoites can survive in the AH in the AC, 106 trophozoites were injected into the AC, and the eyes were enucleated for histology 30 minutes later and at days 1, 4, and 15 (Fig. 4) . By 30 minutes after inoculation, trophozoites were observed around the iris. By day 1, trophozoites had infiltrated the iris, but had not encysted in the AC. In addition, neutrophils had migrated into the AC and circumscribed the trophozoites. The number of trophozoites in the AC decreased by day 4 after inoculation. By day 15, both trophozoites and inflammatory cells were not detected anywhere in the eye.



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Inflammation and clearance of Acanthamoeba trophozoites injected into the AC of Chinese hamsters. Trophozoites (1 x 106 in 5 µL) were injected into the AC of Chinese hamsters on day 0. Eyes were enucleated and examined after 30 minutes, 1 day, 4 days, and 15 days. (A) Normal Chinese hamster AC and iris (I). (B) AC containing trophozoites within 30 minutes after AC injection. (C) Trophozoites (arrows) localized on the iris surface (I) within 30 minutes after AC injection. (D) Trophozoites and inflammatory cells in the AC within 1 day after AC injection. (E) Neutrophils (arrows) circumscribing trophozoites (T) within 1 day after AC injection. Note the trophozoite (T) nestled in the iris (I). (F) Abundance of inflammatory cells in the AC 4 days after AC injection. (G) Paucity of trophozoites in the AC within 4 days after AC injection. (H) Absence of both trophozoites and inflammatory cells in the AC 15 days after AC injection. (I) Normal iris architecture 15 days after AC injection. Note the absence of inflammatory cells. Control experiments involving the injection of PYG alone (5 µL) into the AC of the eye did not result in inflammation (data not shown). Magnification: (A, B, D, F, H) x100; (C, E, G, I) x600.

 
Effect of AH on Encystment of Trophozoites Incubated with ICB Cells
Trophozoites rapidly encysted when incubated in AH in vitro, yet there was no evidence of encystment of trophozoites after injection into the AC of Chinese hamsters. We believe the encystment induced by AH in vitro is the consequence of nutrient deprivation. The extensive accumulation of trophozoites on the iris and the conspicuous absence of trophozoite encystment suggest that ICB cells may serve as a source of nutrition for trophozoites that enter the AC. Accordingly, the capacity of trophozoites to kill ICB cells was examined in vitro. Within 48 hours of in vitro incubation, trophozoites lysed approximately 80% of the ICB cells compared with the effect on untreated control cells (data not shown).

Additional experiments were performed to determine whether ICB cells could serve as a source of nutrition and offset encystment associated with AH. Trophozoites were incubated in PYG or AH alone or AH on a confluent monolayer of ICB cells, and cultures were examined for evidence of encystment. AH did not induce encystment if trophozoites were incubated on a confluent monolayer of ICB cells (Fig. 5) . By 48 hours, 40% of the trophozoites incubated in AH alone had encysted. By contrast, only 6% of the trophozoites that were incubated in AH on a confluent monolayer of ICB cells encysted. Almost 100% of the trophozoites incubated in AH alone had encysted by 96 hours, whereas only 13% of the trophozoites incubated in AH on a confluent monolayer of ICB cells had encysted. The capacity of ICB cell cultures to prevent AH-induced encystment was comparable to that found with PYG culture medium control and supports the notion that ICB cells prevent encystment by preventing nutrient deprivation.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Effect of AH on encystment of trophozoites incubated with ICB cells. Trophozoites (2.5 x 104) were added to 24-well plates in PYG (negative control) or AH (positive control for encystment) alone or on AH on a confluent monolayer of ICB cells. Trophozoites were transferred to fresh PYG or fresh AH or to fresh AH on a fresh confluent monolayer of ICB cells at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Cysts (A) and trophozoites (B) were counted at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. **P < 0.01.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The purpose of this study was to determine why Acanthamoeba keratitis does not usually progress to produce intraocular infections. Only a few cases of endophthalmitis have been reported in which Acanthamoeba spp. have been implicated in intraocular infections.14 25 26 However, each of these cases of endophthalmitis is questionable. For example, in 2001, a patient who had received four corneal transplants due to Acanthamoeba keratitis presented with intraocular infection.15 It is possible that this case of endophthalmitis was due to the introduction of trophozoites into the eye at the time of corneal transplantation and not the natural progression of the trophozoite beyond the corneal endothelium.

To date, it is not known why Acanthamoeba keratitis rarely progresses beyond the cornea to produce an intraocular infection. One hypothesis proposed that the amoebae could not progress beyond the corneal endothelium and Descemet’s membrane to enter the AC. Because trophozoites were capable of killing human corneal endothelial cells and penetrating Descemet’s membrane in vitro, we conclude that trophozoites can progress beyond the corneal endothelium and Descemet’s membrane to enter the AC. This is not surprising, as Descemet’s membrane contains type IV collagen, which can be degraded by Acanthamoeba MIP-133 protease.19 Because serine protease inhibitors, including anti-MIP-133 antibody, prevent trophozoite penetration of Descemet’s membrane, it is likely that trophozoites use MIP-133 to penetrate this membrane. This correlates with previous findings showing that anti-MIP-133 antiserum prevented trophozoite penetration of a collagenous matrix (Matrigel; Collaborative Biomedical Products), which was used as a model of the corneal basement membrane.19 As the serine protease inhibitors were not toxic at the doses used and did not prevent trophozoite migration, it is likely that the inhibitors were able to prevent the serine proteases involved in the penetration of Descemet’s membrane in vitro, which supports the hypothesis that trophozoites can employ the serine protease MIP-133 to penetrate the cornea and enter the AC.

The second hypothesis proposed that the amoebae can enter the AC; however, the AH contains factors that either induce encystment or kill the amoebae. Our results show that trophozoites encyst in AH in vitro, but are still viable after a 7-day incubation in 10x AH, suggesting that it is unlikely that AH contains a factor that is toxic to trophozoites. We speculate that AH-induced encystment of trophozoites in vitro may be due to nutrient deprivation.

Injection of trophozoites into the AC did not induce their encystment or death. However, the presence of trophozoites in the AC elicited a robust neutrophil infiltrate, which undoubtedly contributed to the elimination of trophozoites. Because trophozoites did not die in the AC and were capable of killing ICB cells in vitro, we hypothesized that trophozoites could feed on the iris cells in vivo. Exposure to AH did not induce encystment if trophozoites were incubated with ICB cells as a source of nutrition in vitro. Thus, it is likely that trophozoites feed on iris cells in vivo, thereby preventing their encystment in the AC.

Previous studies have suggested that the innate immune apparatus is involved in the resolution of Acanthamoeba keratitis in animals.27 28 In fact, recruitment of neutrophils into the cornea through intrastromal injections of recombinant MIP-2, a chemotactic factor for neutrophils, results in transient infiltration of neutrophils followed by a rapid resolution of corneal infection.27 Moreover, neutrophils are capable of killing trophozoites in vitro, and depletion of neutrophils with anti-Chinese hamster neutrophil antibody results in an early onset and more severe infection, compared with untreated hosts.27 29 30 Furthermore, activated macrophages are also capable of killing trophozoites in vitro, and deletion of conjunctival macrophages with the macrophagocidal drug dichloro-methylene diphosphonate (clodronate), results in a chronic, more severe form of Acanthamoeba keratitis.28 31 32

Scleritis has been reported in patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis; however, the scleral inflammation was attributed to an immune-mediated response to necrotic organisms and was not believed to be the result of active infection.33 34 35 This finding is consistent with the present data indicating that intraocular infection is associated with transient inflammation and elimination of trophozoites.

Treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis often involves the use of topical steroids to control the inflammation associated with disease.1 However, dexamethasone treatment increases the incidence, severity, and duration in the Chinese hamster model of Acanthamoeba keratitis, presumably by inhibition of macrophage and neutrophil activation.36 Moreover, dexamethasone induces excystment and proliferation of trophozoites, and also stimulates the Acanthamoeba-mediated cytopathic effect of corneal epithelial cells in vitro.36 Consistent with previous findings, the results of the present study suggest steroidal treatment may increase the corneal load of trophozoites and exacerbate ocular disease.

Although the innate immune apparatus is clearly involved in the resistance to Acanthamoeba infections, the role of the adaptive immune apparatus is not clear. The immune response to corneal infection with Acanthamoeba spp. does not normally elicit delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) or serum IgG antibody against Acanthamoeba antigens.37 38 Furthermore, lymphocytes are sparse in the histopathological specimens of Acanthamoeba keratitis biopsy specimens from patients and experimental animals.4 39 Collectively, these results suggest that T cells fail to inhibit the establishment or progression of Acanthamoeba keratitis.

In summary, our results suggest that Acanthamoeba trophozoites use MIP-133, a serine protease, to penetrate Descemet’s membrane and the corneal endothelium. However, once in the AC, an intense neutrophil infiltrate is evoked with the eventual clearance of intraocular trophozoites, implicating the innate immune apparatus in the resolution of intraocular infection with Acanthamoeba trophozoites. The findings in this study suggest that the innate immune apparatus can circumvent ocular immune-privilege to control an intraocular infection. However, it is unclear why the innate immune apparatus is apparently incapable of resolving Acanthamoeba infections in the human cornea. Future studies are necessary to determine why the innate immune apparatus is effective at eliminating trophozoites from inside the eye, yet ineffective at controlling infection of Acanthamoeba trophozoites at the corneal surface.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Elizabeth Mayhew, Jessamee Mellon, and Sudha Neelam for technical assistance and Clay Beauregard for assistance with the photography.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by National Eye Institute Grant EY09756 and Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.

Submitted for publication February 2, 2005; revised March 9, 2005; accepted March 11, 2005.

Disclosure: D.W. Clarke, None; H. Alizadeh, None; J.Y. Niederkorn, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Jerry Y. Niederkorn, Department of Ophthalmology, U. T. Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9057; jerry.niederkorn{at}utsouthwestern.edu.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Alizadeh H, Niederkorn JY, McCulley JP. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Pepose JS Holland GN Wilhelmus KR eds. Ocular Infection and Immunity. 1996;1062–1071. Mosby St. Louis.
  2. McCulley JP, Alizadeh H, Niederkorn JY. Acanthamoeba keratitis. CLAO J. 1995;21:73–76.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Visvesvara GS, Jones DB, Robinson NM. Isolation, identification, and biological characterization of Acanthamoeba polyphaga from a human eye. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1975;24:784–790.
  4. Mathers W, Stevens G, Jr, Rodrigues M, et al. Immunopathology and electron microscopy of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103:626–635.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Jaison PL, Cao Z, Panjwani N. Binding of Acanthamoeba to [corrected] mannose-glycoproteins of corneal epithelium: effect of injury. Curr Eye Res. 1998;17:770–776.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Morton LD, McLaughlin GL, Whiteley HE. Effects of temperature, amebic strain, and carbohydrates on Acanthamoeba adherence to corneal epithelium in vitro. Infect Immun. 1991;59:3819–3822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yang Z, Cao Z, Panjwani N. Pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba keratitis: carbohydrate-mediated host-parasite interactions. Infect Immun. 1997;65:439–445.[Abstract]
  8. Hurt M, Niederkorn J, Alizadeh H. Effects of mannose on Acanthamoeba castellanii proliferation and cytolytic ability to corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3424–3431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Leher H, Silvany R, Alizadeh H, Huang J, Niederkorn JY. Mannose induces the release of cytopathic factors from Acanthamoeba castellanii. Infect Immun. 1998;66:5–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. He YG, Niederkorn JY, McCulley JP, et al. In vivo and in vitro collagenolytic activity of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:2235–2240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mitra MM, Alizadeh H, Gerard RD, Niederkorn JY. Characterization of a plasminogen activator produced by Acanthamoeba castellanii. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995;73:157–164.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Mitro K, Bhagavathiammai A, Zhou OM, et al. Partial characterization of the proteolytic secretions of Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Exp Parasitol. 1994;78:377–385.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Jones DB, Visvesvara GS, Robinson NM. Acanthamoeba polyphaga keratitis and Acanthamoeba uveitis associated with fatal meningoencephalitis. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1975;95:221–232.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Heffler KF, Eckhardt TJ, Reboli AC, Stieritz D. Acanthamoeba endophthalmitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:584–586.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Moshari A, McLean IW, Dodds MT, Damiano RE, McEvoy PL. Chorioretinitis after keratitis caused by Acanthamoeba: case report and review of the literature. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2232–2236.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. van Klink F, Alizadeh H, He Y, et al. The role of contact lenses, trauma, and Langerhans cells in a Chinese hamster model of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1937–1944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Silvany RE, Dougherty JM, McCulley JP, et al. The effect of currently available contact lens disinfection systems on Acanthamoeba castellanii and Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:286–290.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wilson SE, Weng J, Blair S, He YG, Lloyd S. Expression of E6/E7 or SV40 large T antigen-coding oncogenes in human corneal endothelial cells indicates regulated high-proliferative capacity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:32–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hurt M, Neelam S, Niederkorn J, Alizadeh H. Pathogenic. Acanthamoeba spp secrete a mannose-induced cytolytic protein that correlates with the ability to cause disease. Infect Immun. 2003;71:6243–6255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Niederkorn J, Streilein JW, Shadduck JA. Deviant immune responses to allogeneic tumors injected intracamerally and subcutaneously in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;20:355–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Larkin DF, Berry M, Easty DL. In vitro corneal pathogenicity of Acanthamoeba. Eye. 1991;5:560–568.
  22. Pidherney MS, Alizadeh H, Stewart GL, McCulley JP, Niederkorn JY. In vitro and in vivo tumoricidal properties of a pathogenic/free-living amoeba. Cancer Lett. 1993;72:91–98.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Cursons RT, Brown TJ. Use of cell cultures as an indicator of pathogenicity of free-living amoebae. J Clin Pathol. 1978;31:1–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Forrester J, Dick A, McMenamin P, Lee W. The eye. Basic Sciences In Practice. 1996;316. WB Saunders Company Ltd. London.
  25. Johns KJ, O’Day DM, Feman SS. Chorioretinitis in the contralateral eye of a patient with Acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:635–639.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Burke JP, Webber SK, Kerr-Muir MG, Talbot JF, Parsons MA. Acanthamoeba polyphaga panophthalmitis. Cornea. 1992;11:274–275.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hurt M, Apte S, Leher H, et al. Exacerbation of Acanthamoeba keratitis in animals treated with anti-macrophage inflammatory protein 2 or antineutrophil antibodies. Infect Immun. 2001;69:2988–2995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Stewart GL, Kim I, Shupe K, et al. Chemotactic response of macrophages to Acanthamoeba castellanii antigen and antibody-dependent macrophage-mediated killing of the parasite. J Parasitol. 1992;78:849–855.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Ferrante A, Abell TJ. Conditioned medium from stimulated mononuclear leukocytes augments human neutrophil-mediated killing of a virulent Acanthamoeba sp. Infect Immun. 1986;51:607–617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Stewart GL, Shupe K, Kim I, et al. Antibody-dependent neutrophil-mediated killing of Acanthamoeba castellanii. Int J Parasitol. 1994;24:739–742.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. van Klink F, Taylor WM, Alizadeh H, et al. The role of macrophages in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1271–1281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Marciano-Cabral F, Toney DM. The interaction of Acanthamoeba spp. with activated macrophages and with macrophage cell lines. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1998;45:452–458.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Lee GA, Gray TB, Dart JK, et al. Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis: treatment with systemic immunosuppression. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1178–1182.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Garner A. Pathogenesis of acanthamoebic keratitis: hypothesis based on a histological analysis of 30 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:366–370.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Lindquist TD, Fritsche TR, Grutzmacher RD. Scleral ectasia secondary to Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea. 1990;9:74–76.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. McClellan K, Howard K, Niederkorn JY, Alizadeh H. Effect of steroids on Acanthamoeba cysts and trophozoites. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2885–2893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Alizadeh H, He Y, McCulley JP, et al. Successful immunization against Acanthamoeba keratitis in a pig model. Cornea. 1995;14:180–186.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Van Klink F, Leher H, Jager MJ, et al. Systemic immune response to Acanthamoeba keratitis in the Chinese hamster. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 1997;5:235–244.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Larkin DF, Easty DL. Experimental Acanthamoeba keratitis: II. Immunohistochemical evaluation. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75:421–424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
D. W. Clarke, H. Alizadeh, and J. Y. Niederkorn
Intracorneal Instillation of Latex Beads Induces Macrophage-Dependent Protection against Acanthamoeba Keratitis
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4917 - 4925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Niederkorn, J. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Niederkorn, J. Y.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS