IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2006;47:4199-4210.)
© 2006 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-0176
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaniolo, K.
Right arrow Articles by Guérin, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaniolo, K.
Right arrow Articles by Guérin, S. L.

Expression of the Gene Encoding Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 Is Modulated by Fibronectin during Corneal Wound Healing

Karine Zaniolo,1 Marie-Ève Gingras,1 Marie Audette,1 and Sylvain L. Guérin1,2

1From the Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, and the 2Unit of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec and Laval University, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 is a nuclear enzyme essential in several cellular functions such as DNA repair, DNA transcription, carcinogenesis, and apoptosis. Expression of the PARP-1 gene is mainly dictated by the transcription factor Sp1. Fibronectin (FN), a component from the extracellular matrix transiently expressed at high levels during wound healing of the corneal epithelium, was reported to exert a positive influence on expression of the {alpha}5 integrin subunit gene promoter by altering the state of Sp1 phosphorylation, a process that depended on the activation of the ERK signaling pathway. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether PARP-1 gene expression might be similarly regulated by FN through the same signaling pathways and attempted to link expression of this gene to corneal wound healing in vitro.

METHODS. Expression of PARP-1, Sp1/Sp3, ERK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2, P38 and phospho-P38 was monitored by Western blot in cultures of rabbit corneal epithelial cells (RCECs) grown on FN in the presence of inhibitors of the MAPK, PI3K, and P38 signaling pathways. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were conducted to assess the binding of Sp1 and Sp3 in nuclear extracts from RCECs grown on FN in the presence of inhibitors. Plasmids bearing the PARP-1 promoter fused to the CAT reporter gene were also transfected into RCECs grown under similar culture conditions to assess the influence of these inhibitors on PARP-1 promoter activity.

RESULTS. Expression of PARP-1, Sp1, and Sp3 increased considerably in RCECs grown on FN and translated into increased binding of Sp1 and Sp3 to their DNA target sites. In addition, FN increased PARP-1 promoter activity in a cell-density–dependent manner. Inhibition of both the MAPK and the PI3K pathways entirely abolished these properties.

CONCLUSIONS. PARP-1 gene expression was strongly activated by FN through alterations in the phosphorylation state of Sp1 and Sp3 that resulted from the activation of the MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways, thereby suggesting that PARP-1 may play a critical function during the highly proliferative phase that characterizes wound healing of the corneal epithelium.

The corneal epithelium is a typical stratified squamous epithelium subjected to a large variety of injuries, including mechanical, chemical, and biological traumas.1 2 Corneal wounds account for approximately 37% of all visual disabilities and 23% of medical consultations for ocular problems in North America.3 When wounded, the epithelial cells must mount a rapid healing response to restore all the important barriers of the epithelium. Corneal wound healing depends on essential properties of the epithelial cells such as migration, proliferation, orientation, and adhesion.4 The basal cells from the corneal epithelium adhere to the various components from the extracellular matrix (ECM) through the use of membrane-bound integrin receptors, which link the cell’s cytoskeleton to proteins from the corneal basement membrane such as laminin (LM) and collagen type IV (CIV) (for review see Refs. 5 6 7 8 ). Although absent from the basement membrane of unwounded cornea, staining of fibronectin (FN) dramatically increases within hours after damage to the corneal epithelium, as both the basal cells and stromal keratocytes start producing massive amounts of FN in response to corneal injury.9 10 11 FN secretion is thought to promote migration of corneal epithelial cells by acting as a temporary matrix to which cells attach as they migrate over the wounded area.9 12 13 Surfaces coated with ECM components such as collagen and FN have been shown to promote cell migration in vitro.14 Laminin has also been reported to promote both cell migration and adhesion of epidermal and corneal tissues.15 Consequently, and through the activation of a number of signal-transduction pathways, the ECM is thought to exert profound influences on the major cellular programs of growth, differentiation, and apoptosis by altering the transcription of genes whose specific functions are linked to these cellular functions.

The adhesion and migration properties that characterize the epithelial cells located nearby the injured area are also dictated by the supranormal expression of many structural genes, including those encoding integrins.16 Recently, we demonstrated that the activity directed by the promoter of the {alpha}5 integrin subunit gene was considerably increased in rabbit corneal epithelial cells (RCECs) when grown on FN-coated culture dishes.17 This stimulatory influence of FN was shown to depend on the activation of the MAPK pathway after the binding of FN to its transmembrane receptor, the {alpha}5ß1 integrin. Ligand recognition by the {alpha}5ß1 integrin activates the phosphorylation of downstream effectors of the MAPK pathway such as ERK1 and ERK2. Once activated, these kinases then translocate to the nucleus and in turn phosphorylate several target transcription factors, including Sp1.17 Phosphorylation of Sp1 has been reported to improve its DNA binding properties, thereby resulting in an increased expression of the target genes under its regulatory influence.17 18 Beside the MAPK pathway, binding of FN to the {alpha}5ß1 integrin has also been reported to trigger the activation of both the P38 and PI3K intracellular signaling pathways.19 20 21 22 23 As with activation of the MAPK pathway, ERK1/2 kinases also appear to be downstream targets of the PI3K but not the p38 pathways. Sp1 can therefore become hyperphosphorylated on activation of either pathway (MAPK and PI3K). Sp1 is the founding member of a Zn-finger family of transcription factors, the Sp family, that now comprises nine Sp genes (Sp1 to Sp9) (reviewed in Ref. 24 ). Because it is ubiquitously expressed and its GC-rich target site is found in a large number of eukaryotic genes, Sp1 is believed to control and regulate the expression of many thousands genes in the human genome, several of which encoding proteins required for cell maintenance and survival functions such as proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, and apoptosis. A role for Sp1 in corneal wound healing has been postulated, as this transcription factor regulates the expression of many integrin subunit genes at the transcriptional level (which comprises integrin subunits {alpha}2,25 {alpha}6,26 {alpha}11,27 the leukocyte integrin subunits CD11c28 and CD11d,29 ß2/CD18,30 {alpha}IIb,31 32 {alpha}v,33 ß5,34 and ß3,35 as well as the {alpha}5 FN-binding integrin subunit.17 36 37 In addition, actively growing, undifferentiated primary cultured cells that are typically found in healing tissues, were recently reported to express high levels of Sp1, whereas quiescent or fully differentiated cells did not.38

Beside integrin genes, Sp1 is also believed to regulate the expression of most, if not all, housekeeping genes. One such candidate is the gene encoding poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1. PARP-1 is a nuclear enzyme that is involved, by posttranslational modification of various proteins, in several important cellular functions, including DNA damage signaling, DNA repair, DNA transcription, carcinogenesis, and apoptosis (for review, see Ref. 39 ). The transcriptional activity directed by this housekeeping gene promoter is deeply regulated by the transcription factors Sp1/Sp3.40 41 As for Sp1, PARP-1 expression and activity appear to be modulated by cell density and differentiation during corneal wound healing.38 Besides, PARP-1 is often found in active regions of chromatin, most likely because of its role in poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of histones (for a review see Ref. 42 ). PARP-1 expression has been postulated to play a protective function during the proliferative phase that characterizes corneal wound healing.38 Through its action on histone proteins, PARP may also facilitate expression of genes whose products are required for cell adhesion and migration of the leading edge by promoting unwinding of active chromatin. Furthermore, PARP-1 has been recently shown to regulate the expression of the integrin CD11a through direct interaction with NF-{kappa}B,43 establishing a role for PARP-1 in cell migration during neuronal injury. As cell migration is a major prerequisite for wound healing, it is likely that PARP-1 gene expression will be differently modulated during this process.

In this study, we examined whether expression of PARP-1 might be under the regulatory influence of the ECM components FN, LM, and CIV in RCECs to establish a putative function for PARP-1 in corneal wound healing. Inhibitors of the MAPK, PI3K, and p38 signal transduction pathways were used to decipher which of these routes are activated by the ECM. Our data indicate that only FN could increase the activity directed by the rPARP-1 promoter in an integrin-specific and a cell-density–dependent manner. This regulatory influence of FN is mediated by either the MAPK or PI3K pathways as both PD98059 and wortmannin, but not SB203580, could prevent activation of ERK1/2 and thereby alter the phosphorylation state of Sp1 and its regulatory influence on the rPARP-1 promoter activity. The coordinated expression of FN, Sp1, and PARP-1 in highly migrating and proliferative RCECs suggests that PARP-1 must play a critical role during the proliferative burst that characterizes wound healing of the corneal epithelium.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All experiments described in this article were conducted in voluntary compliance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and all procedures were approved by the Laval University Animal Care and Use Committee.

Cell Culture and Media
RCECs were obtained from the central area of freshly dissected rabbit cornea as described previously44 and then grown to subconfluence (near 80% coverage of the culture plates) under 5% CO2 in supplemented hormonal epithelial medium (SHEM) with 5% FBS and 20 µg/mL gentamicin. When indicated, human FN, murine laminin type I (LM), or human collagen type IV (CIV; all from Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada), was coated on the culture dishes at varying concentrations (FN, 5 µg/cm2; LM, 2 µg/cm2; CIV, 3 µg/cm2), as described previously.17 Inhibition of the intracellular signaling pathways was performed by culturing subconfluent RCECs in the presence of 20 µM of the MEK/kinase inhibitor PD98059 (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Pickering, ON, Canada), 0.1 µM of the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin (Sigma-Aldrich), or 10 µM of the P38 inhibitor SB203580 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 48 hours before the cells were harvested.

Plasmids and Oligonucleotides
The rPARP-1 recombinant plasmids PCR3 and PCR3/F2F3F4m have been described elsewhere41 The PXGH5 plasmid, which bears a secreted version of the human growth hormone gene upstream of the mMT-I promoter, was the kind gift of David D. Moore (Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). The plasmid pCMV-Flag-P38(AGF) 45 which encodes high levels of a dominant negative form of p38 was kindly donated by Roger J. Davis (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA). The double-stranded oligonucleotides bearing the high-affinity binding site for either Sp1 (5'-GATCATATCTGCGGGGCGGGGCAGACACAG-3')46 or NF-I (5'-GATCTTATTTTGGATTGAAGCCAATATGAG-3')47 were chemically synthesized (Biosearch 8700; Millipore, Bedford, MA).

Transient Transfections and CAT Assays
RCECs were grown either on plastic or on tissue culture plates coated with FN, LM, or CIV at various densities (from 5 x 103–1 x 105 cells/cm2) or at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2, as specified in the figure legends, and transfected 24 hours later (48 hours when cells were grown on the ECM), by using a polycationic detergent (Lipofectamine; Invitrogen-Gibco, Burlington, ON, Canada), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. When indicated, inhibitors of the intracellular signaling pathways were added 3 hours after transfection. For the antibody blocking experiment, RCECs were incubated on ice for 20 minutes with increasing concentrations (0–500 ng) of a {alpha}5 integrin-specific, blocking monoclonal antibody (CD49e; BD Biosciences-PharMingen, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Cells were then grown for 48 hours before transfection on tissue culture plates single-coated with BSA, FN (5 µg/cm2), or CIV (3 µg/cm2), or on plates double-coated with FN and CIV. Each transfected plate received 1 µg of the PCR-CAT test plasmids and 1 µg pXGH5.48 Levels of CAT activity for all transfected cells were determined as described49 and normalized to both the amount of human growth hormone (hGH) secreted into the culture media (and assayed by using a kit for quantitative measurement of hGH (Immunocorp, Montréal, QB, Canada) and the amount of nuclear proteins from the extract used. Each single value was expressed as 100 x (% CAT in 4 hours)/100 µg protein/ng hGH. The value presented for each plasmid transfected corresponds to the mean of at least three separate transfections done in triplicate.

Nuclear Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays
Crude nuclear extracts were prepared as described50 from RCECs grown either on BSA- or FN-coated, 175 cm2 culture flasks, and with or without addition of inhibitors of the cell-signaling pathways and dialyzed against DNaseI buffer (50 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 20 mM K3PO4 [pH 7.4]), 1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, and 20% glycerol). The protein concentration from each of the nuclear extracts was determined by the Bradford procedure and precisely validated through Coomassie blue staining on SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The calibration was performed as follows: Once the gel was stained with Coomassie blue, a protein band with a high apparent molecular mass was selected and its intensity determined through densitometric analysis (BioImage, visage 110; Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI) for all the extracts used. The concentration of each extract was then precisely adjusted and a sample from each extract loaded once again on a second gel and further stained with Coomassie blue to ensure uniformity among the various extracts prepared. Extracts were then kept frozen in small aliquots at –80°C until use.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed by incubating 4 x 104-cpm-labeled probe consisting of the Sp1 oligonucleotide 5' end labeled with 32P, with 5 µg nuclear proteins in the presence of 25 ng of poly(dI-dC) (Pharmacia-LKB; Thermo Electron Corp., Waltham, MA) in buffer D (5 mM HEPES, 10% glycerol, 0,05mM EDTA and 0125 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]). Incubation proceeded at room temperature for 5 minutes, and DNA-protein complexes further separated by gel electrophoresis through a 10% native polyacrylamide gel run against Tris-glycine buffer as described.51 Gels were dried and autoradiographed at –80°C. Competition experiments in EMSA were conducted as above, except that a 500-fold molar excess of either the Sp1 or NF-I unlabeled oligonucleotide was added to the reaction mixture as a competitor. Supershift experiments in EMSA were also conducted as just described, except that 3 µL of a polyclonal antibody directed against either Sp1 or NF-I (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was added to the proteins before addition of the probe.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot
Either 20 µg nuclear extracts (PARP, Sp1, and Sp3 blots) or 85 µg total proteins (Erk1/2 and P38 blots) were added to 1 volume of sample buffer (6 M urea, 63 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 1% SDS, 0.00125% (wt/vol) bromphenol blue, and 300 mM ß-mercaptoethanol) and then size-fractionated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide minigel before being transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter, blotted as described 37 and then exposed to (1) rabbit polyclonal antibodies (all Abs used at 1:5000 dilution) raised against Sp1, Sp3, NF-I (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), total ERK1/2 or phospho ERK1/2 (Calbiochem-Cedarlane, Hornby, ON, Canada), total P38 (Cedarlane) or phospho-P38 (Cell Signaling Technology) or (2) a monoclonal antibody raised against bovine PARP52 (C-2-10 Ab bought from Guy Poirier, Unit of Health and Environment, CHUL Research Center, Québec, Canada; 1:10 000 dilution). After incubation for 1 hour at RT in a 1:1000 dilution of a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (PARP) or a 1:5000 dilution of a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory-Bio/Can Scientific, Mississauga, ON, Canada), immunoreactive complexes were revealed with a Western blot detection kit (GE Healthcare, Baie d’Urfé, QB, Canada), and autoradiographed. When indicated, densitometric analyses (BioImage, visage 110; Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI) were performed to quantify the signal corresponding to Sp1 in Western blot. Each Western blot result shown in this study corresponds to one of at least three representative experiments.

Statistical Analyses
Data are presented as the mean ± SE. Student’s t-test was used to assess the influence of ECM components (FN, CIV, and LM) versus BSA on the activity directed by the rPARP-1 promoter.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Modulation of the rPARP-1 Promoter Activity by FN
Primary culturing of RCECs at both post- or midconfluence by plating them sparsely on the culture plate and thereby activating their proliferative and migrating properties proved to be a useful and reliable model of wound healing.17 37 38 53 Because expression of the PARP-1 gene is both positively regulated by Sp1 and modulated by cell density in primary cultured cells,38 we hypothesized that as is the case with the {alpha}5 integrin subunit gene,17 its expression might considerably differ when cells are grown in the presence of FN. A recombinant construct bearing the basal promoter from the rPARP-1 gene comprising three target sites for Sp1 (F2, F3, and F4 in plasmid PCR3; Fig. 1A ) fused to the CAT reporter gene or its mutated derivative that bear mutations in each of the three Sp1 sites (in PCR3/F2F3F4m; Fig. 1A ) were transfected into RCECs plated at various cell densities, either on BSA- or FN-coated culture plates. As shown on Figure 1B , FN had no influence on rPARP-1 promoter function when RCECs are plated at a low cell density (5 x 103 and 1.5 x 104 cells/cm2). However, CAT activity increased by approximately threefold when cells are plated at 2.5 x 104 cells/cm2 and reached its highest activation level (a near 10-fold increase) at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2. The stimulatory influence of FN was totally lost as cell density was increased further to 4.5 x 104 cells/cm2. Of note, the positive influence of FN began turning into a negative regulatory influence at 6.5 x 104 cells/cm2 and reached an impressive 20-fold repression at 1 x 105 cells/cm2.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Influence of cell density on the FN responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter. (A) Schematic representation of the constructs transfected. The position of three Sp1 sites (F2, F3, and F441 ) is indicated along the +13/–101 segment from the rPARP-1 promoter in PCR3. Arrow: position of the mRNA start site. Mutations of the F2, F3, and F4 Sp1 sites in the PCR3 F2/F3/F4m plasmid are indicated by an X. (B) PCR3 and PCR3 F2/F3/F4m were transfected into RCECs seeded at various concentrations (5 x 103–1 x 105 cells/cm2) on FN-coated culture wells. Cells were harvested 48 hours after transfection and CAT activities determined. Data are expressed as the ratio of the CAT activity in RCECs grown with FN over that obtained in cells grown on BSA. *CAT activities from transfected RCECs grown on FN that are significantly different from those measured at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2 (P < 0.005; Student’s t-test).

 
The Sp1/NF-I Ratio in RCECs Grown on FN
Transcription directed by the rPARP-1 promoter rely on both the positive regulatory influence of Sp1 and the negative regulatory action of the transcription factor NF-I, which competes with Sp1 binding as both transcription factors possess overlapping target sites in the rPARP-1 promoter.54 55 As shown on Figure 2A (left-side), incubation of nuclear extracts from subconfluent RCECs with a 5' end-labeled oligonucleotide bearing the high-affinity binding site for Sp1 yielded two DNA–protein complexes with formations found to be specific as the unlabeled Sp1 oligomer, but not a similar oligonucleotide bearing the target sequence for NF-I competed successfully with both. Supershift experiments in EMSA conducted through the further addition of antibodies directed against either Sp1 or Sp3 to the reaction mixture showed that the slow-migrating, more intense complex contains both Sp1 and Sp3 whereas the weaker, faster-migrating complex contained only Sp3. The addition of both the Sp1 and Sp3 antibodies (Sp1/Sp3Ab; Fig. 2A ) entirely prevented the formation of both complexes in EMSA. Similar experiments conducted using the NF-I target site as the labeled probe revealed the formation of a diffuse signal in EMSA that is typical of NF-I binding to DNA (Fig. 2A , right-side). Its formation was found to be specific as its binding was successfully blocked by the NF-I but not by the unrelated Sp1 unlabeled oligomer. Furthermore, addition of a polyclonal antibody that recognizes any of the NF-I isoforms supershifted almost entirely the NF-I-DNA complex in EMSA. Therefore, RCECs express both SP1/SP3 and NF-I at subconfluence.


Figure 2
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Expression of Sp1/Sp3 and NF-I was differentially regulated by cell density. (A) Crude nuclear extracts from RCECs grown to subconfluence were incubated with end-labeled oligonucleotides bearing binding sites for the transcription factors Sp1/Sp3 (left) or NF-I (right), alone (C) or in the presence of a 500-fold molar excess of unlabeled Sp1 (Sp1 500x) or NF-I (NFI 500x) oligomers used as competitors. When indicated, antibodies against Sp1 (Sp1 Ab), Sp3 (Sp3 Ab), or NF-I (NFI Ab) were added, alone or in combination (Sp1/Sp3 Ab) with the reaction mixture before gel loading. DNA–protein complexes were then examined by EMSA. The position of the Sp1, Sp3, and NF-I complexes is shown, along with that of the supershifted complexes (SSC) and the free probe (U). (B) Nuclear extracts were prepared from RCECs seeded either on BSA or on FN-coated flasks at either 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2 (for subconfluent cultures) or 1 x 105 cells/cm2 (for postconfluent cultures). Cells were allowed to grow until they reached 80% confluence (SC) or maintained at postconfluence for 5 days (PC5d) before they were harvested for the preparation of nuclear extracts. Nuclear proteins were then incubated with either the (left) Sp1- or (right) NF-I-labeled probe, and the formation of DNA–protein complexes was monitored by EMSA, as detailed in (A). (C) The level of both Sp1 and NF-I was monitored by Western blot experiments conducted on the extracts used in (B) with either the Sp1 or NF-I antibodies described in (A). The position of the nearest molecular mass markers (120-, 60-, and 40-kDa) is provided.

 
We then examined whether any quantitative alteration in the level of both Sp1 and NF-I may account for the opposite regulatory actions of FN on sub- (strong activation) and postconfluent (strong repression) RCECs. As shown in Figure 2B , FN considerably increased the DNA binding properties of both Sp1 and NF-I at subconfluence, with an Sp1/NF-I ratio (2.82 ± 0.5) that favored the positive action of Sp1, as evaluated through the phosphorescence imager quantification of the labeled DNA–protein complexes on the EMSA. As cells progressed toward quiescence at 5-days after confluence, DNA binding corresponding to both transcription factors dramatically diminished in the absence of FN. This result is consistent with our previous observations that Sp1 is degraded, most likely by the proteasome, when cells are maintained for such a period after confluence.37 Maintaining RCECs at 5-days after confluence in the presence of FN restored binding of both transcription factors. However, the FN influence on NF-I binding was beyond that observed for Sp1 at postconfluence, and therefore considerably altered the Sp1/NF-I ratio (which declined to 0.46 ± 0.5). Although culturing RCECs on FN at subconfluence indeed increased the absolute amount of Sp1 (184% ± 48%), which appears as three discrete protein bands in Western blot (Fig. 2C) corresponding to various posttranslationally modified forms of Sp1 (phosphorylated or glycosylated Sp1), yet this increase did not reach that observed in the EMSA (527% ± 69%) indicating that additional posttranslational modifications likely alter the affinity with which Sp1 binds to its target sites in DNA. This is even more dramatic for NF-I, whose absolute amount of protein decreased on growing cells on FN at subconfluence (Fig. 2C) , whereas its DNA binding ability increased considerably (Fig. 2B) .

{alpha}5ß1 Integrin Dependency of the PARP-1 Promoter FN Responsiveness
To demonstrate that the FN responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter was dependent on the signal transduction cascade activated by the binding of FN to the {alpha}5ß1 integrin, an antibody-directed receptor interference assay was conducted. RCECs were first incubated with increasing concentrations of a blocking anti-{alpha}5 Ab and then seeded in wells single-coated with either BSA or FN (5 µg/cm2), or double-coated with both FN (5 µg/cm2) and CIV (3 µg/cm2). The addition of CIV was required as adhesion of RCECs to FN is almost exclusively dependent on {alpha}5ß1 and that blocking this integrin with the CD49e Ab totally prevents their adhesion to FN (data not shown). As RCECs express the {alpha}2ß1 and {alpha}3ß1 integrin receptors for collagen,56 57 58 cell adhesion could be maintained on CIV, even in the presence of the {alpha}5 blocking Ab. As shown in Figure 3 , a 10-fold increase in rPARP-1 promoter function was observed in RCECs cultured on FN. The further addition of CIV did not change the FN-mediated increase in rPARP-1 promoter activity. However, exposing the cells to 50 ng of the CD49e Ab was sufficient to reduce FN responsiveness by 71%, whereas 500 ng totally prevented its positive influence on the rPARP-1 promoter. Monoclonal antibodies raised against either the {alpha}1 or the ß5 integrin subunits, neither being expressed at the cell surface of corneal epithelial cells,56 57 58 were totally inefficient in preventing the FN-mediated responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter (Fig. 3) .


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Antibody inhibition of the FN-mediated responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter. RCECs were exposed to various concentrations (5-, 50-, and 500 ng) of a blocking Ab directed against the {alpha}5 integrin subunit (CD49a) before they were seeded on culture wells coated with BSA or FN alone or both FN and CIV (FN+CIV). Cells were then transfected at subconfluence with PCR3. As the negative control, monoclonal antibodies (500 ng) against the {alpha}1 or the ß5 integrin subunits were added to the cells before their seeding on coated culture plates. Data are expressed as the ratio of CAT activity in cells grown in the presence of FN over that in cells grown on BSA. *CAT activities in transfected cells cultured in the presence of the {alpha}5 Ab that are significantly different from those cultured with no added antibody (P < 0.005; Student’s t-test).

 
Influence of CIV and LM on rPARP-1 Promoter Activity
Basal corneal epithelial cells normally rest on a basement membrane essentially made out of CIV and LM that contains very little FN, which is produced only when the corneal surface is damaged. We therefore examined whether both CIV and LM may alter the activity directed by the rPARP-1 promoter when coated on the culture wells before seeding of RCECs. FN considerably improved proliferation of RCECs within the first 48 hours (cells grown on FN covered approximately 80% of the culture well, whereas RCECs grown on BSA covered approximately 60% when seeded at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2) whereas LM dramatically reduced it (Fig. 4A) . Cells grown on FN spread very rapidly within the first few hours, whereas those grown on BSA required 24 hours to spread out completely. A significant proportion of the cells had not spread yet after 48 hours when plated on LM. These growth characteristics were maintained at 5 days after seeding. RCECs had a less differentiated phenotype with much smaller cells when grown on FN than on BSA. Although all cells attached and spread on LM 5 days after plating, they covered only 40% to 50% of the culture well. No growth alteration was observed with CIV, either 2 or 5 days after seeding (Fig. 4A) .


Figure 4
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Influence of LM and CIV on rPARP-1 promoter function. (A) Phase-contrast images of RCECs grown at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2 on BSA or on FN, LM, and CIV for 2 days (2d; transfection day) and 5 days (5d; harvest day). Magnification, x200. (B) RCECs seeded at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2 on culture wells coated with BSA, FN, LM, or CIV were transfected with PCR3 or PCR3 F2/F3/F4m. Cells were harvested and CAT activities determined as in Figure 1 . Data are expressed as the ratio of the CAT activity in cells grown in the presence of the ECM components over that in cells grown on BSA. *CAT activities from transfected cells cultured in the presence of ECM components that are significantly different from those cultured on BSA (P < 0.005; Student’s t-test).

 
We then transfected both PCR3 and PCR3/F2F3F4m into subconfluent RCECs seeded at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2 on culture wells coated with BSA or with FN, LM, or CIV. Again, FN strongly increased PCR3 activity (~14-fold), whereas neither LM nor CIV had any influence on the basal rPARP-1 promoter activity when coated individually (Fig. 4B) . Combining FN with CIV (FN+CIV) or with both CIV and LM (FN+CIV+LM), did not significantly alter the FN responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter. On the other hand, the positive influence FN exerted was entirely lost when similar experiments were conducted using the Sp1-mutated construct PCR3/F2F3F4m.

Cell-Signaling Pathways Activated by FN
Although the basal PARP-1 gene promoter shares many characteristics across different species (mouse, rat, and human), it remained to be established whether FN would similarly affect expression of the endogenous PARP-1 gene expressed by RCECs. Growing RCECs on FN (5 µg/cm2) considerably increased the expression of endogenous PARP-1, as revealed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 5) . Increased expression of PARP-1 on FN correlated with a dramatic increase in Sp1 expression and in a moderate increase in the expression of Sp3.


Figure 5
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Western blot analyses of proteins from RCECs grown on FN. Total cell extracts were prepared from subconfluent RCECs cultured on plates coated either with BSA or FN and examined in Western blot (75 µg for PARP-1, Sp1, P38, and P-P38; 20 µg for Erk1/2 and P-Erk1/2), with monoclonal antibodies directed against PARP-1, total ERK1/2 (ERK1/2), phosphorylated ERK1/2 (P-ERK1/2), total P38 (P38), and phosphorylated P38 (P-P38) or polyclonal antibodies against Sp1 and Sp3. The position of the 120- and 40-kDa proteins used as molecular mass markers is indicated.

 
To decipher which of the MAPK, P38, and PI3K pathways account for the increase in PARP-1 expression resulting from the binding of FN to {alpha}5ß1, total ERK1/2 and P38, as well as their phosphorylated, activated counterparts, were examined by Western blot in the same extracts as just described. No alteration in total ERK1/2 was observed when RCECs are grown on BSA or FN-coated culture plates (Fig. 5) . In addition, very little phosphorylated, activated ERK1/2 are detectable when cells are grown on BSA. However, the level of phosphorylated ERK1/2 (and most particularly ERK2, which possesses the lowest electrophoretic mobility on gel) increased dramatically when RCECs were grown on FN. No change was observed between cells grown on BSA or on FN for both inactivated and phosphorylated P38 (Fig. 5) .

RCECs were then cultured at subconfluence on FN-coated culture plates either alone or in the presence of inhibitors (20 mM each) of the MAPK, PI3K, and P38 intracellular-signaling pathways. The MEK-kinase inhibitor PD98059 has been shown to be a very potent inhibitor of the MAPK pathway,17 59 whereas both wortmannin and SB203580 are currently used to inhibit the PI3K60 and P3861 pathways, respectively. Total cell extracts were prepared and analyzed in Western blot experiments. As shown in Figure 6 , expression of endogenous PARP-1 was considerably reduced in cells cultured on FN-coated plates in the presence of either PD98059 or wortmannin but not SB203580 (three- and fourfold reduction in cells grown with PD98059 and wortmannin, respectively, as revealed through densitometric analyses). Expression of both Sp1 and Sp3 was similarly reduced in RCECs grown with PD98059 or wortmannin (4.0- and 5.5-fold reduction of Sp1 in cells grown with PD98059 and wortmannin, respectively), but not SB203580. Total ERK1/2 was unaffected by any of the inhibitors but phosphorylated ERK2 almost totally disappeared when cultured cells were grown with either PD98059 or wortmannin but not with SB203580. None of the three inhibitors had any influence on the level of both inactivated and phosphorylated P38.


Figure 6
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. Western blot and EMSA analyses of proteins from RCECs grown on FN, with or without inhibitors of the signaling pathways. (A) RCECs were grown on FN-coated plates, alone (FN) or in the presence of PD98059 (FN+PD), wortmannin (FN+W) or SB203580 (FN+SB). Total cell (for PARP-1, Sp1, and Sp3) or nuclear extracts (for ERK1/2, P-ERK1/2, P38 and P-P38) were then prepared and examined by Western blot with the antibodies from Figure 5 . Data from one of four similar experiments are presented. (B) Crude nuclear proteins from RCECs grown on FN alone (lane 3) or in the presence of PD98059 (PD; lane 4), wortmannin (W; lane 5), or SB203580 (SB; lane 6) were incubated with an Sp1-labeled probe, and the formation of DNA-protein complexes was examined by EMSA. Nuclear proteins from RCECs grown on BSA were also used as the negative control (lane 2, BSA). The position of both the Sp1 and Sp3 complexes is shown, along with that of the free probe (U). P, labeled probe without nuclear proteins (lane 1).

 
We then conducted EMSA experiments on the total cell extracts just described, to confirm whether the changes in the Sp1 protein level also translate into corresponding alterations in its DNA binding properties. Consistent with the results shown in Figure 2A , growing RCECs on FN-coated plates increased the DNA binding ability of Sp1 toward its target site (Fig. 6B ; compare lanes 2 and 3). However, FN responsiveness was totally lost when cells were grown with either PD98059 (lane 4) or wortmannin (lane 6), as the Sp1/labeled probe signal returned to that observed when RCECs are grown on BSA (lane 2). Again, SB203580 had no influence at all on the FN-induced level of Sp1 binding.

The functional significance of inhibiting the FN/{alpha}5ß1-mediated signal transduction pathways on PARP-1 promoter activity was then assessed by transfecting PCR3 and PCR3/F2F3F4m into subconfluent RCECs plated either on BSA or FN-coated culture plates, and grown with PD98059, wortmannin, or SB203580. Again, PCR3 responded very nicely to the presence of FN on the culture plates (Fig. 7A) whereas FN responsiveness was totally abrogated when all three Sp1 sites were mutated in PCR3/F2F3F4m. As expected, both PD98059 and wortmannin severely and totally impaired FN responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter, respectively, but had no influence when PCR3 was replaced with PCR3/F2F3F4m. In an unexpected result, SB203580 totally blocked the FN responsiveness of the PCR3 construct. However, it also dramatically reduced the basal level directed by PCR3/F2F3F4m (14-fold reduction), even though all three Sp1 sites were mutated. To investigate further this Sp1-independent inhibition of the P38 signaling pathway by SB203580, both pCR3 and pCR3F2/F3/F4m were cotransfected into RCECs grown on BSA- or FN-coated plates, along with a recombinant construct (pCMV-Flag-P38(AGF)) that encode high levels of expression of a dominant negative form of P38 (P38AGF). As with SB203580, overexpression of P38AGF entirely suppressed FN responsiveness directed by wild-type pCR3 and also considerably repressed (10-fold) the activity directed by the Sp1-mutated derivative pCR3F2/F3/F4m (Fig. 7B) .


Figure 7
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7. rPARP-1 promoter activity in RCECs grown on FN with or without inhibitors of the signal transduction pathways. (A) The recombinant plasmids PCR3 and PCR3 F2/F3/F4m were transfected into RCECs grown to subconfluence on BSA- or FN-coated culture wells, either alone (BSA; FN) or in the presence of PD98059 (FN+PD), wortmannin (FN+W), or SB203580 (FN+SB). CAT activities were measured and expressed as in Figure 1 . *CAT activities from transfected cells cultured on FN in the presence of the inhibitors that are significantly different from those cultured on FN without exposure to the inhibitors (P < 0.005; Student’s t-test). (B) PCR3 and PCR3 F2/F3/F4m were transfected into RCECs grown to subconfluence on BSA- or FN-coated culture wells, alone (BSA; FN) or with a recombinant construct encoding a dominant negative version of P38 (FN+P38AGF). As a control, PCR3 or PCR3 F2/F3/F4m transfected, were also transfected in RCECs grown on FN and in the presence of SB203580. *CAT activities from transfected cells cultured on FN in the presence of the inhibitor or P38AGF that are significantly different from those cultured solely on FN (P < 0.005; Student’s t-test).

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
When the corneal epithelium is injured, local changes in the basement membrane, mostly characterized by the massive, transitory secretion of FN, occur within the first few hours after the damage.12 62 This newly synthesized FN-enriched basement membrane has been postulated to serve as a temporary matrix for the attachment and migration of the basal epithelial cells that border the injured area,63 a process dictated in part by the interaction of FN with its corresponding membrane-bound integrin receptors. Engagement of integrins with their corresponding ligands then triggers the activation of a variety of signal-transduction pathways that alter the pattern of genes expressed by the epithelial cells bordering the damaged area of the cornea. In this study, we provided evidence that PARP-1 belongs to those genes with expression that is altered by FN in highly proliferative RCECs. The FN responsiveness of PARP-1 gene expression was shown to rely on dramatic changes in the affinity with which the transcription factor Sp1 binds to its target sites in the PARP-1 basal promoter. This Sp1-dependent increase in PARP-1 promoter activity was shown to result from the activation of either the MAPK or the PI3K pathway in response to the engagement of the {alpha}5ß1 integrin receptor by FN.

FN responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter was found to be cell-density–dependent, peaking at 3.5 x 104 cells/cm2, a seeding density that corresponded to ~80% coverage of the culture plate at the moment the cells were transfected. Such a cell coverage of the culture surface also correlated perfectly with the density at which both endogenous PARP-1 and Sp1 reached their best possible level of expression (as revealed by Western blot analyses) and DNA binding properties (as revealed by EMSAs for Sp1).38 Expression of Sp1 was shown to disappear very rapidly, often to nondetectable levels in certain types of cells, as primary cultured cells reached growth arrest at postconfluence in the absence of FN.38 64 However, maintaining RCECs at postconfluence in the presence of FN restored, although to a lower level, the expression of Sp1 in these cells. Yet, rPARP-1 promoter activity failed to be properly activated as its transcription became negatively regulated by FN at a high cell density. This reversion of the positive influence of FN into a negative influence when RCECs are plated at a high density (1 x 106 cells per 35-mm well) could have resulted from the posttranslational modification, probably phosphorylation, of transcription factors other than Sp1 that are also necessary to maintain proper rPARP-1 promoter function. One such candidate transcription factor might as well belong to the NF-I family.65 Indeed, the activity directed by the rPARP-1 promoter has been recently shown to be negatively regulated by NF-I.54 55 Although NF-I appears to be transcriptionally inert by itself as it possesses no intrinsic activity in the regulation of this gene system, its negative influence results from the fact that it competes with Sp1 for the availability of a promoter composite element that bears overlapping target sites for both these transcription factors.55 This particular type of overlapping arrangement for both the Sp1 and NF-I target sites in which NF-I negatively influences gene expression by preventing Sp1 from interacting with its binding site is not unique to the rPARP-1 promoter as has also been reported for both the collagen alpha1(I)66 and the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A genes.67 An interesting observation was that, whereas the DNA binding of Sp1 (and to a lower extend, its expression too) decreased in postconfluent cells grown in the presence of FN, that of NF-I increased considerably. Consequently, the Sp1/NF-I ratio of activities, which clearly favored the positive action of Sp1 at subconfluence (1.82 ± 0.5), switched toward NF-I interference at postconfluence (0.46 ± 0.5). Yet, the possibility remains that transcription factors other than NF-I might account for the repression of the rPARP-1 promoter observed when cells are maintained at a high cell density.

The various growth properties observed when RCECs are plated on the different ECM components (increased spreading and proliferation on FN and reduced spreading and proliferation on LM) somehow agree with their suspected function during corneal wound healing. Indeed, FN, whose staining is absent in the basement membrane of normal corneas, becomes massively expressed and secreted within hours after damage to the corneal epithelium,12 62 which precisely coincide with the activation of both the migration and proliferation properties of the basal cells from the corneal epithelium. At approximately the same time that cell proliferation and migration are not required anymore, FN expression and secretion are turned off, whereas that of LM is turned on, as the basement membrane of healing corneas stains strongly for this ECM component 48 hours after corneal injury.12 These clinical findings suggest that FN may promote cell migration and proliferation in response to tissue injury, whereas LM would signal exactly the opposite, by restricting both these properties and forcing the cells to differentiate or progress into growth arrest. Of note, although FN is strictly reported to increase both cell migration and proliferation, LM is often associated with growth arrest of both normal and cancer cells. Studies by Arita et al.68 and Clarke et al.69 provided evidence that LM suppresses cell growth by increasing the expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p21/WAF-1. This LM-mediated growth arrest appears to rely on the cytoplasmic domain of the ß4 integrin subunit from the LM-binding integrin {alpha}6ß4, which has been shown to be linked to a signaling pathway that induces expression of p21. Besides p21, laminin-5 has also been reported to be coexpressed with the tumor suppressor p16 in epidermal keratinocytes at the migrating front of healing wounds, thereby causing growth arrest of migratory keratinocytes that lead to wound reepithelialization.70

Binding of ECM components with their corresponding integrin receptors triggers the activation of intracellular signaling mediators, such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK); the MAPKs Erk1/2, JNKs, and p38; and Rho family GTPases, such as RhoA, Rac1, and CDC42 (for reviews, see Refs. 71 72 ). Activated FAK will, in turn, activate Erk1/2 kinases through the Ras/Raf-1/MEK/MAPK (Erk) pathway. However, Erk1/2 can also become activated through the activation of PKC/Raf-1 by PI3K.60 73 Activation of Erk1 and Erk2 through phosphorylation causes their translocation to the nucleus, where they have been reported to phosphorylate and activate several transcription factors, such as LSF, ETS1, ELK, c-Jun, c-Myc, and PEA3,74 75 76 77 78 79 as well as Sp1.80 81 82 Our pharmacological inhibition studies indicate that binding of FN to its integrin receptor {alpha}5ß1 increases PARP-1 gene expression in migrating and highly proliferative subconfluent RCECs, a model that compares favorably to corneal wound healing, by activating Erk1/2 through the MAPK or the PI3K, but not the P38, pathway. This finding is consistent with the increased DNA-binding properties of Sp1, a recognized downstream target of Erk1/2, observed when RCECs were grown on FN, and with the corresponding increase in PARP-1 expression, whose transcription has been reported to be primarily dependent on the positive influence of both Sp1 and Sp3 in vitro.38 41 Of interest, and in agreement with our results, scratch-wound–induced migration of human endothelial cells in a sheer stress model, a process shown to depend strictly on the interaction of the {alpha}5ß1 integrin with FN, was shown to rely on activation of both the MAPK ERK 1/2 and PI3K.83 PI3K has been reported as necessary for integrin-stimulated activation of the MAPK cascade and the serine/threoinine kinase Akt.60 The PI3K/Akt pathway triggers a cascade of responses involved in cell survival, proliferation, and growth (reviewed in Refs. 84 85 ). Although both ERK1 and ERK2 are well recognized as the major downstream effectors of the MAPK pathway, those from Akt are just beginning to be identified. They include the proapoptotic protein BAD,86 glycogen synthetase kinase-3ß (GSK-3ß,87 the newly identified target protein NAG-1 (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene87 ), as well as transcription factors such as NF{kappa}B, and Forkhead (reviewed in Ref. 85 ). At the present time, we have no evidence as to whether Akt becomes activated as a consequence of the {alpha}5ß1 integrin occupancy by FN in primary cultured RCECs.

Rather surprisingly, bypassing P38 signalization through either the overexpression of a dominant negative form of P38 or the pharmacological inhibition of P38 abolished FN responsiveness of the rPARP-1 promoter irrespective of whether the Sp1 sites were mutated (Fig. 7) . These results suggest that FN may have triggered the activation of P38 (although we did not see it in the experiments shown in Figs. 5 and 6A ) and thereby altered a transcription factor other than Sp1 that is normally involved in the regulation (possibly negatively) of basal rPARP-1 promoter function. Although such a negative action would be well suited for NF-I, its phosphorylation has been shown to improve its DNA binding rather than to decrease it. NF-I has been reported to interact directly with a component from the p300/CBP coactivator complex—an interaction abrogating the NF-I-C-mediated repression of the MMTV promoter.88 Recently, p300/CBP was identified as a target of activated P38, with its phosphorylation preceding its degradation by the proteasome.89 It is then conceivable that the NF-I proteins sequestered into the p300/CBP complexes would also be subjected to degradation by the proteasome on activation of P38, being thus unavailable to regulate the expression of their target genes. Binding of NF-I to the PARP-1 promoter would then be reduced on activation of P38 and would translate into an increase in PARP-1 expression. This would be consistent with a functional requirement for PARP-1 in pathologic stresses that are induced by radical oxygen species, hypoxia, and proinflammatory cytokines as they mediate their influence through activation of the P38 signaling pathway.90 Hypoxia and oxygen species are known inducers of PARP-1 activity, as they both damage DNA (reviewed in Ref. 91 ).

Much evidence points toward a major function for PARP-1 in tissue damage.92 Tissue insults lead to DNA damage, which can arise from the formation of nitric-oxide derivatives such as peroxynitrite.92 As a consequence, PARP-1 becomes overactivated and may lead to an important depletion in its substrate NAD+. In response to the NAD+ depletion, the cell’s attempt to resynthesize this substrate leads to a depletion of ATP and triggers the cell to die from energy loss. This process allows for the elimination of cells that are too damaged to progress through the many steps of the wounding process. Indeed, anterior stromal keratocytes undergo apoptosis in response to corneal epithelial injury in a proportion that may range from 0.9% to 5.1%, depending on the surgical procedure selected.93 However, unlike stromal keratocytes, corneal epithelial cells have been reported to be resistant to apoptosis, as only a small proportion of the cells lost from the surface of the cornea through shedding enter apoptosis.94 Growth factors, such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), have been shown to confer cytoprotection on corneal epithelial cells by preventing them from progressing into apoptosis through the activation of the PI3K/Akt-1/Bad- but not the ERK1/2-mediated signal transduction pathways.95 Of note, studies by Hoyt et al.96 97 provided evidence that engagement of ß1 integrins can prevent acute DNA breakage caused by a variety of unrelated agents, such as the antitumor agent bleomycin, by dramatically reducing poly(ADPR) synthesis by PARP-1 in response to DNA damage. Integrin clustering has been proposed to alter the chromatin structure by a PARP-modulated nuclear response.98 As FN increased PARP-1 expression in RCECs without any apparent alteration in its activation status (data not shown), it is expected that no depletion in NAD+ or ATP occurred under such culture condition. Then, what physiological advantage would such an increase in PARP-1 protein confer to RCECs during wound healing? One possible way by which PARP-1 may contribute to wound healing without the need for the cell to progress toward apoptosis is through alteration of transcription factors that regulate genes whose encoded products are necessary for cell adhesion and migration. Gene disruption or pharmacological inactivation of PARP-1 has been reported to reduce the cytokine-mediated expression of ICAM-1, P-selectin, and E-selectin, as well as mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule (MAdCAM)-1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells.99 PARP-1 has been reported to modulate the expression of the integrin CD11a in the migration of microglial cells after brain injury.100 PARP-1 may do so either by directly interacting with transcription factors, as shown for YY-1, AP-2, B-MYB, Oct-1, TEF-1, and NF-{kappa}B, or through their poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, as evidenced for p53, fos, NF-{kappa}B, and both RNA polymerases I and II (reviewed in Ref. 101 ). Although PARP-1 has been most often reported to interfere with the positive regulatory influences mediated by these transcriptions factors, some evidence suggests that it may also act as a coactivator or enhancer factor and thereby promote gene transcription.102 103 Target sites for some of these transcription factors (AP-1, AP-2, B-MYB, and NF-{kappa}B) were identified in many integrins genes’ promoters. Both AP-1 and -2 are of particular interest, as binding sites for these transcription factors have been identified in the promoter of the {alpha}4, {alpha}5, and {alpha}6 integrin gene subunits26 104 105 ; and the expression of these transcription factors has been reported to be increased during corneal wound healing.37 106 107 The transcription factor PAX-6, necessary for proper development of many eye structures including the cornea, the lens, and the retina, is also worth mentioning, as its expression has been demonstrated to be under the influence of PARP-1.108 Pax-6 expression is increased at the migrating edge as the epithelium resurfaces the cornea after injury109 and may contribute to corneal wound healing by modulating the expression of Pax-6 responsive genes, which comprise those encoding the integrin subunits ß1, {alpha}4, and {alpha}5.106 110 111 It is interesting that activation of the Sp1 DNA-binding activity by TNF-{alpha} or LPS requires PARP-1 activity, as Sp1 activation has been found to be lower in PARP-1–/– glial cells relative to the level measured in PARP-1+/+ glia112 However, as yet no clear evidence that PARP-1 may either directly interact with Sp1 or use it as a substrate for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation has been reported.

In conclusion, wound healing of the corneal epithelium is obviously a process with effectiveness that is dependent on the intracellular signals transduced by the binding of membrane-bound integrins to components from the ECM such as FN. PARP-1 may turn out to be a major component of the wound-healing response by being overexpressed during the proliferative burst that characterizes this process, although the precise mechanism through which this is accomplished remains elusive.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Steeve Leclerc for technical assistance and Serge Desnoyers, MD (Department of Pediatrics, CHUL Research Center, CHUQ and Laval University, Québec, Canada), for critically reviewing this manuscript.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Grant #37946 and the Vision Network of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ). KZ and MEG received FRSQ and CIHR Studentships, respectively. MA and SLG are FRSQ Scholars.

Submitted for publication February 17, 2006; revised June 6, 2006; accepted August 23, 2006.

Disclosure: K. Zaniolo, None; M.-E. Gingras, None; M. Audette, None; S.L. Guérin, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Sylvain L. Guérin, Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, CHUL, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Ste-Foy, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada; sylvain.guerin{at}crchul.ulaval.ca.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Latvala T, Paallysaho T, Tervo K, Tervo T. Distribution of alpha 6 and beta 4 integrins following epithelial abrasion in the rabbit cornea. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74:21–25.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Gipson IK, Inatomi T. Extracellular matrix and growth factors in corneal wound healing. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995;6:3–10.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Germain L, Carrier P, Auger FA, Salesse C, Guerin SL. Can we produce a human corneal equivalent by tissue engineering?. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:497–527.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Dua HS, Gomes JA, Singh A. Corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:401–408.[Free Full Text]
  5. Humphries MJ, Obara M, Olden K, Yamada KM. Role of fibronectin in adhesion, migration, and metastasis. Cancer Invest. 1989;7:373–393.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hynes RO. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell. 1992;69:11–25.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Ruoslahti E, Pierschbacher MD. New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science. 1987;238:491–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ruoslahti E. Fibronectin and its receptors. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:375–413.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Nakamura M, Sato N, Chikama T, Hasegawa Y, Nishida T. Fibronectin facilitates corneal epithelial wound healing in diabetic rats. Exp Eye Res. 1997;64:355–359.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Espaillat A, Lee SJ, Arrunategui-Correa V, et al. Expression of fibronectin isoforms in rat cornea after an epithelial-scrape wound. Curr Eye Res. 1994;13:325–330.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Fujikawa LS, Foster CS, Harrist TJ, Lanigan JM, Colvin RB. Fibronectin in healing rabbit corneal wounds. Lab Invest. 1981;45:120–129.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Murakami J, Nishida T, Otori T. Coordinated appearance of beta 1 integrins and fibronectin during corneal wound healing. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;120:86–93.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Suda T, Nishida T, Ohashi Y, Nakagawa S, Manabe R. Fibronectin appears at the site of corneal stromal wound in rabbits. Curr Eye Res. 1981;1:553–556.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Nakagawa S, Nishida T, Kodama Y, Itoi M. Spreading of cultured corneal epithelial cells on fibronectin and other extracellular matrices. Cornea. 1990;9:125–130.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Qin P, Kurpakus MA. The role of laminin-5 in TGF alpha/EGF-mediated corneal epithelial cell motility. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66:569–579.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Lu L, Reinach PS, Kao WW. Corneal epithelial wound healing. Exp Biol Med (Maywood).. 2001;226:653–664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Larouche K, Leclerc S, Salesse C, Guerin SL. Expression of the alpha 5 integrin subunit gene promoter is positively regulated by the extracellular matrix component fibronectin through the transcription factor Sp1 in corneal epithelial cells in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:39182–39192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Chu S, Ferro TJ. Sp1: regulation of gene expression by phosphorylation. Gene. 2005;348:1–11.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Wilson SH, Ljubimov AV, Morla AO, et al. Fibronectin fragments promote human retinal endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation and ERK activation through alpha5beta1 integrin and PI 3-kinase. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1704–1715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Gorrini C, Loreni F, Gandin V, et al. Fibronectin controls cap-dependent translation through beta1 integrin and eukaryotic initiation factors 4 and 2 coordinated pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9200–9205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Thant AA, Nawa A, Kikkawa F, et al. Fibronectin activates matrix metalloproteinase-9 secretion via the MEK1-MAPK and the PI3K-Akt pathways in ovarian cancer cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2000;18:423–428.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Sudhakar A, Sugimoto H, Yang C, Lively J, Zeisberg M, Kalluri R. Human tumstatin and human endostatin exhibit distinct antiangiogenic activities mediated by alpha v beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:4766–4771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Forsyth CB, Pulai J, Loeser RF. Fibronectin fragments and blocking antibodies to alpha2beta1 and alpha5beta1 integrins stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and increase collagenase 3 (matrix metalloproteinase 13) production by human articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2368–2376.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Zhao C, Meng A. Sp1-like transcription factors are regulators of embryonic development in vertebrates. Dev Growth Differ. 2005;47:201–211.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Zutter MM, Ryan EE, Painter AD. Binding of phosphorylated Sp1 protein to tandem Sp1 binding sites regulates alpha2 integrin gene core promoter activity. Blood. 1997;90:678–689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lin CS, Chen Y, Huynh T, Kramer R. Identification of the human alpha6 integrin gene promoter. DNA Cell Biol. 1997;16:929–937.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Lu N, Heuchel R, Barczyk M, Zhang WM, Gullberg D. Tandem Sp1/Sp3 sites together with an Ets-1 site cooperate to mediate alpha11 integrin chain expression in mesenchymal cells. Matrix Biol. 2006;25:118–129.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Shelley CS, Teodoridis JM, Park H, Farokhzad OC, Bottinger EP, Arnaout MA. During differentiation of the monocytic cell line U937, Pur alpha mediates induction of the CD11c beta 2 integrin gene promoter. J Immunol. 2002;168:3887–3893.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Noti JD, Reinemann BC, Petrus MN. Sp1 binds two sites in the CD11c promoter in vivo specifically in myeloid cells and cooperates with AP1 to activate transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:2940–2950.[Abstract]
  30. Rosmarin AG, Luo M, Caprio DG, Shang J, Simkevich CP. Sp1 cooperates with the ets transcription factor, GABP, to activate the CD18 (beta2 leukocyte integrin) promoter. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13097–13103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Block KL, Shou Y, Thorton M, Poncz M. The regulated expression of a TATA-less, platelet-specific gene, alphaIIb. Stem Cells. 1996;14(suppl 1)38–47.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Shou Y, Baron S, Poncz M. An Sp1-binding silencer element is a critical negative regulator of the megakaryocyte-specific alphaIIb gene. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:5716–5726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Czyz M, Cierniewski CS. Selective Sp1 and Sp3 binding is crucial for activity of the integrin alphaV promoter in cultured endothelial cells. Eur J Biochem. 1999;265:638–644.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Feng X, Teitelbaum SL, Quiroz ME, et al. Sp1/Sp3 and PU. 1 differentially regulate beta(5) integrin gene expression in macrophages and osteoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:8331–8340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Jin Y, Wilhide CC, Dang C, et al. Human integrin beta3 gene expression: evidence for a megakaryocytic cell-specific cis-acting element. Blood. 1998;92:2777–2790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Birkenmeier TM, McQuillan JJ, Boedeker ED, Argraves WS, Ruoslahti E, Dean DC. The alpha 5 beta 1 fibronectin receptor: characterization of the alpha 5 gene promoter. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:20544–20549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Gingras ME, Larouche K, Larouche N, Leclerc S, Salesse C, Guerin SL. Regulation of the integrin subunit alpha5 gene promoter by the transcription factors Sp1/Sp3 is influenced by the cell density in rabbit corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3742–3755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zaniolo K, Rufiange A, Leclerc S, Desnoyers S, Guerin SL. Regulation of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 gene expression by the transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 is under the influence of cell density in primary cultured cells. Biochem J. 2005;389:423