IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.07-1181

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.07-1181v1
49/5/2077    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kanis, M. J
Right arrow Articles by van Norren, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kanis, M. J
Right arrow Articles by van Norren, D.

Article

Foveal cone-photoreceptor integrity in aging macula disorder

Martijn J Kanis 1*, Robert P.L. Wisse 1, Tos T. J. M. Berendschot 2, Jan van de Kraats 3, and Dirk van Norren 3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, UMC Utrecht, AZU E03.136, Utrecht, Netherlands
2 Department of Ophthalmology, University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
3 Department of Ophthalmology, UMC Utrecht, AZU E03.136, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, NL-3508 GA, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: M.J.Kanis{at}umcutrecht.nl.


   Abstract

Purpose: To establish the relation between AMD stage and a quantitative measure for the integrity of foveal cone photoreceptors related to the optical Stiles-Crawford effect. Methods: Fifty-six AMD eyes and 57 control eyes were included in the final analysis. AMD was graded conform the International Classification System into 5 mutually exclusive stages. Stages 0-1 were labeled no AMD, stages 2-3 were called early AMD, and stage 4 was called late AMD. Fundus reflectometry, together with a model fit procedure, provided information on directional cone reflectance (Rd), a quantitative measure for the integrity of foveal cone photoreceptors. Optical densities of macular pigment (MPOD) and melanin (MOD) were also obtained. A general linear model analysis was used to compare Rd, MPOD and MOD between AMD stages. Results: Mean Rd was lower in early AMD (0.92%, P < 0.001) and late AMD (0.86%, P < 0.001) compared to mean Rd in the no AMD stage (1.76%). Mean MPOD was not different in early AMD (0.53, P = 0.05), but it was lower in late AMD (0.19, P < 0.001) compared to mean MPOD in the no AMD stage (0.42). Mean MOD was lower in early AMD (1.09, P = 0.001) and late AMD (1.01, P = 0.004) compared to mean MOD in the no AMD stage (1.23). Conclusions: Foveal cones show signs of misalignment and/or outer segment deterioration in early AMD. Melanin rather than macular pigment might play a protective role against AMD, although loss of these ocular pigments can also be caused by AMD.

Key Words: AMD, cones, antioxidants, melanin, reflectometry, macular pigment







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology