IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1257 on March 3, 2008
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2008;49:1745-1752.)
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.07-1257

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.07-1257v1
49/5/1745    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. D.

Comparison of Time-Domain OCT and Fundus Photographic Assessments of Retinal Thickening in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

Matthew D. Davis,1 Susan B. Bressler,2 Lloyd Paul Aiello,3 Neil M. Bressler,2 David J. Browning,4 Christina J. Flaxel,5 Donald S. Fong,6,7 William J. Foster,8,9 Adam R. Glassman,10 Mary Elizabeth R. Hartnett,11 Craig Kollman,10 Helen K. Li,12 Haijing Qin,10 Ingrid U. Scott,13 and the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Study Group14

1From the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; the 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; the 3Beetham Eye Institute, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; 4Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina; 5Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; the 6Department of Ophthalmology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Baldwin Park, California; the 7Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; the 8Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College at The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; the 9Department of Physics, The University of Houston, Houston, Texas; the 10Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida; the 11Department of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; the 12Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas; and the 13Department of Ophthalmology and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

PURPOSE. To explore the correlation between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and stereoscopic fundus photographs (FP) for the assessment of retinal thickening (RT) in diabetic macular edema (DME) within a clinical trial.

METHODS. OCT, FP, and best corrected visual acuity (VA) measurements were obtained in both eyes of 263 participants in a trial comparing two photocoagulation techniques for DME. Correlation coefficients (r) were calculated comparing RT measured by OCT, RT estimated from FP, and VA. Principal variables were central subfield retinal thickness (CSRT) obtained from the OCT fast macular map and DME severity assessed by a reading center using a seven-step photographic scale combining the area of thickened retina within 1 disc diameter of the foveal center and thickening at the center.

RESULTS. Medians (quartiles) for retinal thickness within the center subfield by OCT at baseline increased from 236 (214, 264) µm in the lowest level of the photographic scale to 517 (455, 598) µm in the highest level (r = 0.67). However, CSRT interquartile ranges were broad and overlapping between FP scale levels, and there were many outliers. Correlations between either modality and VA were weaker (r = 0.57 for CSRT, and r = 0.47 for the FP scale). OCT appeared to be more reproducible and more sensitive to change in RT between baseline and 1 year than was FP.

CONCLUSIONS. There was a moderate correlation between OCT and FP assessments of RT in patients with DME and slightly less correlation of either measure with VA. OCT and FP provide complementary information but neither is a reliable surrogate for VA. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00071773.)





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. E. Gangnon, M. D. Davis, L. D. Hubbard, L. M. Aiello, E. Y. Chew, F. L. Ferris III, M. R. Fisher, and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Res
A Severity Scale for Diabetic Macular Edema Developed from ETDRS Data
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 5041 - 5047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology