IOVS Drug Metabolism and Disposition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48:63-67.)
© 2007 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.05-1203
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meuer, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meuer, S. M.

Association of Retinal Vessel Caliber to Optic Disc and Cup Diameters

Kristine E. Lee, Barbara Eden Kobrin Klein, Ronald Klein, and Stacy M. Meuer

From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School Madison, Wisconsin.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. To investigate whether optic disc size is related to retinal venule and arteriole diameters.

METHODS. The population of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, aged 43 to 86 years were invited to participate in a baseline examination from 1988 to 1990. During this examination, photographs, centered on the optic discs, were taken after pupil dilation. Optic discs and cups were measured from stereoscopic photographs, whereas retinal vessel measurements were taken from a single digitized photograph. Central retinal vein and central retinal arterial equivalents were subsequently calculated. Data for 3887 right eyes are included in the analyses.

RESULTS. Narrower retinal venules and arterioles were found in the smaller optic discs controlling for optic cup diameter as well as age, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, refraction, and sex. Central retinal artery equivalents ranged from 156.04 ± 16.82 µm in the smallest optic disc category to 165.93 ± 15.17 µm in the larger disc category (P < 0.001). Central retinal vein equivalents ranged from 228.93 ± 21.26 µm in the smallest to 243.18 ± 22.32 µm in the larger disc categories (P < 0.001). The significant reduction in retinal vessel diameters was only apparent for the smallest optic disc sizes. A reduction in retinal vessel diameters was less consistent and not significant for small optic cup sizes.

CONCLUSIONS. Smallest optic discs were associated with smaller central retinal artery and central retinal vein diameters. This anatomic relationship may be useful as an additional associated indicator for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy as well as for retinal vascular events.

Small optic discs and cups have been suggested to be associated with increased risk for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.1 The mechanism proposed for the association is that the small discs and cups result from a small scleral canal,1 2 leading to crowding at the lamina cribrosa.2 3 4 It has been suggested that even mild ischemia3 4 5 6 7 and swelling of the optic nerve5 further compresses vessels at the disc, leading to further ischemia, swelling, hemorrhage, and infarction.

The retinal vessels pass through the lamina cribrosa and optic disc when entering and leaving the globe. It is our hypothesis that smaller optic discs are associated with smaller retinal vessels by virtue of crowding as the nerve traverses the lamina. We sought to evaluate this possibility in data from the Beaver Dam Eye Study.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A private census of the population of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, was performed from September 15, 1987, to May 4, 1988, to identify all eligible residents in the city or township of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin.8 Of the 5924 eligible individuals, 4926 (83%) persons 43 to 86 years of age participated in the baseline examination between March 1, 1988, and September 14, 1990. Differences between participants and nonparticipants have been published.8 Ninety-nine percent of the population was white. All data were collected with Institutional Review Board approval in conformity with all federal and state laws, and the study was in compliance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 1983. A standardized examination including refraction, and medical history was obtained.8 Intraocular pressure was measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer according to a standard protocol.9 Blood pressures were measured with the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program protocol.10 Pupils were dilated pharmacologically. Stereoscopic 30° color fundus photographs centered on the disc (Diabetic Retinopathy Study [DRS] standard field 1),11 were taken.

Optic disc and cup measurements were taken from the stereoscopic pairs of photographs centered on the optic disc (DRS field 1) taken with a 30° fundus camera (FF2-4; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), after pupil dilation according to a detailed standardized protocol. In brief, the stereoscopic pairs were examined, and both vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameters were measured with a template of graded circles.12 13 The magnification of the images from the fundus camera was 2.5.

The procedure for measuring the retinal vessels has been described.14 Diameters of retinal vessels were measured after converting the field-1 photographs to digital images. All arterioles and venules were measured in the area between 0.5 and 1 disc diameter from the optic disc margin with a computer-assisted program. The measurements of individual arterioles and venules were combined according to the formulas developed by Parr et al.15 16 and Hubbard et al.17 and modified by Knudtson et al.,14 to provide central retinal artery (CRAE) and central retinal vein equivalents (CRVE). The measurements of the optic discs were performed at a different time than the measurements of the retinal vessels, and the graders were also different.

Refraction was measured with an automated refractor (Humphrey; Carl Zeiss Meditec) in 97% of study subjects; the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy protocol was used in the remaining 3%.18 Diabetes was defined as a history of diabetes or fasting blood sugar or glycated hemoglobin exceeding age-specific levels.19

Although measures were taken from photographs of both eyes, data presented are from the right eye. Optic disc, cup, and vessel measurements were available for 4039 right eyes. Optic discs and cups were not measured in eyes with drusen of the optic disc, proliferative retinopathy at the disc, vascular occlusions, or other disc abnormalities or irregularities. The measurements were not analyzed in eyes with probable or definite glaucoma at baseline. In addition, we excluded 152 right eyes of persons without data on age, refraction, or blood pressure. Relevant measures were available for 3887 right eyes.

Because our interest was in small optic discs and cups, we categorized the measures into three groups. The smallest possible optic cup measure was 0 and defined the first category. The next smallest measure was more than 0 but less than the smallest circle on the template (<0.031) and defined the second category. All remaining measures defined the third category. A similar approach was taken to define optic disc categories; however, due to such small numbers at the lowest values (0.109 and 0.117 in.) these were combined with 0.125 in. to create the smallest category. The next smallest measure was 0.133 in., and all other measures were combined for the third category.

Linear regression analysis was used to model retinal vessel size based on optic cup or disc size after adjustment for other factors such as age, gender, refraction, intraocular pressure, and blood pressure. Because the size of the cup relative to the disc (i.e., cup-to-disc ratio) may be important, we included both disc and cup measures in some models (SAS ver. 8; SAS, Cary, NC).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Persons whose right eyes were excluded from these analyses were more likely to be hypertensive, be diabetic, have cataract, be older, have higher intraocular pressures, have narrower CRVE and CRAE, and have larger vertical cup diameters than those whose data were included in the subsequent analyses (Table 1) . CRAE and CRVE increased for increasing category of optic disc diameters from ≤0.125 to 0.133 to ≥0.141 in. in vertical and horizontal axes (Table 2) . The retinal vessel diameters (CRAE and CRVE) increased with each increasing category of cup diameters from 0 to <0.031 to ≥0.031 in., in vertical and horizontal axes (Table 2) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Characteristics of Those Excluded and Included in Analyses

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Retinal Arteriole (CRAE) and Venule (CRVE) Diameters by Optic Disc and Cup Diameters, Right Eyes

 
The imaging and measurement of optic disc and cup diameters, as well as vessel diameters, were affected by refractive error and age. Vessel diameters were associated with systemic blood pressure and sex. Optic disc and cup diameters in the same axis correlated highly (0.56 for both horizontal and vertical measurements). Although highly correlated, small differences at the categories of interest may have important effects, and so we included all these characteristics in our multivariable analyses (Table 2) . After adjustment, the same associations of increasing retinal vessel diameter with increasing category for disc and cup diameter remained. The associations between both horizontal and vertical disc diameters and CRAE and CRVE were significant. The association for trend of horizontal optic cup diameter with CRAE was significant, whereas that between vertical cup diameter and CRAE and horizontal cup diameter and CRVE was of borderline significance. The relationship of vertical cup diameters to CRVE was not significant. Replacing blood pressure with intraocular pressure in models had no significant effect on the relationships. Further adjustment for body height and diabetes status had no significant effect on the relationships.

Most of the eyes in the study had optic disc and cup diameters that fell in the largest (highest) category. Within this group, there were no significant differences in retinal vessel diameters with each increasing size of optic disc diameter treated continuously (Table 3) . There was some increase for increasing vertical disc measure which was no longer significant after adjusting for other measures. The increase in retinal vessel diameters with increasing disc and cup diameters up to the third category and subsequent leveling off with further increases in vertical disc and cup diameters is shown in Figure 1 . Similar results were found for horizontal disc and cup diameters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Change in Retinal Vessel Measure for Every 0.08-in. Change in Optic Disc or Cup Measure* among Eyes Already in the Highest Category for Disc or Cup Measure

 

Figure 1
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1. Mean retinal vessel diameters (CRAE, A, C; CRVE, B, D) for optic disc (A, B) and cup (C, D) as a continuous measure. Vertical bars represent the 95% confidence interval around the mean.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Our population-based data indicate an association between small optic discs and cups and narrower retinal arterioles. Beyond the smallest categories of optic disc and cup diameter, there were no further relationships between retinal vessel size and optic disc and cup diameters. The finding is in keeping with the notion of an effect of crowding at the optic nerve head that would not occur when the disc is a threshold diameter.

An association between optic disc diameter and retinal vessels may be a reflection of disc and vessel diameters being proportionately related to each other and may not be a causal effect of crowding on vessel diameter. Such anatomic differences as well as magnification differences resulting from refraction would be expected to produce proportional changes. Although refraction was an important variable in our models, we found no proportional change in vessel diameter for disc diameters ≥0.141 in. To control for possible anatomic differences, we included body height in additional analyses. This adjustment had no effect on our finding. Therefore, the relationship we found is not explained by proportional changes.

Because diabetes has been shown to be associated with vessel size (although unrelated to magnification), we included this characteristic in the additional analyses. Diabetes status did not influence our results. Because diabetes and body height were not important, we presented the results of a more parsimonious model that does not include them.

The associations between vessel calibers and size of optic discs are more consistent than for optic cups. Whereas optic cup diameter may truly not be as strongly related to vessel diameters as disc diameter, it is also possible that the greater grader variability in measuring optic cup diameters12 influenced our estimate of the relationships. Also, variations in intraocular pressure may have added to the variability in optic cup size. In addition, associations between vessel calibers and horizontal disc diameters are less consistent than those with vertical disc diameters, perhaps because of the elliptical nature of the optic disc. Eyes with smaller vertical disc diameters will have smaller optic discs overall than those with small horizontal disc diameters. Analysis using similar categories for the average of the horizontal and vertical measures results in significantly smaller vessel calibers for the smallest categories (data not shown).

Our study was prompted by the clinical observation that eyes having an episode of nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) appear to have smaller optic discs and cups in the fellow eye than other eyes. We have observed, in other studies, relationships of systemic markers of inflammation,20 21 diabetes, and hypertension22 23 to narrower retinal vessels. Some of these risk factors have also been found to be associated with NAION.24 25 26 27 28 Although it is possible that narrower retinal vessels are a reflection of these other systemic conditions and markers, it is also possible that retinal vessel diameters are independently related to disc measurements and that these all may be related to the development of nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy. The possible clinical utility of our observation awaits further research in the context of studies aimed at defining the prevalence and risk factors for this disease.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Lisa Grady for technical support.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by National Eye Institute Grant EY06594 (RK, BEKK).

Submitted for publication September 9, 2005; revised February 24, June 19, and September 1, 2006; accepted November 21, 2006.

Disclosure: K.E. Lee, None; B.E.K. Klein, None; R. Klein, None; S.M. Meuer, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Kristine E. Lee, University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 610 N. Walnut Street, 4th Floor WARF, Madison, WI 53726; klee{at}epi.ophth.wisc.edu.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Burde RM. Optic disk risk factors for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:759–764.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Duke-Elder S, Cook C. Normal and abnormal development. Congenital deformities. Duke-Elder S eds. System of Ophthalmology. Vol. 3, Pt. 2. 1964;668–688. CV Mosby Co St. Louis.
  3. Beck RW, Servais GE, Hayreh SS. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. IX. Cup-to-disc ratio and its role in pathogenesis. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:1503–1508.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Balazsi AG, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Douglas GR. Neuroretinal rim area in suspected glaucoma and early chronic open-angle glaucoma: correlation with parameters of visual function. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:1011–1014.[Abstract]
  5. McLeod D, Marshall J, Kohner EM. Role of axoplasmic transport in the pathophysiology of ischaemic disc swelling. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64:247–261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hayreh SS. Optic disc edema in raised intracranial pressure. V. Pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:1553–1565.[Abstract]
  7. Hayreh SS. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. V. Optic disc edema an early sign. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:1030–1040.[Abstract]
  8. Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL, De Mets DL. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1310–1315.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2224–2228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. Prev Med. 1976;5:207–215.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:786–806.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Klein BE, Magli YL, Richie KA, et al. Quantitation of optic disc cupping. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:1654–1656.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Magli YL, Klein BE. Protocol for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Measurements. 1989; NTIS Accession No. PB89–178909/AS Springfield, VA.
  14. Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Hubbard LD, et al. Revised formulas for summarizing retinal vessel diameters. Curr Eye Res. 2003;27:143–149.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Parr JC, Spears GF. General caliber of the retinal arteries expressed as the equivalent width of the central retinal artery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77:472–477.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Parr JC, Spears GF. Mathematic relationships between the width of a retinal artery and the widths of its branches. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974;77:478–483.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, King WN, et al. Methods for evaluation of retinal microvascular abnormalities associated with hypertension/sclerosis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2269–2280.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wang Q, Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE. Refractive status in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:4344–4347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Linton KL. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: Retinopathy in adults with newly discovered and previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:58–62.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Klein R, Sharrett AR, Klein BE, et al. Are retinal arteriolar abnormalities related to atherosclerosis?—The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1644–1650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Klein R, Klein BE, Knudtson MD, et al. Markers of inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:116–122.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Wong TY, Shankar A, Klein R, et al. Prospective cohort study of retinal vessel diameters and risk of hypertension. BMJ. 2004;329:79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wong TY, Shankar A, Klein R, Klein BE. Retinal vessel diameters and the incidence of gross proteinuria and renal insufficiency in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53:179–184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Guyer DR, Miller NR, Auer CL, Fine SL. The risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease in patients with anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1136–1142.[Abstract]
  25. Newman NJ, Scherer R, Langenberg P, et al. The fellow eye in NAION: report from the ischemic optic neuropathy decompression trial follow-up study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:317–328.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Salomon O, Huna-Baron R, Kurtz S, et al. Analysis of prothrombotic and vascular risk factors in patients with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:739–742.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Repka MX, Savino PJ, Schatz NJ, Sergott RC. Clinical profile and long-term implications of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:478–483.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Jacobson DM, Vierkant RA, Belongia EA. Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a case-control study of potential risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1403–1407.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
N. Cheung, S. Huynh, J. J. Wang, B. Taylor, F. M. A. Islam, S. M. Saw, T. Y. Wong, and P. Mitchell
Relationships of Retinal Vessel Diameters with Optic Disc, Macular and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters in 6-Year-Old Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2403 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
N. Cheung, L. Tong, G. Tikellis, S. M. Saw, P. Mitchell, J. J. Wang, and T. Y. Wong
Relationship of Retinal Vascular Caliber with Optic Disc Diameter in Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 4945 - 4948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meuer, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Meuer, S. M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS