|
|
||||||||
1From the Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and the 2Departments of Ophthalmology and 3Pharmacological & Physiological Science, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Transgenic mouse lines carrying the R172W mutation were generated. The retinal phenotype associated with this mutation in a low-expresser line (L-R172W) was examined, both structurally (histology with correlative immunohistochemistry) and functionally (electroretinography). By examining animals over time and with various rds genetic backgrounds, the authors evaluated the dominance of the defect. To assess the efficacy of gene transfer therapy as a treatment for this defect, a previously characterized transgenic line expressing the normal mouse peripherin/Rds (NMP) was crossed with a higher-expresser Rds line harboring the R172W mutation (H-R172W). Functional, structural, and biochemical analyses were used to assess rescue of the retinal disease phenotype.
RESULTS. In the wild-type (WT) background, L-R172W mice exhibited late-onset (12-month) dominant cone degeneration without any apparent effect on rods. The degeneration was slightly accelerated (9 months) in the rds+/– background. L-R172W retinas did not form outer segments in the absence of endogenous Rds. With use of the H-R172W line on an rds+/– background for proof-of-principle genetic supplementation studies, the NMP transgene product rescued rod and cone functional defects and supported outer segment integrity up to 3 months of age, but the rescue effect did not persist in older (11-month) animals.
CONCLUSIONS. The R172W mutation leads to dominant cone degeneration in the mouse model, regardless of the expression level of the transgene. In contrast, effects of the mutation on rods are dose dependent, underscoring the usefulness of the L-R172W line as a faithful model of the human phenotype. This model may prove helpful in future studies on the mechanisms of cone degeneration and for elucidating the different roles of Rds in rods and cones. This study provides evidence that Rds genetic supplementation can be used to partially rescue visual function. Although this strategy is capable of rescuing haploinsufficiency, it does not rescue the long-term degeneration associated with a gain-of-function mutation.
Rds was first identified in association with a naturally occurring mouse model called retinal degeneration slow (rds–/–), which does not form outer segments and has no detectable rod or cone ERG response. The hemizygous (rds+/–) mouse exhibits a haploinsufficiency phenotype associated with decreased rod and cone ERG responses and whorl-like, malformed outer segments.6 Rds is a structural protein present as a homodimer or a heterodimer complex, or as both, with its homologue, Rom-1 (rod outer segment membrane protein-1).7 8 Results of in vitro studies indicate that the large extracellular D2 loop of Rds (containing more than 70% of disease-causing-mutations) is the site of interactions to form Rds/Rom-1 complexes,7 whereas the C terminus of Rds protein is responsible for outer segment targeting of the protein.9 Rds is thought to have several hypothesized roles in the outer segment: (1) Rds/Rom-1 complexes function to keep the "hairpin rim" region of the rod outer segment disks intact10 11 12 ; (2) Rds/Rom-1 complexes potentially keep the disks connected to the rod outer segment plasma membrane through interactions with GARP (glutamic acid-rich protein) and the cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels of the plasma membrane13 ; (3) the C terminus of Rds directs complex targeting to the outer segment and helps align outer segment disks9 ; and (4) the C terminus of Rds may mediate disc membrane fusion,14 15 16 17 possibly in direct cooperation with other binding partners.18
Recent evidence from our group has suggested that Rds does not function the same way in cone photoreceptors that it does in rod photoreceptors. This observation came from studies of the cone-dominant Nrl/rds double knockout mouse,19 whose phenotype is distinct from that of both the Nrl–/– (neural retina leucine zipper)20 and the rds–/– retina. In contrast to the rds–/– retina, the all-cone Nrl–/–/rds–/– retina contains cone outer segments that, despite grossly aberrant morphology, are capable of robust phototransduction. Structurally, these outer segments are tubular and do not form lamellae. The reasons for the difference in Rds function in cones and rods are not fully understood, but this observation is supported by the clinical findings that RDS mutations can cause either rod-dominant (retinitis pigmentosa) or cone-dominant (macular dystrophy) retinal degeneration.21
Although the R172W mutation occurs within the D2 loop region of Rds, it is not located in the area required for complex assembly.7 In fact, it is unclear why the R172W mutation causes this distinct cone-associated phenotype. What is clear is the importance of arginine at position 172 to cone structure. Specifically, each of the three known substitutions at position 172 (R172W, R172G, R172Q) causes a cone- or a fovea-dominant defect in patients.4 21 22 In contrast, the N244K Rds mutation causes retinitis pigmentosa, whereas the N244H mutation causes macular dystrophy.23 24 To study the mechanism underlying the pathogenesis associated with the R172W mutation, we have generated and characterized multiple transgenic mouse lines carrying this mutation on different rds genetic backgrounds. In our previous work,25 we reported the biochemical characterization of the R172W protein in a high-expressing transgenic line (H-R172W), with a level corresponding to approximately 75% of the endogenous Rds. We showed that R172W Rds associates with Rom-1 and exhibits no defects in complex formation.25 These data were supported by findings by Molday et al.8 indicating that recombinant R172W protein was glycosylated and could properly form complexes in vitro. However, our in vivo study25 with the higher expresser line demonstrated that the R172W protein was more susceptible to partial tryptic digestion than wild-type (WT) Rds, suggesting a slight conformational change in complexes containing R172W Rds.
In the present study, we characterized a new R172W model that closely mimics the human retinal phenotype and tested the efficacy of gene transfer therapy as a strategy to combat diseases associated with RDS mutations. As reported previously, the H-R172W line exhibits an early-onset dominant cone-rod dystrophy that is not characteristic of the retinal degeneration observed in human patients.25 Here we present additional data obtained with this model indicating that genetic supplementation with WT Rds provides partial, long-term rescue of rod function but no permanent rescue of cone function. Although functional dominance of the R172W allele is the most likely explanation for the lack of persistent cone rescue, conclusions regarding the potential usefulness of gene transfer as a treatment are limited by the severity of the H-R172W phenotype and its lack of correlation with the human disease phenotype. Therefore, we also have characterized an alternative R172W model (L-R172W), which expresses a lower amount of R172W protein. L-R172W mice exhibit late-onset cone degeneration without manifesting a dominant effect on rods, closely resembling the human clinical phenotype. Thus, the L-R172W line offers a useful model for future studies of the mechanism of late-onset macular dystrophy.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of the Transgene
Total RNA was extracted from retinas of transgenic mice using reagent (TRIzol; Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). Five micrograms retinal RNA was separated by electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel containing 18% formaldehyde. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide to check RNA integrity (judged by the integrity of the 28s and 18s rRNA). RNA was then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and was hybridized first with
-32P-labeled SV40 polyA fragment to detect the expression of the transgene. The blot was stripped and rehybridized to the second probe (
-32P-labeled exon 1 of RDS) to equally detect the endogenous transgene transcripts. Prehybridization and hybridization conditions were the same as described.27
Western Blot Analysis
Rabbit polyclonal antibody against residues 331 to 346 of murine Rds C terminus (1:1000 dilution) was used for the detection of Rds, as described.25 Anti-actin antibody (1:250 dilution; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used to control for sample loading. Retinal protein extraction and blot analysis were carried out as previously described.25
Immunohistochemistry
Mice were humanely killed, and whole eyes from transgenic and nontransgenic mice were enucleated and fixed for 2 hours in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 4% formaldehyde, after which the lens was removed and the remaining tissue was placed in phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde for an additional 12 hours of fixation at 4°C. Eyes were embedded, sectioned, and stained with appropriate primary and commercially available, fluorescence-conjugated (FITC and Cy3) secondary antibodies (see figure legends), as described.25 The 3B6 anti-Rds antibody (kindly provided by Robert Molday) was used at a 1:5 dilution with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.2% Triton X-100. Anti-human blue opsin antibody (a generous gift from Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) was used at a 1:3000 dilution. The density of the blue cones was assessed across a retinal expanse 100-µm in length at a distance 300 µm from the edge of the optic nerve head in the inferior hemisphere, corresponding to the retinal region of highest blue cone content.
Light and Electron Microscopy and Quantitative Morphometry
Enucleated eyes were fixed in buffered mixed aldehydes, processed, embedded in plastic resin, and sectioned, as described in detail previously.25 28 For light microscopy, sections (0.75-µm thickness, stained with 1% toluidine blue) were photographed with a photomicroscope (BH-2; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) in auto-expose mode using 20x (air) or 60x (oil immersion) DPlanApo objectives. For electron microscopy, ultrathin (silver-gold) sections were poststained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate on-grid and were viewed with an electron microscope (JEM-1200EX; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 80 KeV. Photoreceptor nuclei were counted in a microscopic field that spanned 100 µm within the central superior and central inferior portions of the retina, approximately 300 µm away from the edge of the optic nerve head. At least three individual eyes taken from separate litters were used for examination at each time point.
Electron Microscopic Immunogold Cytochemistry
The procedures used were as described in detail.25 28 In brief, ultrathin tissue sections (in LR White plastic, on nickel grids) were briefly rinsed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05 M Tris) and then were "blocked" for 1 hour at room temperature in blocking buffer (TBS containing 1% [wt/vol] RIA-grade BSA and 5% [vol/vol] normal goat serum [NGS]). The sections were exposed overnight at 4°C to anti-cone opsin mixture antibody (1:2500 in blocking buffer). After brief rinses with TBS, sections were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to 15-nm diameter colloidal gold (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL), diluted 1:50 in blocking buffer. After brief rinses in TBS and distilled water, sections were treated with 1% aqueous glutaraldehyde (5 minutes) and rinsed with TBS. Sections were then stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate (15 minutes) and lead citrate (6 minutes), rinsed again with distilled water, air dried, and exposed to OsO4 vapors for 30 minutes before viewing with an electron microscope.
Electroretinography
Electroretinograms were recorded from nontransgenic and transgenic mice (n = 6–10 each) at different developmental stages to obtain dark-adapted, light-adapted, and specific cone responses, as described.19 29 For spectral electroretinography, a two-flash technique was used to record the responses of blue and red/green cones. The first flash was used to desensitize the rod response; after a 2-second interval, the second flash was presented through a specific filter (400 nm for blue cone and 500 nm for red/green cone) to the retina. In this study, the flash intensity was held constant at 3.1 log cd · s/m2, and the interflash interval was kept at 2 seconds Mice were not dark adapted before recording. Each response represented the average of 10 stimulating flashes at the same intensity and filter setting. At least two responses were recorded for each filter to make sure the ERG system was stable. Statistical significance was determined by Students t-test (two samples) or ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test (more than two samples). ERG amplitudes are presented as averages ± SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The first step in characterizing the L-R172W line was to confirm the expression of the transgenic protein. Retinas from L-R172W mice were taken at postnatal day (P) 30 and used for Northern and Western blot analyses to document the presence of the R172W transcript and protein, respectively. As shown in Figure 1 , the R172W transcript (Fig. 1A) and protein (Fig. 1B) were present in retinas from transgenic mice of multiple genetic backgrounds. Based on Western blot analysis of nonreducing gels, R172W protein in L-R172W animals was capable of forming dimers and higher-order complexes, even in the absence of native Rds. Although Rom-1 was nearly undetectable in the rds–/– retina, the presence of R172W protein led to a significant increase in the level of Rom-1 (Fig. 1B , right). Based on previously published quantitative analysis,25 animals homozygous for the L-R172W transgene on the rds null background expressed the R172W Rds protein at approximately 40% of the endogenous Rds protein level. To confirm that the IRBP promoter was capable of driving transgene expression in rods and cones, immunohistochemical labeling of R172W protein from L-R172W mice was undertaken. As shown in Figure 1C , R172W protein was found in rods and cones (labeled for S-opsin).
|
|
Cone Degeneration in L-R172W Is Accelerated in the rds+/– Background
Because humans affected by the R172W mutation have one WT and one mutant allele, we studied retinal structure and function of L-R172W animals in the rds hemizygous background. As shown in Figure 3A , in some L-R172W/rds+/– mice, retinal structure at 12 months of age was slightly improved when compared with rds+/– (6–7 vs. 3–4 rows of outer nuclear layer [ONL] nuclei, respectively, in the example shown). However, detailed morphometric analysis indicated no generalized improvement—that is, L-R172W/rds+/– mice, as a group, did not have more photoreceptor nuclei (per 100-µm area) than nontransgenic littermates at 12 months of age (L-R172W/rds+/– 124 ± 12 nuclei/100 µm vs. rds+/– 129 ± 13 nuclei/100 µm; n = 6). To test the effect of the R172W protein on rod function in the rds+/– mice, we examined scotopic ERG amplitudes. At early time points (2 months), the presence of the L-R172W protein seemed beneficial to rod function: L-R127W/rds+/– mice had significantly larger scotopic a-wave amplitudes than age-matched rds+/– controls (221.4 ± 47.4 µV vs. 149.0 ± 17.0 µV, respectively; P < 0.05). Consistent with observations of human populations, L-R172W mice in the hemizygous background did not exhibit rod-dominant degeneration. Long-term rod degeneration in L-R172W/rds+/– mice was consistent with the standard haploinsufficiency phenotype seen in rds+/– mouse retinas.
|
R172W Rds Does Not Promote Outer Segment Formation
Given our observations that L-R172W can improve rod structure in the hemizygous background (albeit without permanent functional rescue) and that L-R172W stabilizes Rom-1 expression in the absence of native Rds, we proceeded to test the hypothesis that the L-R172W protein could support the formation of photoreceptor outer segments in the rds–/– (null) background. A structural and functional developmental study was undertaken; eyes were collected from L-R172W/rds–/– and rds–/– mice at P10, P20, and P30. The eyes were examined histologically (Fig. 4) , but, in spite of its biochemical similarity to native Rds in terms of complex formation with itself and Rom-1 (as shown in Fig. 1 and Ding et al.25 ), the amount of R172W protein expressed in L-R172W animals, even dysmorphic ones, was not capable of supporting the formation of outer segments during ocular development. Even though they have similar quantities of Rds protein, the phenotype in L-R172W/rds–/– mice (no outer segments) was significantly worse than in rds+/– mice (retention of dysmorphic outer segments even at 1 year of age; see Fig. 3A ). Finally, ERG analysis indicated that L-R172W/rds–/– animals did not have more function than rds–/– mice (not shown).
|
Light microscopy (Fig. 5A) indicated that, when the animals were 3 months of age, supplementation with NMP led to grossly normal retinal morphology and rescue of ONL thickness (in the H-R172W/rds+/– background). Correlative electron microscopy indicated that supplementation with NMP could restore normal rod outer segment (ROS) structures. However, this structural rescue was not sustained when the animals were 11 months of age (data not shown). As previously reported, the NMP+/–/rds+/– retinas (shown with WT as controls in Fig. 5B ) exhibited infrequent abnormalities in ROS ultrastructure as a result of relative Rds underexpression (approximately 80% of WT) but showed normal ONL thickness.26
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our early observation of the R172W protein as incapable of providing significant structural rescue to the rds–/– retina merits further discussion. In our previous work,25 we reported that at early time points, the R172W protein from the H-R172W model was capable of mediating significant structural rescue of ROS in the rds–/– background. H-R172W+/+/rds–/– retinas have outer segments that look similar to those in the rds+/– mice. This partial rescue could be interpreted as a positive function of the R172W allele in rods; however, because so much R172W protein is present in that mouse line, the adverse effects of the R172W mutation were seen much earlier, and the cone degeneration was correspondingly more severe. Thus, we may say that the effects of R172W are clearly dose dependent: at low doses (L-R172W), the dominant cone defect appears later in life (9–12 months) and is moderate (approximately 20% reduction in cone function); however, at high doses (H-R172W), the dominant defect appears very early (1 month) and is devastating (approximately 75% reduction in cone function25 ). These trends persist regardless of the rds background and clearly highlight the importance of a physiologically relevant model for studying disease pathogenesis. The H-R172W line was able to provide us with invaluable biochemical information, but the clinically more relevant phenotype of the lower-expresser line (L-R172W) leads to more accurate interpretations of disease progression and mechanism.
In this study, the functional phenotype of the L-R172W mouse model closely resembles that seen in human patients harboring this same RDS mutation. The R172W mutation in humans causes a late-onset disease characterized by visual deficits and a decrease in cone function. Although humans affected by this mutation typically do not exhibit any statistically significant decrease in rod function, there is evidence that their rod function tends to be toward the lower limits of the normal range (Fishman G, personal communication, 1999), similar to that observed in our mouse model. Our morphometric observations indicating a decrease in the number of cone nuclei is a first step toward understanding the mechanism of disease progression in patients with the R172W mutation. The fact that the observation is limited to cones further supports the hypothesis that Rds functions differently in rods versus cones.
Here we observed that cone degeneration occurred in older animals in the WT background but was accelerated in the rds hemizygous background. This is probably a result of the dominant effect of the R172W protein combined with the moderate effect of the Rds haploinsufficiency phenotype. Although we observed no dominant effect of the L-R172W on rod function, L-R172W/rds+/– animals did exhibit the standard rds+/– haploinsufficiency phenotype. In this one aspect, the L-R172W/rds+/– diverged from the human phenotype. R172W patients did not exhibit clinical signs of Rds haploinsufficiency; rather, they had pure cone degeneration. This disparity might have occurred because our L-R172W mouse model had slightly less R172W protein than what would be afforded by one WT allele (approximately 40% of total Rds in the mouse vs. 50% in the human). However, this disparity likely resulted from species-specific differences between mice and humans; mice exhibit a decidedly lower tolerance for Rds deficiency than do humans. For example, when examined on an rds+/– background, a typical Rds loss-of-function mutation, such as C214S, leads to an early-onset haploinsufficiency phenotype indistinguishable from that seen in rds+/– mice.30 Conversely, patients with the C214S mutation exhibit rod defects (e.g., night blindness), but not until later in life (fourth to fifth decade).31 Far from being a detriment to our models, the differential requirements of human rods versus mouse rods for Rds is further proof of the underlying differences in the role of Rds in rods and cones. In other words, human rods need less Rds than do mouse rods, whereas human cones and mouse cones need similar quantities of Rds (as evidenced by the similarity in cone-dominant disease patterns in humans and mouse models).
The second portion of our study dealt with characterizing the ability of wild-type Rds (NMP) to rescue the severe cone-rod degeneration seen in the H-R172W model and provided us with valuable information regarding the usefulness of gene transfer therapy to rescue dominant disease phenotypes. In the simplest case, one might hypothesize that genetic supplementation would have no effect on a dominant mutation. However, our data do not support this theory. At early time points with H-R172W, rod degeneration is not dominant. In other words, in terms of rod function, having one allele of H-R172W is better than not having it at all. This phenotype is best explained by hypothesizing that at early time points, R172W, if enough is present, it can support rod function, though not as well as native Rds. Thus, the observation that NMP can rescue rod function at early time points is not unexpected. In fact, the H-R172W+/–/NMP+/–/rds+/– rod function looks strikingly similar to the homozygous L-R172W/+/+ phenotype: rod function at the lower end of the normal WT range. What is surprising is that the severe, early-onset, dominant-cone degeneration observed in the H-R172W+/–/rds+/– can be rescued almost completely. For example, at 1 month of age, the H-R172W cone degeneration is a completely dominant effect (not associated with haploinsufficiency), yet the presence of one allele of NMP provides considerable rescue of cone function (approximately 90% of WT). This observation is exciting from a mechanistic point of view and begs the question; how does NMP overcome the dominant structural and functional effect of H-R172W in cones?
From a gene therapy perspective, however, our gene transfer strategy is less promising. For a gene therapy to be clinically viable, rescue must be long term. Our data clearly show that over the long term, the presence of WT Rds does not provide rescue to cone function. That rescue persists to a certain level in rods is of little clinical usefulness because rod degeneration is not associated with the R172W phenotype in humans. Even with the persistent partial rescue in rods combined with observations at later time points, H-R172W/rds+/– has equal or better rod function than rds+/– (see Fig. 7 and our previous work25 ), which supports our contention that the R172W mutation does not have a dominant effect on rods in the traditional sense.
Interestingly, however, evidence suggests that the R172W allele may have a small, virtually undetectable dominant effect on the rod. First, the long-term rod ERG in L-R172W animals and R172W patients is at the far lower end of the normal range, though the divergence from normal is not statistically significant. Second, though NMP-mediated rescue of rods in the H-R172W line is certainly a more efficient rescue than of cones over time, this rescue also declines (Figs. 7C -D), in marked contrast to the rescuing ability of NMP in both the rds+/– and in the C214S/rds+/– loss-of-function mutation in which rescue persists at similar levels throughout the life of the animal.32 All these observations suggest that, though gene transfer therapy of the WT Rds may not be a suitable strategy for R172W patients, understanding the reasons for the differential requirement of rods and cones for Rds and the subtle differences in the effect of the R172W mutation in rods and cones is critical for the design of any form of effective treatment. Future rescue studies of the R172W model will likely make use of gene replacement with concurrent gene knockdown approaches. Studies on other dominant retinal degenerations (e.g., the P23H rhodopsin mutation) have used ribozyme33 34 or small interfering or small hairpin RNA (siRNA/shRNA) approaches as a way to decrease expression of a dominant mutant protein.35 36 37 Similar approaches could be used to overcome gain-of-function mutations in Rds. Because the dose of normal and mutant Rds is critical to disease phenotype and rescue, treatments will have to be fine-tuned to deliver the appropriate amount of therapeutic vector.
Here we have characterized a mouse model of cone dystrophy associated with the R172W mutation (L-R172W), which closely mimics the late-onset cone dystrophy seen in human patients harboring this mutation. Although gene replacement therapy alone is not likely to be an effective treatment strategy for R172W-asscociated macular degeneration, the temporary cone rescue we observed after supplementation with NMP raises exciting questions about the mechanism of the R172W-mediated degeneration. Future studies with this model in native and cone-dominant (Nrl–/–) retinas may enable us to gain greater understanding of the pathogenesis and intricacies of dominant cone dystrophies and may help us to elucidate some of the underlying reasons for differences in rod/cone biogenesis and degeneration.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication June 4, 2007; revised August 10, 2007; accepted October 15, 2007.
Disclosure: S. Conley, None; M. Nour, None; S.J. Fliesler, None; M.I. Naash, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Muna I. Naash, Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 940 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, BMSB 781, Oklahoma City, OK 73104; muna-naash{at}ouhsc.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ser mutation in peripherin/rds causes a loss-of-function phenotype in transgenic mice. Biochem J. 2005;388:605–613.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |